Deranged Rhino

Shocking that Demings doesn't have her facts right. It's almost like the House managers have been lying to the public for so long they don't know up from down.

You don't even know the basic facts of the two biggest political stories of the past half decade: Trump/Russia and Trump/Ukraine. You're uninformed. Relevance: This is the man leading the impeachment case. His word is worthless. He's a proven liar and manipulator.

Then why did all 17 (of the 18) witnesses refuse to state that they believed an impeachable offense or crime was committed at that time? Try to answer that one without collapsing into yourself like a dying star.

Jake is lying. Read the letter, ALF. There's no threat.

She's the face of globalism, and why people are rejecting it in full.

It's amazing because that's a BASIC fact. And Bob doesn't know it, despite riding his high horse. Most would call Bob an asshat for that. As would I.

Holy cow... Bob doesn't know Clinton paid for the dossier and thinks G-Pop did? You can't make this up.

Evidence and facts don't agree with your take, or the 150 million people. Emotions aren't facts. Emotions aren't evidence. Things we learn in basic civics classes, but Bob is still struggling with.

He can't. @Bob in Mich's brain is as broken as Gary's. TDS is terminal if left untreated. Just wait until November when Bob realizes he has 4 more years left of Trump.

Investigating corruption is not contrary to national policy. In fact, Ukraine and the US have a treaty mandating precisely that. Using caps to make a point does not make your point any more intelligent. There's ZERO evidence that Trump did it for corrupt purposes, the preponderance of evidence, in fact, shows otherwise. Unless you engage in mind reading... which you're fine with because you're more emotional than you are intelligent at this point. None of those witnesses thought it was impeachable when asked directly during their testimony. None. But details are hard when you don't know the facts of the issue you're debating. His son's employer. You're disputing an uncontested fact because you're not a smart person.

the video was posted earlier, but should be watched. careful what you wish for, dems.

Gary, still three steps behind. Because he refuses to think for himself. *************

No one has a real problem with people not knowing all the facts or nuances. That's more than understandable and acceptable. The issue is when people like @Bob in Mich come down and claim they DO know all of the information and make sweeping proclamations that anyone who disagrees with him is doing so because they're not interested in the "full truth" -- and then it turns out they don't know the information themselves. That's the issue. I, as an example, am always happy to discuss (at length) the nuances and facts with people who are honest about their desire to learn, rather than those who plug their ears and run from any information which runs counter to their programming.

...Because they're not anti-trafficking organizations, but perpetrators themselves more than likely.