Numark3

yup. Spammers from either side are best left ignored

very real!

She should be held accountable. What a hypocrite

Very good thread. Can’t deny that

too many of these cases to keep up lol

yea. I don’t know anything about the facts of this case. Sounds like 100% chance it’s going away though....at some point

DR has a great understanding of the substance of the case. Way better than me. But the decision today didn’t address the substance at all. All I was saying is that the court’s decision wasn’t political, and there is no indication they applied the wrong law. It looks like a good decision. it likely will nonetheless lead to Flynn being free soon. That’s not my point it’s just a pet peeve of mine for people to complain about a decision based on reasons not even before the court.

You are making no effort to understand the decision today. the appellate court doesn’t have the authority to get to your point about what the resolution should be based on the evidence. Asking it to is goofy, hence the decision today.

you aren’t listening or willing to have a real conversation. None of that was before the court today. Literally, none of that. What was before the court was a procedural legal issue. Not the substance of the case. therefore, what I am telling you, and what you don’t seem to understand, is that saying any of that to argue it was a political decision is bizarre. I agree he will be free soon, I didn’t say anything about the case against Flynn. I only said what I said. Which was that a lot of people clearly have a misunderstanding of the decision today because they are missing that the issue before the court was a pure legal question of procedure, not the facts/evidence in this case. thats not a poor look for me as a lawyer. But Um, okay. not seeing the forest through the trees? No. I am talking about the decision TODAY. You are unable to do that

but that was not the issue before the appellate court or relevant to its decision....

I don’t think it’ll be landslide either way. I’d be very surprised if trump won in a landslide

I think these protests could save trump tbh. It’s going to be an interesting election

yup, if you lose it must be a political hit job. Can’t actually say why the decision was contrary to law.

how does this even make sense? The issue before the court appears to be 100 percent procedural, and substantive evidence was not before it and was irrelevant.

what law do you think the court misapplied and why do you think they are wrong? here is why they distinguished it from Clinton, what do you think is wrong in this reasoning? “The dissent suggests that our approach here is inconsistent with In re Hillary Rodham Clinton & Cheryl Mills, No. 20- 5056 (D.C. Cir. Aug 14, 2020), ignoring the fact that we denied the writ as to petitioner Mills because she had an adequate alternative means to seek relief, id. at 8–10, the same reason we deny it here. We granted the writ as to Clinton, the other petitioner, because, unlike here, she did not have an adequate alternative remedy under our precedent, id. at 7–8 (citing In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 761 (D.C. Cir. 2014)), and because, unlike here, the district court had actually ruled on the motion at issue. (And, of course, we found that the ruling was a clear abuse of discretion under our precedent, id. at 10–18.)“

lol what! That’s a biased take haha

I think you are completely wrong over who constitutes the majority of the left.

I wonder what year the big finale will be? 2067?

that’s almost as funny as saying bill gates went to Epstein’s island multiple times, and as proof, posted a flight log of bill gates going to Florida once....all while bragging how they know the evidence the most....amazing lol

Oh good lord, some people are crazy with these defenses. not a mountain to die on thank you for posting Hillaryisgoingdown’s thoughts from thedonald.win. I’m sure these federal prosecutors are getting two gofundme’s confuses and it’s a big misunderstanding

Amazing

Ha, I like this idea. Though anyone who posts a lot of tweets, articles, and memes is going to be skewered towards positive results. And unsurprisingly, the results are going to favor towards the people with the majority political opinion. I still like this though

I hate stuff like this. I saw it all over the news when it happened. Where is it on fox news, or Breitbart, etc? Buried as well. Our news cycle is fast right now

there are plenty of examples of dems being sexist. Fat shaming is the strongest examples. she is fat, so is trump. Who cares.

How is fat shaming sexist? Don’t MSM and Dems also fat shame fat male republicans?