Deranged Rhino

It's not "deep state conspiracy stuff" -- it's actual facts. *It's a FACT that Trump/Russia was never real, that it was a piece of fiction created in the Oval Office and pushed by the CIA, DOJ, FBI, and their media cut-outs for three years despite everyone involved knowing it was not real. * It's a FACT that this was done, not to protect the country from Trump, but to subvert the will of the voters whose choice they disagreed with. * It's a FACT that the SCO knew, before Mueller even took the job, that there was no crime to investigate -- which is why they turned it into a perjury trap. * It's a FACT that the last administration abused the powers of surveillance to illegally spy on AMERICANS: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/world/senate-intelligence-commitee-cia-interrogation-report.html https://www.realclearpolicy.com/2019/05/27/obama_spying_on_press_more_extensive_than_previously_thought_41847.html https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf That's why you're failing so hard right now, you can't see the difference. This is incorrect. I used PRIMARY SOURCES as my evidence. And I cite sources from the entire MSM spectrum. Again, if your position was as solid as you think it was, you wouldn't need to lie or distort to make your point... Try READING the sources included, rather than just looking. You'd be amazed at what you can learn.

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP91-00901R000600400020-9.pdf https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/world/senate-intelligence-commitee-cia-interrogation-report.html Karma's a B word, John.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/russiagate-obama-iran

I'm going by your words. They are working to protect people, whether you realize it or not. Know what a useful idiot is? You're being one for real bad people. Obama and Biden aren't innocent though. We have the receipts. They weaponized the intelligence agencies and the IRS against their political enemies. They spied on American citizens, in violation of the constitution and their fourth amendment rights, they blackmailed and extorted to keep their policies alive. These are facts, not speculations. Again, you're woefully ignorant of the basic facts of this matter -- because you've been lied to. You have a choice right now to make. Either to keep believing the lies from proven liars, or to start thinking for yourself. It's scary to think for yourself and buck the headwinds of the massive media complex, but the facts are on your side if you do. And yet -- you STILL haven't said a word about the CIA, FBI, DOJ, Oval Office, Congress, and Media working together to try to subvert both. Not a word. Why?

Again, you're going with facts over feelz and ignoring the basic principle of our legal system: innocent until proven guilty. The facts are the President was entirely transparent with the Mueller probe. He waived exec privilege when no one else would have, he gave the SCO access to his staff (and Congress) for endless hours over 2+ years. Now we know, for certain, that the entire time he allowed this, Mueller and Congress knew him to be innocent but were trying to railroad him (illegally and seditously) anyway. You expect him to let them keep doing that? And funny I don't hear you, in all your teeth gnashing about protecting our democratic republic and the rule of law, ONCE mention how the FBI, CIA, and former administration lied to the country for three years about a crime they made up. I think you're not really concerned about any of those things. Not really. "I have a pen and a phone". So, you're wrong. And the facts are not on your side. A tyrant seeks to CENTRALIZE power, not de-centralize it. Every action taken by Trump's administration has been in favor of the latter not the former. So, while it may be "apparent" to you that Trump wants to ignore the balance of power, the facts are not on your sides. Again, feelz over facts are doing you in. You say this, while at the same time arguing what Mueller did was legal and above the board. It's either because you're ignorant of the facts or are too dim to understand them. It's one or the other. If you did understand the facts, you'd understand that what happened in 2016-2019 was an attempt by both establishment parties to subvert our free and fair elections. The establishment disagreed with who the people chose to run the country, and then they concocted a backdoor coup to overturn those results -- democracy be damned. People like McCain did that. People like Obama did that. People like Clinton did that. People like Bush did that. So spare me your "I just want a president" nonsense when you're CLEARLY and LOUDLY supporting the opposite because, again, you're either ignorant of the fact that you're being used and have been lied to, or you are aware and just don't care because "Orange Man Bad". It's a bad look on you. This isn't about GOP v DNC, conservative v liberal, or even commie vs capitalist. It's about right and wrong and the rule of law. You're outraged that Trump has flaunted the rule of law (he hasn't) while ignoring the very real and very provable ignoring that was done by the people you're (for some reason) compelled to protect. I'm not calling you a liar. I'm calling you ignorant. Take No Name. He, right now, is rotting in hell (deservedly so) for a lifetime of betraying this country and humanity itself. This is a man who: * Rolled on US soldiers while a POW, getting them killed * "Accidentally" set fire to a US Aircraft carrier * Spent his entire political career seeding chaos around the world and partnering with the enemies of this country to do it (including AQ and actual Nazis) * Spent his entire "philanthropic" career fighting human trafficking while taking money from the world's biggest traffickers and working to keep the loop holes in the law and the border open for them to traffic women and children through his state * Spent the last years of his pathetic, miserable life, committing actual sedition by spreading the Steele dossier to the media, the FBI, and to Congress when he knew it was bogus. That's his actual record and legacy. And you either knew that and didn't care (doubtful), or were ignorant of it. It's an either or proposition.

Lee’s been on this from the start: https://mobile.twitter.com/LeeSmithDC/status/1263325210985615360 worth the time.

Yup. Disliking Trump is intellectually lazy now, it’s not brave. You’re leaving out the whole part where Trump was innocent of the crime they were investigating him for, and the fact that Congress, the media, and even Mueller knew that BEFORE the investigations started. For someone who claims to care about democracy and the rule of law, you are applying it very selectively and without factual support. Feelz over facts.

We’re not “just eliminating the more criminal possibilities” — the actual criminal investigations into him already have. That’s my point. There’s nothing criminal in them or they would have dropped already. Everyone from the FBI to CIA to Mueller’s SCO had access to them, not to mention the IRS. So that leaves only political points left to score. And if you’re Trump, seeing what you’ve seen for the past three years (like how the media painted him as a traitor without evidence), why would you release them? As I said, don’t hate the player for beating the game — or for your own delusions that there’s something big lurking in the returns. It’s just not reality. Of course you did. Wrong. About nearly every single thing you’ve espoused here. But why go by facts when you have feelz? Yet, nearly every action he’s taken has been to DE-CENTRALIZE power. Again, who needs facts when you got your feelz.

Honest question — what do you think the returns will show? We know there’s nothing illegal in them, if there were it would have dropped long ago (either while Trump was a candidate — we know how 44 weaponized the IRS against his opponents previously — or during the three CI investigations launched). So, what’s the end game in your eyes? Can we agree the best hope is something embarrassing which would then be used politically? And if we can, then ask yourself if you’d release them if you were in Trump’s shoes after seeing first hand how dishonest the media is for the past 4 years? Don’t hate the player for beating the game.

Just as you’re too dumb to detect sarcasm, you’re also too dumb to realize the truth right before your eyes. Go back to protesting “individual freedoms in the name of world peace”.

I do hear you, truly. I was you in 2016 (didn't vote Trump, couldn't vote Clinton, voted Obama twice). But once you really see the rot and intentions of the establishment political class (which is bi-partisan rot), the only thing that you know for sure won't break the cycle is to keep electing establishment politicians who got us into this mess. One of the more undeniable trends of the past four years is how former partisan enemies within the political class (think Bush v Obama, Bush v Clinton) immediately became allies in their universal denouncement that Trump was a threat. History proves the Bushes, Clintons, Obamas (and more) were the actual threat. They've been in power for over 30 years -- and in that time have done some horrific things like: launching endless wars for going on two decades while simultaneously gutting the military's ability to fight those wars, throwing away the Bill of Rights in the name of "the war on terror", off shored millions of jobs and our most vital supply chains, and subverted the rule of law to allow them (and their friends) to get away with crimes that would land the average American in jail for decades. That was the first tell for me. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" type logic. But that only got me so far. It wasn't until I really looked under the hood of what happened in 2016, and what was attempted in 2017-2019 that the actual stakes of the game we're playing right now came into focus. This isn't about Trump, or even Biden. It's about whether the people of this country would rather live in an free and democratic republic, or merely the illusion of one. And make no mistake, an actual free and democratic republic can get ugly. But I'd rather have it be ugly and free than the inverse.

Listen to the tape. It's damning -- which is why it's being ignored by every establishment outlet.

This is what I presumed for the longest time. But the more I've spoken with prosecutors about this, the more I keep hearing that in a RICO case it works in the opposite direction. Start at the top (or mid-top), nail the lieutenants with can't miss cases and watch them squirm to rat on the big boss(es). I guess we'll see over the coming weeks/months.

That's not what they're mad about. They're mad about: * Establishment politicians saying nice things to the camera while robbing Americans blind (tradition) * The rule of law being unequally applied * The attempted subversion of the republic and everything it stands for * The elite forcing of globalism on the people while lying about its true purpose -- which was never about making America stronger, only weaker These are real concerns and threats facing our country. People responded to Trump because he was a hand grenade lobbed by the very people who've been ignored and exploited for decades by the political class. It's why he'll win again, black swan or no.

Busy day on my end -- but lots happening. Also: (thread)

You're not even bright enough to understand sarcasm when you read it.

You're leaving out the felony leak of it all in your rush to downplay something you don't even have the introductory level understanding of. Who did the Bush machine and Cheney rush to support when the information about the illegal political surveillance of multiple campaigns by 44 started to break? Where did Cheney and W come down in terms of the Russia narrative? It's actually a continuation of this abuse. Something you'd understand if you bothered to educate yourself on the basics of what happened. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf Start there. And if you read it, you'll see it's from the FISC and it's discussing its findings that 85% of the 702 searches done by the FBI and DOJ were not only illegal, but done by independent contractors working for the administration. Unmasking isn't the story. The leak, and more importantly, the reason for the leak are what matters. But please, continue to mock that which you don't understand. It'll be fun to cite this post in a few months time.

https://mobile.twitter.com/newsmax/status/1263152669608349701