Jump to content

Andrew Son

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,622
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Andrew Son

  1. I think a factor in all of this is the messaging in the locker room. The "we're a family that loves each other" talking point that they get a lot of mileage out of. If Matt is innocent of these allegations, which many say doesn't matter since the distraction isn't worth a punter, can they really just cast him aside due to public pressure?
  2. Seems like the situation was common knowledge around SDSU and should have been uncovered with pre-draft vetting.
  3. Josh took one snap under center last week. He is going to take the vast majority of his snaps in shotgun. I would like to be able to run more effectively. It would be nice to be able to execute a nice four minute offense. But there is not going to be a drastic philosophical shift.
  4. I mean 2 of your three examples of your reasoning are projected depth players. Not sure their acquisitions are driving offensive strategy. Betting on this team to be run heavy is silly.
  5. The concept is a legal one. Joe Shmoe standing around the water cooler has no power to subject anyone to any criminal consequences. People are discussing these abhorrent claims. Everyone on the planet knows that he will not be subject to any criminal punishment until found guilty in a court of law.
  6. And this has been said no less that 100 times in this thread as if it is some sort of complex concept that everyone doesn't understand. No one here has the power to subject Matt to any criminal punishment. Innocent until proven guilty is for the courts.
  7. Idk, I think the conservative knock on McD has been pretty well put to bed the last couple of years. and the RB drafted is more of a receiving weapon, IMO
  8. Also, you can add that we invested in bringing in one of the leagues best oline coaches.
  9. Hopefully one of these years we'll fix the offense!
  10. Seems to me like they've made substantial investments in the oline with Dawkins, Morse, and Bates- and then going after Saffold. Drafting Spencer Brown and bringing in depth with starting experience. Yes, we will see. I wouldn't bet on one of the most pass happy teams in the league to "take the ball out of Allen's hands."
  11. Yes, now that he's cut Haack is off the depth chart. Prior to that, when these discussions took place, he was listed as the starting punter. This regime usually defers to vets when crafting these early depth charts. Do you believe Kumerow is first off the bench if Steph or Gabe go down?
  12. The depth chart where Haack was the starting punter?
  13. LOL, keep clinging to Jake being WR4!
  14. This is absolutely amazing given the poster and the LAC WR and OL depth!
  15. No one is saying Beane isn't doing a great job. But the "Beane is a wizard" angle is a bit much in this particular case since he traded up in the second to get him.
  16. I have Morris as a winner. He was the starting TE.
  17. I think White has to make the initial 53 before they make a move. Think we'll need to keep one more corner, Probably Cam Lewis. Probably another TE too, either Sweeney or Morris.
  18. More likely to get cultured
  19. I think it will be situational to start. If the matchup requires physical man to man coverage on a guy like, say, Allen Robinson- we'll see more Elam. If we want to play more true zone in a given week it will be more Benford.
  20. It’s time to transition to the young guys we’ve been developing IMO
  21. Hodgins has a pretty nice release for a big guy. Intriguing for sure.
  22. Especially considering Barkley has been in the system and this is all new to Keenum.
  23. Well, if he can't find success with this oline, running game, coaching, and defense- he's truly washed. I have a feeling we'll see better play.
  24. Going into any given season I'd say even the very best teams top out at having around a 20% chance of winning it all. It's tough and injury luck ends up playing a big role. We're in as good a position to get it done as any team in the NFL, and we will be as long as we have 17.
×
×
  • Create New...