Deranged Rhino

(Second video -- but both are good)

Lots of people now rushing to the "See! RR was always a good guy!" take. Which, again, may be right. I haven't a clue and gave up trying to decipher it. I like Lee Smith's take on him personally, that he's neither. He's a bureaucrat who was used by both sides until he finally chose Barr over Comey (after Barr forced his hand).

100% that would have been great.

That move by Bernie was hilarious -- and right out of an episode of Curb Re Styer: He's not a decent guy, by any measure. He's one of the worst ones on that stage. This is funny though:

Yup.

Thread on Powell's interview: And the link to the interview: Holy cow -- if true, and I have no reason to suspect it's not, that's game set and match.

They still don't get why he won...

Unidentified submerged objects -- the tic-tack UFO the Navy caught was able to go in and out of the water without losing speed (over 100 knots underwater).

Undoubtedly some of the sightings over the years have been misidentified as "alien" when they're our own tech, some more secret than others. No question about that. But we also now live in a world where the US Government and USN have admitted (for the first time) that there are real UFOs and USOs operating in our atmosphere which Navy jets have caught on film. Those might end up being our own tech too -- but it seems unlikely based on their abilities. The question that leads me to though is does anyone believe that the "tic-tack" UFOs (which were captured on video in 2014 and 2009 I think) are the only UFOs that have ever been studied by our own government and others? And if it's not, which I think is likely, then why did this one get disclosed/revealed while the others have been hidden behind red tape and bureaucracy for decades?

Bob Mueller and three other investigations disagree. It was never real. No collusion, no conspiracy. No connection. You've been had. And the funny part is, you know you've been had. But you can't back down from your position.

Just curious what lies you think I've shared? Was it a lie to say, from the start, that Trump/Russia was fiction? Nope. Turns out that was entirely true. Was it a lie to say, from the beginning, that elements of the USIC was working to illegally spy on the candidate/president in an attempted coup? Nope. Turns out that was true. Was it a lie to say, from the beginning, that the fix was in for Clinton's election in 2016? Nope. Turns out it was, as we've seen unfold over the course of the last three years. Have I gotten some details wrong in regards to the biggest, most complex scandal in US/world political history? Absolutely. I'm just one guy wading through an ocean of spin. But would any logical person classify those as lies? I wouldn't, as they weren't intentional and when shown to be wrong I've always done my best to own it. A bigger question: You're so upset about lies, I wonder why you haven't lashed out at CNN/MSNBC/Fox/CBS/ABC/NYTs/WaPo et al , or Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi et al, who all lied to you, intentionally, for three years about Trump being a Russian agent. In fact, you're not upset by these lies, as you still believe them to be true. "It's easier to fool someone than convince to them they have been fooled." Twain You should tattoo that to your forehead.