Jump to content

Deranged Rhino

Community Member
  • Posts

    55,851
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Deranged Rhino

  1. When intelligence sharing isn't being politicized, yes. But what's at the bottom of this scandal, what makes it the biggest scandal in US history, is that this kind of political spying and abuse of power was routine in the Obama administration beyond just Mike Flynn and the 2016 election. They used these tools to spy and blackmail their political opponents into going along with their agenda -- whether that be the ACA, the Iran deal, or covering up the last administrations intelligence abuses in Iraq. 44 ran on a platform of trimming back the surveillance state. Instead, he expanded it and weaponized it to use against American citizens who he deemed his political enemy. And he did it with private contractors rather than FBI/IC agents/officers to avoid leaving a paper trail. It would have worked -- had Hillary won. It has been released in full. You can read it for yourself. What they're trying to get is privileged GJ material which is never released.
  2. It was. Just because you don't understand the rule of law, and why they'd want GJ material not to be politicized, doesn't change that fact. It just makes it clear for all who can read that you're an idiot who doesn't have a clue about the details of this case. Please, keep proving that. There was no obstruction. DOJ already ruled. Sorry. You lose again.
  3. We know that there was active surveillance on Flynn prior to the call -- but no one knows for sure when it started. The FBI claimed in the summer of 2016 that they tried, and failed, to get a FISA on Flynn. Which many took (at that time) to mean they never had one -- but there are other (illegal and legal) ways to surveil someone like Flynn without a FISA. That's where 5-Eye's intel sharing comes in. I'm willing to bet the Brits were doing the bulk of the SIGINT work on Flynn prior to 2016 and sharing, illegally, with the Obama administration. Can I prove that at this time? No. But I put it at 75%.
  4. The who said this Calls another guy a "tough guy" for posting ... (check notes) ... a gif of American "tough guy" Billy Crystal. You can't make that kind of idiocy up. TDS is a degenerative condition. Peleton is in the final stages before he transforms from an uninformed troll into his final form:
  5. Motive: Laser pointer: Deflating the (gaslighting) spin Schiff is full of it: Friday motivation:
  6. I completely agree with your sentiment. The point is not to anoint him, but to acknowledge that he’s got a good record of getting results in otherwise dire looking circumstances. And he’s got the respect of people throughout the bureau and in justice. That cuts both ways, of course. Because if he comes up w no indictments (or a meager sacrificial lamb ala scooter Libby) after this — as you expect and history proves is the most rational expectation — it will be hard to argue that he wasn’t up to the task and/or somehow compromised. Jury is still out as to which way it ultimately goes, but the signs for the past 2+ weeks are all very positive. Especially when you consider the information dropped in those weeks is really just a slice of what’s known simply through OS information. But we will see one way or the other soon.
  7. Just go to the early pages of this thread to see the truth of this...
  8. Can confirm this sentiment is real from the people at DOJ/other that I keep in touch with.
  9. To puppet him, and have the executive be run by unelected partisans with extreme agendas who don't have to face public scrutiny. Biden's campaign is literally running on a platform promising this. ... And the DNC wonders why they keep losing. Just want to hear you stand up for your boy. The guy who actually grabs women by the *****, the guy who rode shotgun in the biggest abuse of power in this nation's history, the guy who is so corrupt and full of shite he blames Trump for everything wrong in the country when he spent over 40 years in Congress. Joe doesn't have the moral high ground you expected him to have... Joe doesn't have the mental capacity you expected him to have... Joe doesn't have the scruples needed to contrast against Trump... But there is something Joe has... No Chance to win.
  10. Say what you will about Trump -- he's a narcissist, he's a blowhard, he's truculent, et al -- but he's proven to have almost preternatural political instincts. And right now, he's lining up with that movement you're referencing for the 2020 election. The election was going to be about the economy, (capitalism vs socialism) but the black swan changed that. Now it'll be freedom vs lock down -- and the dems are eager to argue against freedom. It's amazing really when you step back and look at the whole board. These next 6 months are going to be nuts.
  11. Powell to 44: https://sidneypowell.com/media/open-memorandum-to-barack-obama/
  12. Sidney Powell writes a memo to 44 re his recent "leaked" phone call about Flynn: https://sidneypowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Obama-Memo-Edits-NEW-FINAL.pdf
  13. *********************** Lost in this news, Warner loses his power on the committee with Burr stepping down as head too. Win, Win. (For those who've forgotten, Warner was proven to have been negotiating with Russian oligarchs to smear Trump during the SSCI investigation) ******************** She accidentally said the quiet part out loud.
  14. Agreed. This time without him interfering in the election.
×
×
  • Create New...