Deranged Rhino

As one of six, I can say this is absurd... though my older siblings might agree.

You're already admitting you're wrong and I was right. Expulsions are different than sanctions. Two different things entirely. The transcript proves this, as does your couching above: Flynn didn't say "don't do anything" about sanctions -- which was the claim. He said to only be reciprocal with Moscow's expulsions. That's above board, entirely legal, and in no way was a lie. You're literally years behind the curve on this story. ****************************************

Update -- I hope it was precautionary. The video didn't look good. (It's being taken down all over now)

Sadly, some here lack even half that brain as they prove daily with their posts. (and in this thread)

Didn't know where to put this... but the video is online and it looks rough for Ron. Prayers.

It was all done "by the book" of course...

If only the world got to see the microfilm that Sean Connery stole in The Rock...

2020 strikes again

Joe has had a terrible weak. He's losing ground in all the swing states that matter. The Senate report laid bare his family's corruption. Then yesterday we see his hand in the illegal spying operation against political opponents. No Chance Joe got his name for a reason. They're just getting started hammering him on these issues. Red October coming up.

One person is going to jail for sure, Clinesmith. We'll see if more are coming, but there's already one scalp.

Comey's name comes up because of his role at HSBC, where he oversaw money laundering on the CF's behalf.

Why it's almost like they're not real journalists, but IC cutouts with bylines.

It's all true. Every bit of it. What happened was the biggest scandal in US history -- and you're parroting reporting about it that's not only old and outdated, but factually incorrect. Case in point: We have seen the transcripts now. We know he didn't inappropriately discuss sanctions, in fact we know he didn't discuss sanctions at all. They discussed expulsions which are entirely different, and even in that conversation he said nothing inappropriate. We also know now, from the FBI itself, that both agents did not not think he lied during the interview. You're pushing false information as if it's facts. That's not your fault. It's your information sources' fault who have been lying to your face about this topic for four years now. Get better sources. Dig deeper. You'll be shocked what you learn.

The Barnett interview is definitely the newest piece. What I've been told by investigators connected is that this whole matter has been one big ball of yarn. The more threads they pull, the more yarn they've found. That's also why I've been told for the last 6 months that it's really going to take another term to do right since they keep finding more and more dirt/guilty parties. Justice is slow when it's unraveling something so massive. This ties into so much other corruption that it's near impossible to disconnect and focus only on one element of it. (and they're trying to do it without pulling the whole damn system down with it)