bbb

I thought you were replying to something else, as it was a 2nd quote box.

Typical answer on this thread.

Got it - thanks!

Why don't you give reasons why it's ignorant, why it invalidates his post and why it's utter garbage. Everybody on this thread throws out some statement of a few words, and leaves it at that.

I can add idiotic to the name calling. The thing you first when crazy on was even said by JA to be embarrassing.

Thanks. Do you know if any of this work has been done at Bethlehem? I know it looks way different than it used to.

Do you know how much that cost? It would seem to me that if they did it there, it would be very doable at Bethlehem.

See - it's always three minutes!

Why is it that everybody is going crazy about the environmental aspects of a stadium at the old Bethlehem Steel site, but there's this project moving right into the Republic Steel site?

Yeah, first you called me a tool. Then you said Do your homework. Then "What !@#$ing planet are you from?" Then "Good luck bro. Please don't present your ignorance ass in PPP." Then "that's a fairer point than what ever the hell bbb is trying to say." Then "Obviously I don't make uninformed posts about sports I don't watch or know little about." What exactly would you have to say more in order not to be said to be going ballistic and not being and taking this **** too seriously?

I invite you to read say the ten posts starting here, and then tell me that I'm the one who is sensitive. We were having a civil discussion and then somehow you woke up Sunday and went ballistic: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/168390-football-vs-football/page__st__60#entry3156814

I was listening to espn radio late last night when they were listing some of his stats. 19 straight seasons of hitting over .300. Holy crap - that's unreal in the modern game! 5 seasons in a row where his collective BA was .368 And, it went on and on. And, the biggest thing wasn't his stats. It was what a class act he was. This one hurts.

I don't get it. Do you speak in secret codes? What the hell does this mean - "you're even more upset that I didn't answer the questions that you didn't identify?"

That's my biggest (maybe my only) fear right now.

Yeah, and I'm the tool.

The offsides rule is a killer, as I mentioned before. What you said - yesterday, a friend of mine is telling me how into the this he is. (I've known him for 35 years and I've never heard him mention soccer before) I said soccer is pretty boring, and he said Well, it's interesting with the strategy - like watching a chess match. I said You like watching a chess match?

Another question is why would that Brazil girl do that? Mr. Peace said that it was embarrassing, which was the whole point anyway. But, of course, couldn't leave it at that. He said that I'm wrong about it being a time wasting strategy (which is what espn and pretty much everybody at the time said). Then what was it? Oh, he doesn't have the time to tell me. It's beneath him. The same circle over and over. Don't ask me what questions I asked if you're not going to answer them. So pretentious.

Yeah, I called you that, after you reversed field and started calling me names two days ago. The day before, we were discussing how they could end games better than the current PK system. All of sudden, you call me a tool. WTF Here's a question - how did I confuse myself about the meaning of literal? That is one thing that I'd like answered. DC said that, and never answered. Calling people gay is always funny, though.

You couldn't have that more reversed. Of course, once again, I get called the tool (which all started with you as you've turned into an ahole from what I always thought of you as) because I agree with somebody else. Tools are people who don't answer questions, like you guys.

Yeah, keep up the tradition here of name calling instead of answering questions. A tool is somebody who disagrees with you, right?

I was going to say that I thought I've seen it in non WC games, as well, but didn't want to be called a tool. (I'm a tool for taking one side of the debate in a debate thread - makes sense) I was thinking yesterday that last year I went to my niece's conference tournament championship game. This game was to make it into the NCAA tournament. When goals were scored, the girls jumped up, then high fived each other, then went back to midfield to start playing again. This game meant as much to them as this WC game meant to the crying man, and yet girls act like pros and grown men act like girls. I sure hope I did it.

I have to wonder how many of these spots are like Buffalo. There is ONE bar here that is the soccer bar. So, every time the paper or TV wants a picture of pretentious hipster soccer fans going crazy, they go to that one bar. I'm guessing if they went to a normal sports bar they wouldn't be seeing this type of thing. I could be wrong.

Wasn't there a 0-0 game yesterday? JA just throws pompous **** out there, trying to look superior, and hopes that people don't actually know differently. How did you like refereeing? I have attended many high school and college games (womens) and I have never seen a sport where the parents complain so much. I know it's because pretty much every play looks like it can go either way, but holy crap they need to chill a little. My soccer loving niece, who plays D3, coaches, etc. - the only thing she didn't like was reffing.

Funny how all I've done on this thread is agree with other people, yet I'm the one who keeps getting beat up, as you said. And, since I was so wrong yesterday, maybe you can tell me how - since nobody else did. Yeah, a grown man lying face down on the field and crying in the middle of the game (the first game of the tournament.) That's normal. His teammates were trying to pull him up. I suppose that's some sort of secret thing you can't tell me about, right? Oh, and while the clock just keeps running. Hahaha

He is such an unreal hack.