Deranged Rhino

It's a valid point to consider... The rally tonight will be interesting in terms of gauging the temperature of the administration. They (the people/base/voters on the left) have been led astray by a nefarious media complex and the coup plotters in the IC/DC. They don't know up from down at the moment. Just look at Bob's posts as evidence. Our reality has bifurcated, it's really an amazing (and dangerous) thing to be aware of. There are two separate realities in existence right now, both convinced their side is right and the other is wrong. But facts are stubborn things, and one side has all the facts while the other has "mind reading" and innuendo mixed with painful cognitive dissonance. We're at a tipping point. The next 10 months will determine a lot in terms of the longevity of the republic itself, let alone the bigger issue of globalism v nationalism.

This has been posted before. It will be posted again. But it's perfect for what's actually happening right now.

While I appreciate the sentiment that there's a uniparty, I don't find it a compelling argument or analysis of the past 4 years. You have to look at the impeachment in full context of what's been happening. What's happening is global, it's not confined to this country alone or its institutions. 44 should be called. Let's do it.

No, please don't misunderstand. My position is that there is no difference between Dem/Rep. That's a trick, a dodge, used to pit us, the people, against one another. It's bread and circus for the mob. There is an establishment, which is bi-partisan in composition. That's who has been dividing the country. That's who is fighting Trump (and has been from day one). It's not just the democrats being bad while the republicans are angels -- by any stretch. Go back and look at YouTube clips of the election coverage from all the major media outlets (when you have time to kill of course). If you do, and are honest, you'll see that the attacks came from day one, with vitriol and falsehoods sold as facts, and it was designed to divide the country and make anyone who spoke out against the narrative they were building (Trump/Russia) toxic. Trump didn't do that. The media and the establishment politicians did it. The benefits of being a writer by trade Have to write fast to hit those deadlines

Honestly, who divided the country more? Trump and his tweets or the media who went all in, accusing the President of being a traitor (punishable by death) for four years without any evidence. They knowingly lied, with the specific intent of dividing the country. Calling anyone who dared question their evidence-less case as Putin supporter, Nazi, or traitor themselves. Trump punches back. He doesn't punch first. Plenty of people find his tweets off putting and his mannerism in general. But he's not the one dividing the country. It's the media and the establishment who are fighting for their lives and (rightly) view Trump as an existential threat to their way of life.

Catching up on the thread... You know I have nothing against you, Shady. I don't mind your bomb throwing, not sure why but it cracks me up. This is an attempt to be serious though, because what you raise is a very important point. Trump, unlike presidents of past, pulled us from the brink of war, he did not bring us to it. The establishment brought us to the brink, and praised Trump lavishly when he fired missiles into Syria and toed the neocon/neoliberal line on war. He literally ran on the opposite plank. He ran on getting us out of endless wars, of stopping regime change -- that's a huge threat to a major revenue stream for countless groups with enormous power. From the Military Industrial complex and contractors, to the Intelligence industrial complex (globally), to sitting members of Congress and the Senate itself. This is why he's been attacked from day one by all of those groups, using psy-op weapons on the American population during that fight. You've got the situation completely backwards on that point. The one thing you cannot accuse Trump of being is a war monger. He's had to bend over backwards to avoid the traps set by people in the Pentagon, Langley, and capital cities across the globe which were designed to bring us into war. It's not obstruction to take the spat between branches to the third branch, the courts. To imply that it is obstruction is incredibly dangerous to the long term viability of our republic. (Which is why Schiff and Pelosi and Schumer are pushing that talking point so hard). We have three branches of government for this explicit purpose. Throw your bombs all you want, but at least understand that what you're advocating for is a complete undoing of the republic and the constitution itself. Don't let your emotions get the better of you and make you abandon common sense. See the post above re: soldiers. No president in recent memory has done more to protect, support, and defend the troops. He's the first president who hasn't sent them into harms way to fill the coffers of the MiC. Obama can't say that. Bush can't say that. Clinton can't say that. HW Bush can't say that. Reagan can't say that... As for the fixing the swamp in three years -- well, that's just missing the forest through the trees. How many senators and congressmen retired post 2016? Over 45. How many major CEOs of important companies stepped down since 2017? It's in the 1000s now. We've seen major bad guys, and more importantly their financing networks, get taken off the board starting in November of 2017 with the KSA purge. Plus, you know, there's this: Make no mistake, that's what's really happening. And there has been undeniable progress made that would never have been made without 45 in office. Turning to Bob now... The irony of you writing the bolded, while still clinging to the belief that Trump/Russia is real is HIGH comedy. If you're not in favor of schemes attempting to "misinform voters", why didn't you speak up when the evidence came flooding in that the previous administration was engaged in EXACTLY that in the final months of 2016 with the specific intent to interfere with the US election? I have yet to hear you express your disgust that the FBI/DOJ lied to the FISA court 17 times in order to illegally frame and get a warrant on an innocent american citizen (Page), not because they saw him as a threat (they knew he was an active CIA asset in fact, who had just helped bust a ring of Russian spies in NYC), but because they wanted to use him to get illegal surveillance on their opposition campaign? Where is your outrage over Schiff's numerous lies about having concrete proof of collusion? Or the lies in his memo where he accused Nunes of lying before the IG proved that it was Schiff and the democrats who were lying? You haven't said boo about any of that... why? Is it because your outrage stops at the partisan line? Who is the head of the Justice Department? That's right. It's POTUS. The phone transcript is not incomplete by any measure. You're just proving how little you've thought about this for yourself and how quickly you blindly swallowed down the lies spewed by the very same people who lied to your face about Trump/Russia. The irony is thick in this post. Quick, do you think the Democrat House members who rushed through a partisan impeachment (first in history) without evidence or even accusing the sitting president of a crime, were just "looking for a way to impeach without evidence?" Or does your outrage stop at the partisan line? (there's a theme here, Bob. You're not an independent thinker. You're a partisan hack. Nothing more.)

I have a sneaking suspicion I'll be made to watch by the lady of the house.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1222272542989221888

https://mobile.twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1222248497870753792

I do. He’s earned it with his hostility and complete cowardice displayed the past three years when he’s been shown the evidence — and chose to ignore it.

He says the last two paragraphs with a straight face while EVERYONE on his side has screamed that any investigation into Biden’s corruption is a waste of time. How does Bob hold those two diametrically opposed views in his head simultaneously? Because he’s uninformed, programmed, and refuses to think for himself.

He's been programmed so subtly and efficiently he's become that which he claims to be fighting. That's what happens when you go through life refusing to think for yourself.

Like Bob is... He's just too high to understand the difference.

You've been consistently wrong in your position, you mean. That's not the same thing, Bob. ********

Have you asked yourself that question yet, Bob? About Trump/Russia? Of course you haven't. Which makes everything you're posting such HIGH comedy You don't know the subject matter, you've repeated proven lies as if they were facts, and you still hold strong to a long debunked conspiracy theory about Russia. You have ZERO credibility to be taken seriously on this topic. But it sure is fun to watch you stagger around thinking you have a point to make.

Thread for consideration:

Gary is so deeply stupid he thinks people are complaining that Rick Wilson insulted half the country. They're not. They're happy that CNN and Rick Wilson still haven't learned why Trump won in 16 and are doubling down on their own doom. 2020 is going to be hilarious for deeply stupid people like Gary.

https://www.nbcnews.com/video/trump-and-president-of-ukraine-say-there-was-no-pressure-to-investigate-biden-69894725895