D. L. Hot-Flamethrower

Online courage by a few

How many starters injured for Houston in this game. More great coaching by KC -sarcasm

Some things never change its Patriots all over again.

Typical KC. 3rd and 14. Fierce pass rush by opponent forces a strip sack for a TD 17-7 opponents. By no you say. It was actually an incompletion and Lo an behold a ticky tack roughing the passer. First Down Chiefs! Instead its's 14-10 Chiefs within 5 plays. Whoever said you need to knock the champ out wasn't kidding, you ain't gettin' any decision . You need to beat him to the ground, stomp him, fart in his face and strip the dignity from him!

Give it time, this didn't age well

Yeah it's a chippy team, to put in mildly.

Nah I don't see KC blowing out anyone let alone Houston. Demeco with have his defense ready and it'll be competitive.

Most Overrated, Player of Year and MVP all in same season-remarkable!

Not as frightened of Cincy as some are because their defense is just awful. Not that we'll have to worry because they aren't making it.

The 86% playoffs chance I've been seeing for Denver seems very high to me. Ran the remainder of games through Playoff Machine at ESPN and Indy should win final 3 games and Denver could easily lose to Cincy and KC. Seems like a much higher failure rate for Denver is likely. Edit: NYT has it at 79% and that still seems very high. I think Payton knows he's in trouble after losing that game last night.

Is it just me or do the Ravens big completions always seem to have guys running wide open. At least 3 of his 4 TDS looked similar to this in openness. This is why the eyeball test matters and not just boxscore analysis. Giants suck too! The one to Justice Hill had the entire side of the field vacant.

Nah! The best of their time you have to believe given similar conditions would be amongst the best now and vice versa.

Chiefs Fins Jets Cowboys

The only way to do an exercise of this type is to put it into the proper context. You have to consider-Was a guy the best of his time and by how much? Just using stats without context to how the game is different in each era is faulty. I tend to think that the best guys back when would be the best guys now. And vice versa. Jim would be somewhere 4-7 and that's close to what he was in his era too.

Dan Campbell is going to get alot of votes wait and see.