Deranged Rhino

Case in point: he is not even smart enough to realize what was posted wasn't from Briebart. But from Brian Cates. He can't discern the difference between a twitter handle and a publication. He's that dumb.

But CA is locked down for three more months? Come on now.

Breaks my heart. Thoughts and prayers are with you and your family, MH.

He's tweeting these from Camp David, while meeting with his closest allies in the House. Something's cooking.

He can't address substance. He not only doesn't know it, he's not smart enough to realize he doesn't know it.

It definitely goes higher than Strzok and Pientka. No argument. But I would contend that the 302 is very important as it's a slam dunk, black and white crime that leads not to Strzok and Pientka, but to McCabe, Comey, and Lynch.

Just look at the egos on this board who cannot admit this even today -- now imagine the mansion sized egos of the "4th estate". They can't be honest, because doing so would be to admit that they were wrong and/or lying for three years. So, instead, they double and triple down and HOPE that people are dumb enough to fall for it.

In the launch window.

More on the 302:

That's why you're in for a looooooooong 5 years, friend By supporting Biden, @transplantbillsfan is loudly supporting: * Men who rape women, assault women and children in public settings (let alone in private) * Politicians who use their office to line their own pockets and that of their families * Subverting the notion of a peaceful transition of power * Abusing the surveillance tools of our CT and CI services to spy on political opposition * Regime change, perma-war, and never ending foreign policy blunders. ... He MUST be supporting all these things, because that's No Chance Joe's actual record. He'd rather have ALL THAT just because the media convinced him to turn off his brain because ORANGE MAN BAD

More will come from this one.

For consideration, not endorsing... but he's not alone in saying this. Solomon is saying that within the next 3-4 weeks we're going to be learning more, Nunes said today in an interview that he thinks indictments are coming in the near future (paraphrased). The only thing I know for sure is there are more documents coming. If it's the Flynn 302, which is the rumor, that will open the door to the entire SCO team and its attorneys. One thing said today by Nunes that stood out: it was mentioned that none of the principle targets of Durham (the Strzok, Page, Baker, McCabes of the FBI/DOJ -- not to mention Comey, Clapper, Brennan) have been interviewed yet so indictments can't be that close. Nunes responded by (rightly imo) stating that the evidence is strong enough that they could get indictments without interviewing them. Interviewing them would be a "waste of time" since you know they wouldn't admit anything. The only way interviews would matter is if a perjury charge was the best you were hoping for. Better to drop the hammer and let them turn on one another. That made me smile

As Buffalo_Gal already stated, a 302 is a written report from the interview. They are considered affidavits. Lying in one is a big deal, let alone editing one intentionally to deceive the court. We know there is an original 302 for the Flynn interview, but no one has ever seen it. The FBI has refused to produce it, despite both sets of Flynn's counsel asking for it. We know it exists from Comey's testimony: Despite this, the SCO attorneys have refused to even acknowledge its existence. This is an excellent thread about just how important it was to the SCO to keep this 302 from being subject to discovery: Beyond the 302, there is also the transcript of the Flynn/Kislyak call. This too has never been produced by the SCO, either in this case or in the Mueller report. Instead, only a snippet of the conversation was released with the assurances that it was accurate. Releasing that transcript would be illuminating, but the 302 is much more important (if only to be able to check it against the actual transcript). There are also classification/embarrassment issues that come into play with releasing the transcript, because someone would have to own up to recording the call (someone meaning some agency within the USIC or an allied country). Even though everyone knows everyone listens (or tries to listen) to those sorts of calls (especially when made on open lines, not secure ones as this was), no one likes to admit it.

Without a doubt!

Important: https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1261428128347537408

Important: https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1261428128347537408

When a wise man hears of the Tao, he immediately begins to live it. When an average man hears of the Tao, he believes some of it and doubts the rest. When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud at the very idea. If it were not for that laugh, it would not be the Tao.

This is blatantly false. I voted for Obama. Twice. I never voted for Trump. My cause is justice.

Incorrect. And this is proven by how long it's taken to get the unmasking information out to the public (over two years). Incorrect. It's in court because they're fighting to preserve the rule of law, while what you're arguing is seeking to subvert it. You don't realize you're arguing this, because you're truly too stupid to.