Deranged Rhino

That's the only way Joe'd have a chance. But she won't do it. (and if she did, her husband is about to get detonated with the biggest scandal in United States history -- so her name is about to be Mudd)

*Warning -- the images are of children. It's a way of pedos to share content on Google/YouTube.

Shh. It's fine. It's fine. Don't worry, think about your safety, not what we're doing with this data...

So, you admit you're as original as you are dumb. Got it. Way to trot out old slams from 2014 and think you're breaking comedic ground.

They still don't get why Trump won. (and because of that, he's going to win again)

There's literally nothing you're right about, is there?

Barr made a very interesting comment here: Whole thing is worth a listen -- but he said Durham is not restrained by the timing of the election because none of his targets are candidates or connected to candidates. We're in a 7-10 day window for action per some reports -- I'm personally still skeptical of the first indictments dropping within that time frame, but it's "out there in the ether" at the moment. Edit: Here's the segment: HH: Now Mr. Attorney General, I want to close with a couple of specific issues. The investigation of U.S. Attorney John Durham into the circumstances surrounding the surveillance of President Trump’s campaign, transition, and early administration, does that investigation remain on track undisturbed by the virus? WB: Yes. HH: There are guidelines concerning the announcement of indictments or the closing of the investigations prior to the election. When is that deadline for U.S. Attorney Durham? And do you think he will make it either to disclose indictments or to disclose that the investigation is over? WB: As far as I’m aware, none of the key people that, whose actions are being reviewed at this point by Durham, are running for president. HH: But would not the announcement of indictments after a time certain have an impact on an election of the sort that the U.S. Attorney’s manual recommends against? WB: Well, what is the sort that the attorney manual recommends against? HH: As I recall, this came up with Director Comey making his announcement, and the concerns in 2016 that he had acted improvidently during the run up to the election. I don’t recall what the exact timing is. WB: Yeah, well, that was directly as to a candidate. HH: And so it would not matter, in your view, if there is an investigation, and the day before the election, someone is indicted? WB: Well, you know, I think in its core, the idea is you don’t go after candidates. You don’t indict candidates or perhaps someone that’s sufficiently close to a candidate, that it’s essentially the same, you know, within a certain number of days before an election. But you know, as I say, I don’t think any of the people whose actions are under review by Durham fall into that category. HH: That’s big news to me. I had assumed that they would be in the category of people that could not be indicted given the obvious connection to President Trump, but I’ll take the news and I’ll put it away. Let me ask you about Senator Grassley. A couple of weeks ago, he tweeted, and this is a direct quote, “We are learning FBI flubs on Carter Page spying case are just tip of iceberg. IG audited 29 other spying applications on Americans and found problems with every one of them, in caps. Constitutional rights are at stake when FBI fails to justify use of spying tools. Reforms needed to protect civil liberties.” Is Senator Grassley correct, Mr. Attorney General? WB: Yes, well, I think as I have said, I think that the failure to follow the guidelines and the requirements in preparing FISA applications, you know, is very disturbing, especially coming as recently as it has. And you know, we shouldn’t proceed with FISA unless we have safeguards and ensure that the law is being scrupulously followed by the FBI. HH: Are you shocked by what you have found to date or have been briefed by U.S. Attorney Durham to date about? WB: I wouldn’t use the word shocked, right? You know, I’m very troubled by it, but you know, I think the reason that we have this investigation is because there are a lot of things that are unexplained. And I think we’re getting deeply into the situation, and we’ll be able to sort out exactly what happened.

Hot mic — the “hoax” part isn’t interesting (John is talking about the LA county study posted yesterday) despite the hype it’s likely to get, it’s the comment that everyone in the White House press core having already been vaccinated. Grain of salt. https://mobile.twitter.com/WayneDupreeShow/status/1252428599686131714

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/lee-smith-china-coronavirus-1

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/lee-smith-china-coronavirus-1

https://mobile.twitter.com/joshdcaplan/status/1252606753008750593

Considering how often you expose your own ignorance and just how uninformed you are (about basic stuff, let alone nuanced stuff), being on your fake news list is a compliment, not a slam.

Another blow to the once almighty ICA: It has been shown to have been complete bunk from top to bottom. Of course, this was known immediately upon reading it as was pointed out in this thread and others in January of 2017... but until recently it had been the Alamo for those people still laboring under the delusion that the Trump/Russia story was ever real. "But the ICA!" they'd cry. This was after clinging to the vaunted Steele dossier for years before it was proven to be nothing but delusional oppo-research run amok. Now, the ICA is under fire. More will come out to show how it was created by Clapper and Brennan to deliberately mislead the American people. The "it was Russian disinformation and we fell for it" gambit is a ruse. It's as phony as the "Trump's a Russian asset" narrative. It's literally their last defense. And it's weak AF. Add this news breaking on the ICA to the bucket of other activity of late... sure sounds like they're preparing the battle field for Durham to do some damage to the CIA, not just DOJ and FBI.

Well, look at that. There's Trump at the podium... Who's surprised?

It's happened to me before too -- a refresh of the browser usually sorts it for me.

Well, would ya look at that...

Making all my fellow Terriers proud!

She had this tweet -- just deleted it. Wonder why?

Thoughts and prayers are with you and yours, KRC.

It does. But he'll get his sentence commuted in that case. Flynn would then get the 11th hour full pardon.

Your own words and position already have, cupcake.