Deranged Rhino

The treasonous senator ignores the fact the WHO tests were bunk, and some were carriers of the virus itself. But who needs facts and details when you're on the CCP payroll and working to undermine your government?

Correct. But he's not interested in accuracy or truth, only having what he WANTS to be true to be validated. Because: feelz are more important than truth. Meanwhile: (Ignore the actual evidence -- focus on the manufactured story instead. That's how low information people are controlled)

In context: He can grab them by the *****. Out of context (your stance): He does grab them by the *****. But again, when you're so angry at the truth that you continue to fall back on those who lied to your face for three years about Russia/Trump, you get what you deserve. Which, in this case, is to be woefully under informed and hypocritical.

Like I said. You're in denial of reality. Everything I've discussed with you about Trump/Russia turned out to be entirely accurate, whereas your position has been shown to be 100% incorrect. Yet, you get mad at me for sharing information rather than whatever sources you rely on to get your information who blatantly lied to you for the past three years. That's a "you" problem. Like not being able to discern the difference between an out of context audio clip and actual visual evidence of assault.

3 years later and you're still reading me wrong. (Just like you still likely think the Russia narrative was real)

As an adult man, I know the difference between talk and action. Joe's on tape, assaulting women and children countless times -- on top of Reade's allegation. One is not like the other... unless you're a partisan.

First we find out he got dirty in Ukraine, now we're seeing his true loyalty doesn't lie with the USA, but with the CCP. Good work, CT.

Remember, this is the spin attempt by the guilty parties now: "It wasn't deliberate, we were duped!" Look back at the evolution of the denials: 2017: "It's a totally legit investigation! Look at all those Russian contacts! The Steele Dossier is 100% accurate! Besides, there's no way the FBI would overstep or abuse the FISC! The FBI isn't political!" 2018: "So, all those Russian contacts suddenly look less damning, but that's only because we don't know what the FBI knows! The Steele Dossier is likely 99% accurate! Just wait for Mueller! And besides, the FBI would never overstep, act politically, or abuse the FISC! That's just a conspiracy theory without evidence!" 2019/Post Mueller: "... Since when was this ever about Russia collusion? And what's the Steele Dossier nonsense you keep harping about?! That's a right wing talking point meant to obfuscate! The real crime was OBSTRUCTION! Just look at Volume II (and ignore Volume I)! Besides, the FBI didn't act with bias, and would never abuse the FISC! Investigators sometimes get ahead of the evidence, but that's called playing a hunch!" 2020/Post Horowitz: "Okay, so the FBI overstepped and broke the law to abuse the FISC, and yeah there was a lot of POSSIBLE bias and political animus -- but the real story isn't any of that. The real story is PUTIN! He duped the FBI with an insidious disinformation campaign! Those cagey Russians were trying to steal the election by feeding Christopher Steele and the FBI fake intelligence! It's not the FBI's fault, or Obama's, or Clapper's, or Brennan's -- it's Putin's fault! We were duped!" That's the only defense Comey, Clapper, Brennan, and Obama have left to muster. And they're going with it hard. It's fiction though. The reality is, Obama/Clapper/Brennan/Comey knowingly sought out the disinformation in order to bolster the narrative they already concocted out of the FBI-CID and Langley. They created the "narrative", paid for it to be spread far and wide, and sprinkled in information they knew to be disinformation just to give their coup the air of plausibility (and themselves an out should it go teets up). This line of defense is their out, designed to cover up their illegal actions take in the weeks/months/years prior to Downer meeting G-Pop in a bar. It's a key difference that even some good journalists are overlooking. Durham won't though.

The thirstiest cover letter in political history: Abrams offers Joe's ticket nothing. Not one thing.

What’s funny is your willingness to ignore countless counts of visual evidence for Joe, while being so outraged over an out of context sound byte between two dudes big talking one another. It’s kind of like being outraged about someone running for office who once talked about robbing a bank, yet never did — then turning around and voting for Bonnie and Clyde.

https://mobile.twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1250200978810437632

Joes got way more than one. Most on film. ********* “Progressives” are having none of Joe. https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1250242440407195649 No Chance Joe.

She’s owned by China (at least her husband is).

Why defend him? He's truly not worth it, and his endorsement of Joe is a sell out move pure and simple. It wasn't done for the progressive cause. How does laying down with neoliberals (who are just neocons), who have been dangerously wrong at every turn on civil liberties, due process, foreign policy, and have never once "led" the way on any meaningful progressive platform (they led from behind on gay marriage, from behind on ending regime change, from behind even on health care)? It does nothing to help the progressive movement -- especially when you're talking about SCOTUS picks. Why would the neoliberal/neocon wing pick someone other than a puppet for their own agendas (as they've done every time the past 30 years)? Joe is establishment through and through -- same cloth as Clinton, Bush, and Obama. None were progressive champions, despite the PR.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/492405-ag-barr-just-signaled-that-things-are-about-to-get-ugly-for-the-russia

Cuomo showing he's dishonest -- even with himself: