Deranged Rhino

Being wrong about a fact doesn't suddenly make it an opinion. If morality wasn't an ever changing construct in history you could prove it. But you cannot. While I can prove, very easily, that it is. You're wrong. All the way. You can say this because you were born into a world where slavery was deemed a moral evil. That took hundreds of years to change, and one of the bloodiest wars in our nation's history. Which, of course, only proves my point. But it wouldn't make you evil, or unworthy of your place in history.

CTE is real, kids.

He's said this before. It's a stump speech, he's never taken action on it. I doubt he will.

And you still won't answer. Because you know you'd answer "yes". And that would prove my point. You're not near as smart as you think you are. You're very transparent. There's no anger here. I'm laughing at you. At your cowardice and low IQ.

You're diametrically opposed to a basic fact? It's not an issue of opinion. But that's because somewhere you had a Marxist teacher, or you've fallen under the spell of critical theory in all its toxic forms. Slavery existed since the beginning of time. It existed long before Columbus came here, it existed long after he shuffled off this mortal coil. Expecting a man to completely change -- not just his own perspective, but that of the entire world, based on modern moralities and ideologies is dishonest to its core. It does not illuminate truth of the past, it hides it and buries it under nonsense. Keeping a level would mean not being diametrically opposed to a fact

I'm not searching your history when I'm doing 100 other things at the moment. You can prove it by answering one simple question with a yes or no. Did Trump collude/conspire with Russia to steal the election? Yes or no.... One answer could end it. But you won't. Because you're wrong, and have been wrong all along. Thank you for proving that you're not only wrong, but also a coward.

Morality changes throughout history. That's not a revolutionary statement, it's fact. And if you judge the past using the modern lens, you'll always be misled.

Here's the full interview (took me forever to find it -- still haven't seen it in full) (Durham portion starts around 21:45)

Heaven forbid someone cite a source from the campaign, about the campaign. I know, I should use the NYTs only. Because they've never been wrong. Question: Did Trump collude/conspire with Russia to steal the election. Yes or no? One word answer, please.

This is great... ... But all I was thinking was, "they're still driving?!"

All the way. You know this.

It is obvious. So obvious it took me one sentence to explain it. But you're in denial about what's actually happening. Which is why you're lost.

I'm a historian with multiple degrees on the subject. What I said was different than what you're implying. I said, you cannot look back at the past with a modern lens in order to pass judgment unless your goal is to be dishonest about history itself. It's Critical Theory 101 -- which is Marxist. It's goal is not to give you an understanding of history, but to shade it and distort it into "evil" in order to destroy it. And you're playing right along with it because you're not stopping to think for yourself.

And that's different from the others in his day... how? Right. You can't look back at history using a modern lens to pass judgment -- unless you're a Marxist practicing critical theory in order to destroy the past. Thank you for proving my point.

Nothing. He has nothing to do with systemic racism either. But this isn't about systemic racism. Or race. It's about Marxists using that as cover to shred the country from within.

You weren't watching what happened clearly. They opened one gate -- because the other three were blocked. When the groups saw that, they moved to this gate. Time stamps are a B word. (That first pick was 10:30 am, Brad's pic was 4pm)