The Frankish Reich

Right. Trump said as much when asked about Comey. Something like "if he's guilty, he's guilty, if not, then he's not." Which is of course not the standard the Department of Justice uses. Under DOJ guidelines, you don't bring a prosecution on a coin flip chance of winning. You bring it only if you are confident that a jury will find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

/ / / / / / / / / https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna239549

I like how your trademark Citizenship Detector works.

Despite being a lawyer who went to a top law school, Hunter Biden went about this whole thing in a clumsy way. Here's my unsolicited legal advice, from an ordinary country lawyer: 1. Set up the Biden Company, LLC, with Joseph R. Biden getting 10% of all revenues. 2. Publicly state that although Joseph R. Biden, 46th President of the United States, will play no role in the affairs of the Biden Company, LLC. 3. Have Hunter Biden, on behalf of Biden Company, LLC, enter into various contracts with foreign companies, foreign nationals, and other companies that have official business with the Government of the United States. Set aside 10% of the contract revenues for the Big Guy. Legal! Ethical!!

Telling that I can't determine whether this is real or a joke.

You sound like a fun guy.

Maybe we should ask that Calvinist Minister who isn't ruling out stoning of adulterers. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/09/opinion/doug-wilson-america-religion-theocracy.html Would Trump be subject to stoning, or just his various mistresses? I'll need to ask him.

Profiles in Cowardice. When she's sworn in, and when Mike Johnson sees fit to bring the House back to Washington, there will be a vote. A simple one: a nonbinding resolution calling on the President to release the Epstein files. She will be the vote that causes the resolution to pass. Thomas Massie's (R-KY) resolution. That's all. A largely symbolic move. But an important one: get your Republican House Rep go on the record. Release the Epstein files, Yes or No. And Mike Johnson is terrified. Yes means crossing Trump. No means you've got a lot of explaining to do to your district. Yes or No. Are you pro-Trump and pro-pedophile? Or are you pro-transparency and anti-pedophile. What a horrific choice you have to make to serve under Trump's rule.

You are doing better!

I will point out that the Indian-Ugandan refugees who resettled in Canada are remarkably successful and a big benefit to Canada.

You should actually like the "owns guns because he doesn't trust fascists" part. Isn't that what the 2nd Amendment absolutists always say? That if you disarm the populace there's nothing to stop the state from depriving you of all your other rights?

More catching up on this: Mamdani's nutcase father has published an "Idi Amin not so bad" book. Good Lord. I had a friend in law school who grew up in Canada. He was of India/South Asian ancestry; his ancestors had immigrated to Uganda, and his parents were Uganda citizens. The same as Mamdani. Idi Amin stripped people of Indian ancestry of their Ugandan citizenship. He "deported" citizens born and raised there.This was literally a textbook example of a gross human rights violation when I was in law school. Those who tried to stay didn't fare so well. Dad is nuts, and unfortunately son inherited that.

All true. Let's take a step back. Is it a good thing that all these companies seem to think that they need to spend shareholder dollars on this in order to keep on the good side of the biggest grudgeholder in the world? American politics today. And of course they'll be lining up to fund the Obama library or whatever too. Fine and dandy for individual donors, but for publicly traded companies this is donating shareholder money. And if challenged, the reason would be "it's a small investment to make sure that we stay on the good side of Trump."

I just got caught up on some of the latest NYC mayor race shenanigans. What an awful set of candidates, each one representing what is worst in American politics. Michael Bloomberg, where is your protege? Is there one? Or is that age just plain over.

I really can't understand how people with a strong connection to Buffalo and WNY (almost everyone here) isn't in favor of this. The impact of restraints on trade may be generally a bad thing for America, but it is definitely a really, really bad thing for Buffalo.

I'm sticking to more basic, less edgy humor for a bit.

How does this suggest that Reagan wasn't a free trade advocate? The problem here is that some part of what remains of Trump's brain still wants to claim he's a Republican and the successor to the most successful Republican President since Teddy Roosevelt. He isn't.

He or JD should have adopted a cat from the Springfield OH shelter. Now that would've been an epic troll ...

True. And advice for Trump rivals, whether Republican or Democrat: You Will Never Out-Trump Trump. So stop trying. This is one thing they should have learned by now.

At least he's nominally qualified and apparently not an RFK fringe nut. That's what it's come down to for me. Could've been a lot worse. Not high praise ...

Umm, no. It is (well, should be) beneath our political leaders to post stupid joke memes like this or like dumping feces on protesters. I get what Newsom is doing - trying to out-Trump Trump - but I don't like it.

I read the transcript, and I find nothing wrong with Ontario's take on Reagan the Free Trader. It was one of his proudest accomplishments. There's nothing in Reagan's history of the occasional use of tariffs in particular sectors that would justify the rise of a nominally Republican Tarriff Man. By the way, a hissy fit like Trump's latest is now "masculine?"

Beane has been so obsessed with getting that big receiver that he overreaches. Kelvin Benjamin: embarrassing bust. Gabe Davis: great value draft pick, faded fast Coleman: entering bust territory This can happen when you get into a mentality that's like "we're really good, all we need to do is to add a big #1 receiver and an excellent CB." You forget that we also desperately need run-stopping DTs, LBs, a speedburner at receiver ... enough things other than QB and lead RB that it still makes sense to take the best player available.

Not saying we're a good run defense, but we're 6 games in a a couple really long breakaway runs will do that ...

Not bad. We do know that Trump hates pets. Another reason to distrust him.