Deranged Rhino

hmmm

Good thread here from a good pollster:

Bye, Joe.

For clarity: I still don’t. Polls are narrative shaping tools, not accurate prognosticators. I don’t know, hence the question. Six months ago you were certain that not only Biden would win, but that Trump would lose to anyone who they put up against him. I assume this confidence was borne from something beyond your personal take. The point though, is that wherever that confidence in Joe came from (and it was being injected into the bloodstream by the establishment press at that time), anyone who took two seconds to really look at Joe knew he had no chance. Including those media outlets. I just wonder when you start holding whatever sources you’re relying on for news/information accountable for always getting it wrong? (not a shot at you, it’s a shot at those sources) I don’t doubt that at all. That’s not the opinion I’m talking about. I’m talking specifically about the confidence in Joe.

Honest question: As an attorney, who took an oath to support the constitution, do you not find it alarming that the director of the FBI and his chief counsel committed egregious enough violations of their duties to be under criminal investigation? Or do the implications of that kind of abuse from the most powerful law enforcement officer in the country (and his entire senior staff) not even register? Just business as usual? Take the politics out of it. This is a civil liberty issue, a constitutional issue, as well as a national security issue.

(Direct link to the video: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/graham-vows-to-call-witnesses-in-accelerating-probe-of-fisa-failures/ )

Everyone in that quoted text was referred for criminal investigation by that OIG report. The entire upper echelon of the FBI/DOJ was. This was confirmed in Horowitz's senate testimony and subsequent Barr statements. You're 0-1 so far. And once again demonstrating your complete ignorance of what is actually happening with regards to this subject.

To the point: Gary just has his latest talking point and he's eager to take it for a spin before he checks out its merit. Because he doesn't think for himself, he just parrots, trolls, then runs and hides when he gets challenged. Rinse, lather, repeat.

Prosecution rested today — and CPL won’t take the stand. Flashback: https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1226971982178267136

I just posted in the Ukraine thread a sentiment that can be applied here.

100%. I still maintain 4mer’s position is the most likely based on history, precedent, and what you just stated here. We will see soon enough. There’s so much evidence now that it’s impossible to ignore without a concerted team effort on the bad guys’ parts and the administration letting them get away with it. If that’s how it’s going to go down, we have big problems ahead. It’s definitely a possibility. I’m just not there yet.

And when they’re indicted, Crayola will claim otherwise — because he’s dishonest.

I do, because as I’ve told you for almost a year now, they don’t have anyone who can beat Trump. You found that idea laughable. Now it’s not... Whose position is changing again? I tried to warn you what’s coming. Now turnout doesn’t matter. Polls don’t matter. So what are you basing your confidence in? What the media has told you? The same media that swore to you (lied to you) for the past three years that Trump and Russia colluded? The same media that lied to you over and over with “this time we got Trump” click bait? Look, I understand you are of a different political persuasion than Trump, that’s beside the point. You have every right to vote for whomever you wish for whatever reason you wish — what confuses me is why you continue to put your faith in those who have proven themselves to be entirely dishonest on all things Trump/political?

Of course Crayola is forgetting that the guilty aren’t all politicians. The heads of our intel agencies, the DOJ and FBI are not politicians. But details don’t matter to a guy like him. Who values nothing about this country or it’s constitution despite being a “lawyer”. He’s a waste of time.

It's global -- and largely going on without anyone reporting on it. Worthwhile/entertaining thread: + More

No chance Joe. (He never had a chance, @transplantbillsfan -- because he's a terrible candidate with more skeletons in his closet than IQ points)

I think it's too early to feel confident in the bolded. With impeachment gone, the investigation into Biden can begin in earnest (and seem to be). It's not just Joe who got dirty in the Ukraine, the whole lot of 'em were (both sides of the aisle), and that's why they're so terrified.

Start in 2016 and go forward. They're a blast to go back through and see how ahead of the game this board was on what you now take as a given. But you won't, because you lack honesty and don't care about yourself or your country. You're a waste of carbon, and you bragged about it.

Thanks for the honesty. You don't care about the country, the republic, or your individual sovereignty. As a lawyer, that's pretty... ***** sad. Enjoy what's coming.