Ok, one more try...
I don't think you know how this works. YOU made the claim that he doesn't tackle. You did.. got it? OK, Good. Then, I made the counter point that he was second in the league in tackles. Tackles are a statistic. Being second in the league in tackles might lead one to believe that said player is a good tackler, and that it might be a ridiculous assumption to say that they had a "no tackling clause" in their contract.
Now, given the details of our conversation above, who would be responsible for providing backup proving that he is a poor tackler?