Numark3

Ohhhhhh, you are a nutjob. lol making up stuff again

why do you refuse to share your line of work, while ridiculing other’s? and take a poll, plenty of people would take a paycheck for things they don’t morally agree with. Great great discovery (that i freely admit lol)

Whats NSFL?

asking if I would murder a child after it was born? No, and that is irrelevant to the topic of abortion. no bill or law has ever permitted that, that is an extremely misleading right-wing scare tactic.

I like you pretending to be a lawyer. It’s adorable. what’s your job anyways, let’s discuss how it perfectly align with you morals. No? Didn’t think so

the truth of that tweet wasn’t relevant to the point. DR, for whatever reason, wants to argue that China invented the narrative that calling a virus by it country of origin is wrong. This is objectively not true, as it started elsewhere, and DR just can’t admit he was wrong with that point. I have constantly said China engages in propaganda. That does not mean everything derives from Chinese propaganda lol

what is your point? I have repeatedly said I would do it for money. Nothing slipped lol. also, while I haven’t said it, I would also do stuff for money I didn’t agree with. Big deal, I just so happen to agree with abortions. If a woman wants one, then it would be morally wrong to say no. if you have a job, a big if, then I doubt you agree with everything about it.

I liked your previous strategy of not posting evidence. While it made you look stupid, at least you didn't post this (which went against your point). Getting you into a corner and making you post something as evidence (even though we both knew it would be objectively against your point) was very easy. like dinner?

Nice that you know how to replace a syllable with a different one (while making no sense to the rest of the word).

What you can't grasp is I don't think abortions are immoral. I know very confusing for little brain!!! Me: I would do something I don't find immoral for money. You: YOU SELL MORALS FOR MONEY Me: Nope, i said the opposite You: YOU A BABY KILLA ME: Sure, killing fetuses is fine so woooooo me! I would gladly perform my civic duty and kill fetuses the day before the due date. And you want to pay me, sign me up.

Oh you are going to need a much earlier date than that lol. Even the WHO stated in early February that they were declining to call it the chinese virus because that would be stigmatizing and offensive. Everyone please note that DR thought this narrative started in March. He is objectively wrong, shocker.

that was the question....? I ignored it because it was boring. While DR is an idiotic clown, he can at least be entertaining. You are a boring dumb person. We both know it (and if you are in denial, look at your job and achievements in life) And your question didnt make sense. I said I am not morally opposed to abrotions, so why would I have an issue performing one? That doesn't mean my morals are for sale, it is the opposite.

DR: China started the racist narrative. objectivity: No it didn't, show evidence DR: I don't have evidence, and if evidence shows otherwise, it was ACTUALLY CHINA objectivity: show your facts DR: YOU ARE CHANGING GOALPOSTS objectivity: the goalposts have not changed, and it has been clear for pages DR: I AM DONE WITH YOU

In his defense, since he posts 100 nonsensical links/tweets a day, the fact many are BS is hardly surprising haha. But we have to forgive him, he is gullible and susceptible to following internet disinformation

Quick, go post 50 more links today that no one will read!!!!

Lol, no the point of that post was calling you an idiot. Because you are an idiot. And i followed it up by saying you are an idiot because China did not start the narrative in those tweets. I know you have difficulty following logic when it contains multiple steps, it is okay.

Where are your questions you desperately want me to answer...?

lol, let me go see what your hard-hitting questions are No no, the vast amount of wasted life and time (with no productivity or achievements) you spend here copying and pasting tweets is an actual fact. It is wonderful you have about 6 people that like to see it. I mean, you could start a blog and probably get like, 20 followers.

Nope, see above. I am right. Anyways, you are wrong, it is very clear (with evidence of people calling it racist before china did or any of the media examples) that is wasn't china. You won't post the earliest example, because I will show you something objectively beforehand. We both know it. Clowwwwwwwwn

My first post on the topic, of course I am right in that I had a very specific point.

While you may be the only person to equal DR's great use of life and time expended on posting nonsense to a subforum with 20 active users (seriously, get a life....you don't even spend 5+ hours a day on a forum for discussions, that is fine. You spend it just copying and pasting tweets and propaganda for literally no audience), I appreciate a MP image.

Lol no it wasn't. My first (and only) position was that the media was not parroting the CCP's position that "Chinese Virus" is racist. And the reason is, because it wasn't china who started it (they released propaganda subsequently). Everyone knows the CCP releases disinformation. Lol what questions. No one is dodging your 3rd grade level questions. And thank you for complimenting my job, that never gets old!

Show us the earliest example of that narrative starting then. If it is one of these outlets, then maybe you have proof. But we both know why you can't actually do that.

The whole "chinese virus is racist" narrative is classic woke liberalism. I don't agree with it, and I don't care. But saying China started it, and not liberals, needs proof.

Ahhh, so you have no evidence. The old "I have no evidence, but whoever started it, WAS ACTUALLY CHINA" trick! I like your strategy of posting so much nonsense that getting called out on lies is not a big deal. Move on liar. Fetuses aren't children, but keep your weird abortion thoughts to the abortion thread.