Deranged Rhino

That whole fiasco is (obviously) a much longer discussion -- but that was not an uncommon assumption, even within the honest parts of the IC.

This is entirely accurate. NBC came after Jeff hard but he (as usual) was right. They were wrong.

Are you under the impression he was just making up stuff about the drug from out of the blue rather than repeating what he'd been briefed on by the doctors and experts? Trump, being Trump, lacks the precision of a doctor when he speaks -- but it's becoming more and more apparent that he wasn't giving false hope in the slightest as many doctors are now using the meds to save lives.

The problem with Harris (for progressives) is her history as a prosecutor. She won't win over enough of the Bernie tent (imo) to make a difference. I don't doubt she's on the short list, though.

Lee is (likely) referring to this as well:

Answer: No. Mueller was not needed. Unless you were a democrat, then he was -- so he could be used to interfere in the 2018 election.

Hint: They knew before Mueller was appointed.

Nunes chimes in:

I wonder if @BullBuchanan thinks redacted portions of the IG report are "conspiracy theories" too rather than hard evidence / primary source material...

Grassley/Johnson respond: FBI Ignored Early Warnings that Debunked Anti-Trump Dossier was Russian Disinformation Apr 10, 2020 Declassified footnotes sought by Grassley, Johnson reveal faulty predicate in Russia probe WASHINGTON – The “central and essential” evidence used to justify invasive surveillance of an American citizen in the FBI’s probe into Russian interference was, itself, an example of Russian interference, according to once-secret footnotes declassified at the urging of two U.S. Senators. The footnotes, part of the Justice Department Inspector General’s postmortem of the FBI’s flawed operation to spy on Trump campaign aide Carter Page, were released just hours after Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) renewed their push for transparency. The senators expect a fuller declassification in the coming days. The footnotes reveal that, beginning early on and continuing throughout the FBI’s Russia investigation, FBI officials learned critical information streams that flowed to the dossier were likely tainted with Russian Intelligence disinformation. But the FBI aggressively advanced the probe anyway, ignoring internal oversight mechanisms and neglecting to flag the material credibility concerns for a secret court. Despite later intelligence reports that key elements of the FBI’s evidence were the result of Russian infiltration to undermine U.S. foreign relations, the FBI still pushed forward with its probe. It would eventually spill over into the years-long special counsel operation, costing taxpayers more than $30 million and increasing partisan divisions – all based on faulty evidence. In the end, the special counsel concluded that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russia. “For years, the public was fed a healthy diet of leaks, innuendo and false information to imply that President Trump and his campaign were part of a Russian conspiracy to spread disinformation. The FBI’s blind pursuit of the investigation, despite exculpatory and contradictory information, only legitimized the narrative. The mounting evidence undercutting this narrative should have stopped the investigation early in its tracks. Instead, it took several years and millions in taxpayer dollars to conclude that the allegations were baseless,” Grassley and Johnson said. “Had FBI leadership heeded the numerous warnings of Russian disinformation, paid attention to the glaring contradictions in the pool of evidence and followed long-standing procedures to ensure accuracy, everyone would have been better off. Carter Page’s civil liberties wouldn’t have been shredded, taxpayer dollars wouldn’t have been wasted, the country wouldn’t be as divided and the FBI’s reputation wouldn’t be in shambles. “It’s ironic that the Russian collusion narrative was fatally flawed because of Russian disinformation. These footnotes confirm that there was a direct Russian disinformation campaign in 2016, and there were ties between Russian intelligence and a presidential campaign – the Clinton campaign, not Trump’s.” The IG report detailed how the FBI’s application for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on Page relied heavily on an unverified dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele on behalf of Fusion GPS, which was conducting opposition research for the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee. According to Footnote 302, in October 2016, FBI investigators learned that one of Steele’s main sources was linked to the Russian Intelligence Service (RIS), and was rumored to be a former KGB/SVR officer. However, the FBI neglected to include this information in its application, which the FISA court approved that same month. Two months later, investigators learned that Glenn Simpson, the head of Fusion GPS, told a Justice Department attorney that he assessed the same source “was a RIS officer who was central in connecting Trump to Russia.” In January, the FISA warrant was renewed. Footnote 350 states that, in 2017, the FBI learned that intelligence reports “assessed that the referenced subset [of Steele’s reporting about the activities of Michael Cohen] was part of a Russian disinformation campaign to denigrate U.S. foreign relations.” That same footnote states that a separate report, dated 2017, “contained information … that the public reporting about the details of Trump’s [REDACTED] activities in Moscow during a trip in 2013 were false, and that they were the product of RIS ‘infiltra[ing] a source into the network’ of a [REDACTED] who compiled a dossier of information on Trump’s activities.” The surveillance warrant against Page was renewed two more times – in April and in June of 2017 – raising questions about when exactly the FBI received and reviewed these new intelligence reports, and what it did with them. Grassley and Johnson expect the footnotes to be further declassified in the coming days. Citing the IG report, the FISA court ordered the FBI to explain how it will take corrective action on the FISA process. A subsequent IG audit of the FBI procedures to ensure accuracy of FISA applications found errors in 29 unrelated applications, prompting the court to order more information from the FBI. The declassified footnotes were contained in an April 2, 2020, letter from the Justice Department responding to Grassley and Johnson’s January 28, 2020, inquiry. And -- for the record, this is where I remain: That is the cover story. Not that there wasn't Russian disinfo seeded into "Steele's" memos -- there were -- but that it wasn't the driving force behind the frame job. That came from 44, HRC, and the DOJ/FBI/CIA. The Russian disinfo was a tool used during their coup, not the reason for their coup.

Funny how all the sources who got every bit of the Russian story wrong (and won awards for it) are so eager to push mail in voting. Should tell you everything you need to know about the “why now” of it all.

Yet ANOTHER talking point bites the dust. (Re trump taxes) https://mobile.twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1248706272469360640

:beer: That coup was so egregious in its audacity, the failure of the media to cover it properly was one of the big “wake up” moments for my own personal growth.