ChallengeHistory

Nah. If EJ plays the rest of the game we win by a TD. Tuel couldn't move the ball at all.

You can't even get out of bounds correctly. Our playoff chances 21%. Our actual chances, 0%. I'm sick to my stomach.

STOP PUNTING HIM THE BALL!!!!

Those "huge" fines were missing a team photograph and wanting to sit in his families box that HE paid for instead of the inactive players press box. SO much smoke!

Because Schiano and Nix don't like him. There's no smoke. Just a whole bunch of idiots.

The kid threw for over 4,000 yards, 27 TD's and 17 INT's last year. I mean, c'mon.

1) With a young team, winning one - losing one, winning one - losing one, is impossible to build momentum and confidence. 2) Then we have Miami, NO, KC, Jets, Atlanta. If we lose this game, and lose confidence, that could be a 1-4 stretch. If not 0-5. If we win this game, and get some confidence, and beat Cinci, then that stretch could be 3-2 or 2-3.

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/162262-scouting-the-cleveland-browns/

Some say injuries are much more prevalent early in the year because the players aren't used to the physicality yet. Their muscle fibers (especially in groins) aren't used to being stretched quickly anymore and need time to re-adjust.

It's important because if they lose, the season is over (as far as playoffs go). If they win, they have a chance to play Cinci on a 10 day rest and then go into Miami with a chance to take a 5-2 record and firm grasp on 2nd place in the division.

Former Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis said earlier this month that he believed that the blackout in the Superdome during the Ravens’s Super Bowl victory was not an accident. A longtime teammate of Lewis’ feels the same way. During an interview with Lisa Salters for ESPN, Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs said he shared Lewis’ belief that there were people behind the scenes maneuvering to get the lights out as a way to halt the momentum that had carried the Ravens to a 28-6 in the third quarter of the game. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/01/terrell-suggs-thinks-roger-goodell-had-a-hand-in-super-bowl-blackout/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs

It's funny. YOU bashed me for not admitting when I was wrong. Now I do, and you take another shot at me. Interesting.

What is your confusion? Did you read the posts backwards? Yes. It doesn't take very long to read 5 articles detailing his poor angles and him struggling to make tackles. We have the internet now. I didn't have to drive to the library.

Ya wanna know what, youre 100% right. I just did a lot of research on him, and I thought he was doing much better than he is.

I think the posters point was that we should have doubled Amendola. Not just hit him. And we should have.

Now that all of the bashing is done, Whitner is a good player. A lot of Bills fans wanted to run him out of town, but he is a good player and he has played quite well in SF.

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/162262-scouting-the-cleveland-browns/

I remember hearing that McKelvin had a chance to play on Sunday. So I'm hoping he can play tomorrow.

I guess you have a point there. About being gone and it not mattering. But the LOSSES had more to do with the defense than the offense. Stick this years defense with last years offense and we may be 4-0 right now.

I'm not confident about this game at all, but I wouldn't use that Bengals game as indicator. The Bengals are not very good.

I get what you're saying. But the dummies with the nail guns often got a nail shot into their leg because they don't know what they're doing with it. If Gailey wasn't a great offensive mind, we may have won 5 games in the past 3 years combined. That's how bad our defense was. We were in games BECAUSE of Gailey's offense.

Much of your post is talking about items not related to offensive game planning and play creating. Which is what this thread is about. I never said Gailey was a good Head Coach, or Scout, or a person fit to pick a Coaching Staff. What I did say was that he created extremely well drawn up Offensive Plays. And his blocking schemes allowed for huge holes for both Jackson and Spiller to run through. And his screen plays were some of the best drawn up screen plays I have ever seen. He turned a little talent and put together a respectable offense every year. Did he have his downsides? Sure. Did he pass on 3rd and 1 too much? Yes. But EVERY coach in the NFL, including Belichick has their downsides. They have their stubbornness (going for 4th and 1 in their own territory against the Colts for example). The question is, does the good outweigh the bad? And with Gailey, on OFFENSE, the good far outweighed the bad. Many of you seem to have forgotten how abysmal our offense was before Gailey got here. I don't care what anyone says, Gailey is a great offensive mind and many of his plays were real beauties.

Thanks Ry!

We all get that. At least I do. But were fans of the Bills. The team. And Byrd is hurting the team by not playing. So screw him.

LOL