Deranged Rhino

☝️ Says it all, don't it?

So the world's leading health organization saying in mid January that the disease wasn't transmissible human to human (even though they knew that was false) wasn't a problem... Got it.

And note -- all this time, Bull is still running from this very reasonable, and well sourced, discussion on the topic. He won't have an honest conversation about it, because that would risk him having to admit he's wrong, and has been wrong for years. Instead, he wants to throw bombs and memes and hope that if he does enough of that, this post will go away. But it won't, Bull. Until you engage with it honestly.

In mid January the WHO was still telling the world that the virus wasn't transmissible from human to human.

Funny how that meme doesn't list what they were charged with -- or that it hasn't been updated to show that the charges against the only Russians named were dropped due to a faulty foundation. But what do you care about facts when you have a conspiracy theory to push, amirite, Bull?! * Cohen/Manafort/van der Zwaan/Gates -- all convicted of crimes having nothing to do with 2016 * G-Pop -- convicted for lying to FBI agents, not about Trump/Russia, but about himself. * Flynn -- not convicted of anything, and the longer it's been dragged out the more innocent he's become. Oh, and Kilimnik was an Obama State Department source... It's hilarious how unhinged someone gets when their cognitive dissonance gets disturbed with fact. When it's shown that they've believed in pure fiction for three years, and built a political identity around it, it's painful to discover you've been had. That's how you get responses like the above, without a hint of irony

That's not what he was charged with Bull. Read the documents for yourself. He tampered with witnesses in his own case -- and the person he "tampered with" admitted it wasn't tampering. (his own case was not about Trump/Russia)

Your leaving out the China of it all in your analysis. The fact China was lying to the world about the virus while hording PPE surely slowed the response time and ***** up the logistical supply chains more than anything else.

You've gone out of your way to avoid discussing the only actual crime committed: Roger Stone was convicted of a crime that was not Russian collusion/conspiracy. Again, not a single person was found guilty of the central claim you are clinging to -- three years after it's been debunked. And you think you're NOT a conspiracy theorist, Bull? You're pushing one right this very moment. And doing it with absolutely ZERO skill.

You literally laid out 6 fake "facts" in a row without hesitation and I'm the joke? No, sir. You bungled BASIC facts which are undisputed!

You think treason occurred? REALLY?! Treason? Explain your position. He made a joke on stage at the height of the media talking about the hacks. This is the weakest position to hold (so it's no surprise you're still clinging to it). False. He didn't lie about it. 27 hours in front of multiple committees and no perjury charge prove this. The Trump Tower meeting was an arranged meeting by western intelligence sources, not Russian. False. Flynn did not lie about "meeting with Russians". In fact, he didn't lie at all per the FBI. You're wrong about BASIC facts, Bull. Maybe it's time you reassess what you think you know. because so far it's all wrong. You mean, as a sitting US Senator on multiple relevant committees involving foreign policy? You're stretching beyond rationality now... if you had ACTUAL knowledge of this matter you'd understand how silly you're coming across now.

Zero meetings happened between Trump reps and Russian operatives. Zero. Downer isn't a Russian. Mifsud isn't a Russian. NV is a Russian but was a working asset for GPS. None of this is about defending Trump. It's about defending the rule of law and our civil liberties. That's what you fail to see you're fighting against by supporting the abuses that took place in 2016-2018. It's not about partisanship. It's about right and wrong. And you're on the side of people who thought it was fine to illegally spy on their political opposition for the purposes of subverting the US election -- and, in the process, disenfranchising millions of American voters. This is backed up by Volume I of the Mueller report, multiple OIG findings from Horowitz, three congressional investigations, and multiple testimonies to congress from several dozen people involved in the matter.

Which is only an admission by those governors that they don't understand our system of government and how its supposed to work. Which should be more alarming than anything else.

I've provided hundreds of pages of proof. Most in this thread alone. It's called reading And you're still running from a basic question about Trump Tower... why? You should feel confident you are in the right if you know this stuff as well as I do. So let's go. Prove it to me. He's right. Not a single person has been indicted for Russian collusion or conspiracy. Not one. Not even any Russians. (they had their case dropped due to poor legal reasoning and faulty evidence)

And as for this hot sentence of nonsense -- what do you mean "believe in Benghazi"? Are you suggesting four Americans did not die in Benghazi under less than auspicious circumstances?

You're running from the very piles of evidence you claim to be in favor of reading. You've been running from a conversation since the 1st of April. Keep thinking you're enlightened. All you're doing is proving what a joke you are by refusing to engage with the evidence presented to you.

No. You're pushing one right this very moment without realizing it. Again, the "conspiracy theory" is that Trump/Russia was ever real. It never was. But you STILL believe it. Because you've been had. Duped. Conned. And you're too lazy and scared to look into it further to see that for yourself.

You're three hours behind the curve (again). And -- not surprisingly -- backing the wrong horse.

Noted. Facts and origins are irrelevant when you want to have your feelz confirmed.

I'm surprised you had the (small) balls to show back up in a thread you've been hiding from for over two weeks. Just to remind you of what you're running from:

I know the answer. So why don't you tell me. List the meetings they had, and the parties involved, including their ties to Russian intelligence. Go!

Who coined the term "Fake News"? Hint: it wasn't 45. (It was the WaPo -- in relation to what story?)

Note: He never did (because he can't).

And there are conflicting reports (even from otherwise solid folks) that it's a honey trap too. So I really don't know what to make of it other than the timing is real interesting. I'm not a proficient enough technical actor to get into the weeds on vetting hacked data personally, so I'm waiting a bit to see how it shakes out over the next 72 hours.