Ok, one more try... 
  
I don't think you know how this works.  YOU made the claim that he doesn't tackle.  You did.. got it?  OK, Good.  Then, I made the counter point that he was second in the league in tackles.  Tackles are a statistic.  Being second in the league in tackles might lead one to believe that said player is a good tackler, and that it might be a ridiculous assumption to say that they had a "no tackling clause"  in their contract.  
  
Now, given the details of our conversation above, who would be responsible for providing backup proving that he is a poor tackler?