Deranged Rhino

Already happened. And they got the discovery to prove it happened two weeks ago. Thank you for proving that you don't know the facts of this story, but are just happy to regurgitate talking points which are FAKE.

THIS is how CrowdStrike explains how the hack happened --- LAUGH it up. Think of how many screenshots that would be, think about how long that would take -- and how much time you'd have to be in the system without (per CrowdStike) leaving any evidence of your intrusion at all... It was all bull####. From the very start. The hack wasn't real. It was a leak. The Russia narrative wasn't real. It was projection/distraction. The media coverage was fake. They were in on it. And now you have certain posters still defending it. Still calling evidence like this "right wing" when it's anything but. Why do they do it? Because they're either still asleep, or are active enemies of the republic. Learn who they are. Learn who they're really supporting with these sorts of posts. And remember that it's the duty of the citizens to hold the government responsible. Some are willing to do that work... others are much more willing to be useful idiots for actual evil. Volume 2 was the frame up, dumbass. It was also improper in its foundation, and described obstruction of a crime THEY KNEW did not happen before the probe even started. It's called, entrapment, *****head.

Don’t bother with facts. They’ve chosen, chosen, to remain willfully ignorant. Because they’re more interested in protecting the criminals and subverting the republic than they are restoring it. ***** all of them.

It only does if your understanding of your innate rights and the constitution is as shallow as a dried puddle.

They have nothing left. They can’t argue on the merit of their ideas or principles. They can’t argue on the merits of their policies. They can’t admit they got russia wrong without throwing Obama under the bus. They’re checkmated. As the turnout last night in every special election proved.

The opposite is happening. But to know that you’d have to have the first clue about what’s happening. You’ve proven you don’t. And worse, you’re actively rooting for tyranny over the rule of law. So I don’t give two ***** what you think, but I’ll happily expose you’re bull#### for what it is. Being able to read means no one has to wish. It’s what volume one loudly concludes. Wrong. On both counts. Not even the government could prove he lied, let alone that it undermined anything. He was, in fact, cleared by the DOJ and FBI before that meeting ever took place. Facts aren’t your friends when you don’t know them. Which you don’t because you’re pushing long debunked fake news like the uninformed pissant you are.

Yeah. Ignore the biggest scandal in the history of the county and focus on FEAR in order to help the criminals get away with what they did. Not to Trump, or Flynn — but to every American past and present. ***** off with that absolute garbage of a deflection.

The ICA coming under sustained fire. If that’s shown to be bunk (which it was), the rest collapses. Note the two big revelations this week: 1) Shawn Henry (CrowdStrike) testified there was never any evidence of an intrusion or hacking of the servers. This has been known for years down here, but now is confirmed. 2) Russia wanted Hillary to win because she was “more malleable”. This, of course, was always clear from simple seductive logic. But the fact that it was deliberately withheld from the ICA lays the foundation for a seditious conspiracy charge for Mr. Brennan.

You are literally the one arguing against this principle. You’re just too daft to see it because you’re not thinking clearly.

https://mobile.twitter.com/greggutfeld/status/1260373293758058496 Because they’re not in the truth business. They’ve proven that conclusively.

Someone has chosen to remain willfully ignorant. Jesus.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1260368540722442240

Why? Explain in detail please. Or are you still buying into the conspiracy theory that Trump worked with Russia to steal the 2016 election?

Thread

It changes EVERYTHING in fact. You're arguing for a complete subversion of the western notion of jurisprudence. You're arguing that the onus is on the individual to prove his innocence. That's been the mantra of tyrants since the beginning of time, and why LIBERAL PHILOSOPHY spent hundreds of years fighting for the system we have now. You're 100% incorrect.

In just the past twenty minutes you've posted a completely ignorant take on the legal system and the rule of law, and stated a "fact" that was only off by about 560,000 deaths. You are a joke of a poster, who has no understanding of much of anything. And you seem to enjoy proving that on a daily basis down here. A smarter man would realize what an embarrassment he's become, but you're not a smart man. Or an original one.

Yes, but facts aren't his friend. He proves that each and every day he posts. He's a clown.

And that's why you're a clown.

600,000+ abortions a year in the US. 30-40,0000 gun deaths a year in the US. Someone's REAL bad at math.

You fail to understand the entire foundation of our legal system. It's not "guilty until you prove yourself innocent", it's quite the opposite. The sentiment you're pushing here is the reason WHY we have the system we do. Wrong. Unless you're promoting fascism, which you seem to love to do.