Jump to content

Numark3

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Numark3

  1. id love for you to quote me on any of that lol. I never said any of that. Just pointing out your comment on hearsay was objectively dumb, false, and misinformation.
  2. just gonna ignore the lies you posted on this same page? Nice job spreading misinformation lol
  3. I love you two chiming in to share something objectively wrong! But I don’t expect anything less. It’s why juries have to be treated like babies, there is no expectation that the common American has any accurate knowledge of the legal system (we actually presume the opposite: that they hold inaccurate information. Example would be you two) hearsay can be credible, direct evidence can be not credible. Wild wild stuff to understand, I know
  4. lol it can be. and circumstantial evidence can be better than forensics or direct evidence. WILD I KNOW!?!?!? They all describes types of evidence, not their credibility or weight. Smarty pants
  5. that explains a lot lol Continue getting distressed because professionals who have the whole picture disagree with your interpretation of some texts and reports. you might want to get a different hobby, make-pretend cop is stressing you out.
  6. it’s because you do not have the whole picture, you are looking at only a portion of it. And you are not qualified to analyze any of it legally. it is distressing? Grow up. It is absolutely crazy that someone can form a conclusion over pieces of evidence, and then get distressed when actual professionals with the whole picture disagree. Stop pretending to be a prosecutor based on what pieces of information Twitter feeds you. Get a job or life or something
  7. ? yea, but those are dead babies. So deal with it
  8. correcting someone doesn’t mean it bothered me, but you can think it bothered me if it makes you feel better! You can totally have that. great job that pays way too much (lawyers seriously get paid too much imo), teaches writing at a great school for fun, works on big cases you have alllllll heard of.
  9. I don’t teach at a community college but I would love to! What do you have against community colleges? what do you do that lets you be able to put people down who study or work at a community college? My legal career is accomplished, not sure why you think making up stuff about me on a forum would bother me. thank you! It was pretty witty. It being true makes it easier to come up with, but whatever
  10. it’s one of the biggest in the country, but don’t worry, we only represent sophisticated clients. So I won’t be seeing you.
  11. im doing quite well, thank you. To actually be able to be qualified to form legal opinions, which all of you like to pretend to do, I suspect you could benefit from a legal education. you may not know this, but you are playing make-pretend at something that takes years of education, training, and practice to do. It’s why we ask juries to find facts. It’s why we forbid juries from making legal conclusions. You are unqualified. Lol
  12. lol. I just hope all of you only talk about the coup online. Someone talking about this in real life would be too cringey too deal with haha
  13. none of what you say is true lol. But thanks for reminding me of my successful career? hate on the people all you want. But you have to get of the weeds of nonsense.
  14. outsiders following investigations Or litigation is always, no offense, child’s play. You can find anything you want if you look for it. So in the age of reddit and forums and Twitter, you may see all the compelling evidence and dots being connected. But you have to understand that it’s people with a goal playing with a fraction of the available evidence. Here is the truth I have said since day one. There was no Russian collusion. That was laughable. There was no planned coup, that is laughable. People wanted to throw any ***** against the wall because they don’t like trump. That’s that. and.....?
  15. I can give you the answer right now if you want: Nothing will happen for anyone responsible for the "soft coup," and in fact, you have to believe in Reddit conspiracy theories to think otherwise. Edit: Sorry if you did not want spoilers, that was very jerk-like of me to not post a spoiler warning
  16. At the beginning of last year DR said that indictments were going to start by the summer or fall of 2019... but wait and see, by 2040 it'll happen
  17. Someone who spends a substantial amount of their time on the internet (either reddit or forums) discussing deep state politics. Serious question DR, since you are a serious person: At what date in time, if nothing has happened, can we all tell you that you are wrong? 2021, 2023, 2025?
  18. Spoiler warning you clown: he is going to walk free from all of this. I don't know what is more sad, that you spend all this time on this stupid topic....or someone who spends 5 minutes on this could have told you the end result you failed to predict. DR in 2037: "People are watching, just you wait. My inner circle says this is going to move faster than you think"
  19. Wrong Wrong (better check your inner circle of um....contacts?) Waiting for the perp walks. Like I told you, you will be wrong on this.
  20. A significant amount of rookies contributing to a playoff team? Yes. what else can a playoff team ask for?
  21. you guessed it. frank Stallone
×
×
  • Create New...