Jump to content

The Frankish Reich

Community Member
  • Posts

    13,322
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

5,835 profile views

The Frankish Reich's Achievements

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer (8/8)

6.7k

Reputation

  1. A new world in which everything - even a benediction - is a grift.
  2. Absolutely. I said before: I had no problem pardoning those who just kind of waltzed in, walked around, and took a few pics. The prosecution made the point: it was against the law, and people should remember that in the future. But these blanket pardons (and I include Biden's pardons of "nonviolent drug offenders") are a terrible idea. Every case is different. The facts should be looked at, at least for a few minutes.
  3. If there's one thing we've learned this week it's that we have an embarrassing lack of decent clergy in America.
  4. I believe God saved him, but only at the cost of the sacrifice of Corey Comperatore A real, honest-to-God LOL here!
  5. I haven't commented about the other pardons because (sadly) they're really not that shocking anymore. But this one is utterly inexplicable to me. The guy was an international drug dealer on an epic scale. I read this a couple years ago, and anyone who cares about crypto, drug smuggling, and law enforcement should read it too: https://www.porchlightbooks.com/product/american-kingpin-the-epic-hunt-for-the-criminal-mastermind-behind-the-silk-road--nick-bilton/isbn/9781591848141 Here's a quick passage from an article that the author turned into the book: Green [one of Ulbricht's henchmen] forwarded one troubling customer service complaint from a woman whose brother overdosed on heroin from Silk Road and noted that under the current system, children could use the site. Perhaps that was a hair too much freedom, Green said. DPR [Ulbrich's adopted codename] erupted: “THAT’S MY WHOLE IDEA!” Any constraints would destroy the fundamental concept, he said, and refused any assistance for the grieving sister. And yet Green stayed on, despite the insensitivity and ethical contradictions, becoming one of Silk Road’s most trusted employees. https://www.wired.com/2015/04/silk-road-1/ A mega drug bazaar. A fantastic law enforcement investigation. A righteous conviction of a guy who is on record as not caring one whit that the poisons hawked on his marketplace were killing people and even could be accessed by children. Today he stands free and pardoned of any offense. Just because, you know, crypto. Remember that the next time Trump talks about fentanyl and Mexico and whatever other "tough on drugs" talk he wants to distract you with. He just pardoned the CEO of the biggest illegal drug marketplace the world has ever known.
  6. Not a Roman Salute, an Asperger Salute!
  7. The part about states suing the government. Ill-considered? Well, because the creep who killed Laken Riley had previously committed a petty theft, the law became "theft = mandatory detention." If Laken Riley's killer had previously committed a tax fraud, would it be "tax fraud = mandatory detention?" What does theft have to do with him being a rapist killer? And there's categories of offenders who are left out who may pose more of a risk to future Laken Rileys. In other words: poorly thought-out/knee-jerk reaction laws.
  8. Let's watch that in full motion video, shall we? Now watch how Il Duce did it!
  9. Could we please change the damn map to call Greenland "America's Land" already? And make sure to use that Mercator projection that makes it look really really big. How he can sit there in the Oval Office, look at the map of NYC, and live with the fact that he was born in Queens is beyond me.
  10. I haven't toured Virginia wineries in quite some time, but they were just getting really good when I was there in the 90s. Glad to see that trend has continued! Congrats (again)
  11. It is done. But unfortunately (dare I say like most victim-named legislation?) parts of the law are ill-considered. Because, well, they weren't really "considered" because everyone's afraid of "being against Laken's law" I'd read the Reason article. The one thing that is utterly unworkable is the provision that would allow a state to sue the federal government. There's also the fact that as written the statute would seem to apply to someone charged and found not guilty of a minor shoplifting offense, or even someone who was charged with the charges subsequently dropped because the cops found out they had the wrong guy. Just not well thought-out at all.
  12. Remember, Babylon Bee is run by some kind of fundamentalist Christians who probably eschew alcohol. What kind of dolt would think it's insulting to say that she's Wine Enthusiast's Person of the Year? I would give my left nut to be Wine Enthusiast's Person of the Year.
  13. Well, here's one that I think was a bad law, sold on an apparently false premise. And guess what? You'll probably agree about this one with respect to the first name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard_and_James_Byrd_Jr._Hate_Crimes_Prevention_Act
×
×
  • Create New...