boomerjamhead

Mick - I'm not buying your explanation about your unwavering support for this war. My view is based on my interpretation of your posts spanning a couple of years of reading them. I give you full credit for signing on with those of us who were for this war. You were right there with us and I was dissapointed in you when I felt that your support for this was eroding. Thinking that Kerry had a better plan for this war is comical, but that is your opinion and you voted your convictions. Good Job. I really don't care if you call Cheney a liar or not. You really, really, really want to, so go ahead and do it. As a Cheney supporter you have my permission. So on one hand, you have the folks who said, "No doubt, let's roll Saddam." And on the other you had the folks who said, "No doubt, let's not roll him." Who really did have doubts besides those with some kind of twisted sideshow agenda?

You need to read up on what I was saying before you go off half-cocked.

Nice to see you back on the see saw Mick.

Penis.

I didn't know he was a PPP mod.....

It's people like you MIck that forced the Administration's hand on this. It's people like you who were on board with the war when you felt that we were going in there to take out a black and white threat. When we didn't find the WMD, you your likes abandoned the Administration and war effort claiming you had been lied to and to this day you just wont drop it. How in the hell do expect the Administration to try to explain to you that we are going in there to transform the broader Middle East when everything is either black or white to you folks? How easy would it have been for them to make that case? Better yet, how easy would it have been for them to maintain support from you folks? That's what I thought. As Wolfowitz even admitted, they chose the WMD argument becasue they felt it was a way to get everyone on board for the war and that it was a given that Saddam had them. They were right about the former, ended up getting screwed by Saddam with the later. And going back to your sig line, who else would Saddam have used those weapons on? The French?

Dungy can always pull Billick and tell the league to !@#$ off.

Dr Z. epitomizes biased reporting. I'm emailing him today and asking him why he isn't writng to us from the land of three million sheep.

I didn't even think of that.... damn!

and it reminded me of how good the Iraqi people are. Military.com

Excellent job bro.

I bet this sh-- doesn't happen in Alaska....

Agreed.

Where's Oliver?

That, and thousands of child molestors are now burning in hell.

Tie: Pearl Jam and Beastie Boys. [i know, I know, but you can't count Polly Wog Stew because Horowitz wasn't a beastie yet.]

That is hilarious.

Real Farts. Better yet.

Is this what they plan on doing with all of my world tax dollars?

I love the Jerky Boys. That one was a classic.

King is a scumbag.

PERSONNEL FILE HUMAN RESOURCE EYES ONLY Employee #: 113852577 Name: Jim Title: Junior Marketing Associate Status: Full Time Hire Date: 01/16/1997 Infractions: 05/19/1999 – Level 4 Attendance Violation (Called in "sick", later seen standing in line for first showing of Star Wars: Episode I) 07/22/2000 – Level 2 Dress Code Violation (Innapropriate facial hair) 05/16/2002 - Level 4 Attendance Violation (Called in "sick", later seen standing in line for first showing of Star Wars: Episode II) 12/02/2003 – Level 2 Dress Code Violation (earring) 11/04/2004 – Level 6 Conduct Violation (Innapropriate use of company internet - downloaded Star Wars: Episode III trailer) Time Off Request: 05/19/2005 - reason: "sick" I like the last line.

How much did you pay for them?

Nice link.

KJ said he had a good time out there with you guys.