Jump to content

GunnerBill

Community Member
  • Posts

    56,643
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GunnerBill

  1. I wasn't saying he didn't. I was simply saying the Bills will draft a guy they have met in round 1. It is just how they operate.
  2. I agree. Though I do think they will nibble at Gabe Davis. It isn't just fan talk IMO.
  3. I remember "if Kadarius Toney is drafted by the Chiefs it is game over" not just from Bills fans. I heard it in the mainstream media too. Low and behold he ends up there after a trade and royally sucks balls.
  4. Nah I doubt they change that. They are big on character and culture. They are going to draft guys they meet. Take that to the bank.
  5. In which case he is still in play.
  6. Yep. The Bills don't draft kids they haven't met.
  7. The Legette dream is still alive 🙏🏻
  8. You might have missed it but I did a bit of DM bombing in the past week - touched base with 8 respected folks who I have got to be on DMing terms with over the past 5 years or so including two NFL scouts (one past and one present). Asked them basically where they were beyond the consensus top 3 and this was pre-combine and the split for the "4th guy" was Thomas x3 (including one who had him at WR3 ahead of Odunze) Coleman x2 Mitchell x1 Worthy x1 Franklin x1 And Worthy was the former scout. So I totally buy that the NFL has always been higher than the draft comnunity.
  9. Me personally? I wouldn't. Because I like Legette a lot and while I understand the risks of 1 year production and age I'd be willing to stand pat and take him. I have started on some of the simulators looking at how high I'd be willing to go for Thomas. He is my WR5 with a borderline 1st round grade. But acknowledging that I am higher than the consensus on Legette if I take him off my board for a moment there is now a little gap between Thomas and the gaggle of 2nd round grades. I'd make a phone call to Seattle at #16. I think Jacksonville is the crunch spot for Thomas, Seattle is a team I think would be willing to move back unless one of the 3 stud edge guys is still there (they are likely looking at the interior of both lines in that scenario IMO). I'd offer my 2nd in 2024 and my 2025 2nd too. I wouldn't worry about Worthy with the Jags. Baulke's history is he likes big. Don't think Worthy will be for them. Dallas much more in play.
  10. I still struggle with where the special is on the tape. He is a solud receiver. Does everything well. Not sure what the trait that really separates him is.
  11. 20 is quite good (and it is 20 plus 4 1st/2nd borderlines). I haven't had that many since 2019 which was a pretty good draft when you look back now. So I think it is a good first round. After that it is good in some spots and less so in others. I think OL has decent depth. Safety while it lacks blue chippers at the top is pretty deep. Corner is good early and good late (there is a bit of a lacuna in the middle rounds 3 and 4 sort of area). Then obviously WR is very strong and deep. On the flip side.... horrible tight end class beyond the top two, not a lot of true starting running backs and slim pickings at linebacker. There are three studs at edge, then 1 boom or bust guy, then 3 starting level players and then a LOT of projections and question marks. I only have 10 that I'd take before the end of round 4 currently. On wide receivers in I have 4 and a borderline. But then I have a cluster of them between my 30th best player and my 40th best player. So however it falls I don't expect the Bills to have to reach right down the board to address the position.
  12. I have made my case you have made yours. I have no desire to have one of your long rambling, unweildy "whataboutery" debates on this topic. Got way too much to be doing at the moment.
  13. Ha I was about to say I wouldn't say zero chance Ladd goes before Worthy but you have edited in the meantime. I think it is more likely Worthy goes first of the two because someone will fall for that speed but it isn't zero chance they go the other way around. I actually have a higher tape grade on McConkey and wouldn't shock me if some teams do too but it just takes one GM to look at that speed and say "that is for me."
  14. I am confused with him. I don't think I can touch his grade based on yesterday because I don't think it aligns with the tape. I need to go and do a re-watch of him but for now I'm leaving him where he is on the board. Mid 2nd grade.
  15. Agree. He is better after the catch than Beasley though. Which was always the appeal of Shakir in the draft. He didn't really run routes or play in anything approaching a pro offense at Boise but when you got the ball in his hands he could make things happen. His route running has already come on leaps and bounds from where he was as a rookie but he doesn't have that same instinctual feel for soft spots in coverage that Beasley had. That was what made Beas an NFL player, without it he'd have been a grocery bagger. But his feel and football smarts were elite. You are right about role player. That is where you want Shakir. Not a feature of your offense. A complimentary piece of it.
  16. As I said yesterday even before the Combine I found one well respected guy who had Worthy as WR4. I do not think it is crazy that he is the 4th off the board. Does sort of depend on the team though. Because I am not sure he is Trent Baulke's type. Trent likes BIG. So if Jacksonville are the 4th receiver team it won't be Worthy. If Dallas are... well they like speed he is in play there. There is even part of me that wonders about Miami. I don't think they are in the receiver market generally.... but they love track speed. Would they say "screw the OL we are gonna add Worthy to Hill and Waddle, now try and stop us"? Kansas City I can imagine loving him too.
  17. I like McConkey. I don't like him for the Bills because I think he is a slot at the next level. I think his ceiling is to become basically a #1 receiver from the slot a la Cooper Kupp. But even compared to Kupp he is 3 inches shorter, 20 pounds lighter, his arms are over an inch shorter and his hands are smaller. I am not saying he isn't a guy who can take snaps out wide, of course he can and modern NFL offenses are much more creative anyway and move guys around the formation and you can use him in lots of quick game and let him make plays after the catch. But I don't think he is ever going to be a true outside receiver who can take on press coverage and beat the best corners in the league.
  18. We haven't executed deep throws very well. Josh has to be better at them but having guys better at winning deep can't hurt!
  19. We have to be better at hitting them when we take them.
  20. If I was his agent I'd pull him immediately.
  21. I found one respected guy in my messaging round thisnpast week that had Thomas at #3 ahead of Odunze. Worthy is fast. It is everything else that is the issue.
  22. Hahaha. You might not believe it but @HappyDays is on my list of posters that I always read. I respect all of his views and I believe that he is totally sincere in all of them. I don't always agree but I think he understands football and has considered views whether right or wrong And I totally agree those are red flags. The history of guys who have 1 year of production at that age is not good. I just can't get away from loving his tape. It was love at first evaluation.
  23. I agree with all of this. And the Chiefs DBs get allowed with sexual assault on Diggs in playoff games. I am quite jealous.
×
×
  • Create New...