BarleyNY

Good? No, no he's not particularly good. Bad? No, not really bad. Middling? Yes. Is he the best option at QB the Jest presently have or have had in a long time? Yes, and it's really not even close. Is he the guy they should want going forward after this season? No, they should be looking for a better QB.

Seems like we got to almost the exact same place with the same line of reasoning.

I sincerely hope not. It's such a waste of a roster spot.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/ryan-fitzpatrick-is-only-as-good-as-brandon-marshall-and-eric-decker-make-him/ Interesting article about Fitz, Marshall and Decker.

https://www.google.com/search?q=trent+richardson+poor+vision&client=safari&hl=en-us&biw=1024&bih=672&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxpJmcnaTOAhVFHh4KHZOrBukQ_AUICigC&dpr=2 Just look at those pictures. The link is to the Google results for "Trent Richardson poor vision".

It was a point based system. Not perfect, but not subjective either. It was just points awarded for poll appearances, no. 1 rankings and championships. Also, GO BUCKEYES!

They were pretty much all like that. Easily the worst vision of any NFL RB I've ever seen.

It would make sense to see negotiations reach a conclusion for Gilmore and Taylor at about the same time. Both agents know that they have more leverage while both players are unsigned. If the Bills were willing to pay a bit more to get one under contract so they'd have the option to tag the other, I'm sure a deal would get done. It's probably a good sign for Whaley and the Bills that it's going down the way it is. I do always wonder about smoke in these cases. It'd be smart to float a lot of this stuff out there whether or not it was true.

2006 definitely had some players in it: Mario, D'Brickashaw Ferguson, AJ Hawk, Vernon Davis, Jay Cutler, Haloti Ngata, Antonio Cromartie, Manny Lawson, Johnathan Joseph, Santonio Holmes, DeAngelo Williams and Nick Mangold all went in just the first round. There were other decent players, too.

Yeah. It's an odd fight to have. I can see why Eli didn't want to play there.

I'm not even sure there's much of a cash flow difference. Aren't teams still required to set aside all guaranteed money? It's an archaic rule from a time when NFL teams still ran into financial issues, but I think it still exists. Edit: Yup. This article discusses it. Injury guarantees are the only ones that aren't included: http://www.ninersnation.com/2014/6/13/5803890/breaking-down-the-cba-salaries-and-rule-governing-funding-for

Damn! S**t's about to go down!

Agreed. And the return he gave on his draft pick only matters to the team that took him, not us. I expect he got a deal similar to the 1 year, $2.4M contract SF signed him to last season (maybe less). A RB like him is needed, especially with Karlos' 4 game suspension looming. It makes sense and looks to be a good signing.

Nope. 3 straight 1k seasons is certainly noteworthy, but he was only here 5 seasons total. A longer career here putting up those kinds of numbers would've probably done it though.

Are you debating my statement that an opinion based on unbiased examination and logical interpretation of facts is generally superior to an opinion based on bias and contortion of facts?

Unrealistic positions aren't equal to realistic ones. Sorry to break that to you. People have a right to their opinions, but an opinion that can be backed up with unbiased facts, analysis and logic is worthy of a lot more respect than one that can't. Watching some Pollyanna cherry picks facts to create some pretend scenario to make themselves feel good is like nails on a chalkboard to me. It's like we're in preschool. If we all wish real hard, then all of our dreams will come true! Sorry, I just can't do that. So, yeah, some opinions are better than others. Realists aren't necessarily negative, they are actually very positive when situations warrant it. That's how you can tell the difference between a realist and someone who's just negative (or a Pollyanna and realist). Facts and logical arguments often change the opinions of realists. Negative people and Pollyannas tend to be pretty impervious to facts and logic though.

I love how Pollyannas ignore reality. Conversations usually go like this: Realist: I see a problem here. Pollyanna: You're so negative! Everything's great! R: Not everything. Just look at the problem. It's pretty big. P: You just want to see failure so you can say you were right! R: No, I'd rather be wrong, but the facts say this is a problem. P: You're so negative! Everything's great! (Bad, predictable thing happens) R: Yep, saw that coming. P: You happy now? You always root for failure. R: No. It sucks, but I'm not surprised. P: You're so negative! Yeah, he's been professional and I've given him props for it. He deserves it.

I don't see myself as negative so much as realistic. I'd feel stupid if I didn't think logically about things. I just don't see the point in thinking everything is rainbows and unicorns. The funniest thing about being called negative is that I've actually had higher expectations of the Bills than what they've achieved. I had them at 10-6 and making the 6th playoff spot last season. They finished 8-8. Thinking back on it I was a little Pollyanna-ish. But I do think your comment was funny. I usually haven't been very enthusiastic, but that is because I haven't seen much reason for enthusiasm. That will change if/when I see reason for it.

That's hilarious. I mean that honestly. A guy has to be able to laugh at himself.

Yup. My level of enthusiasm will depend on the contract, however.

A deal like that would be great for the Bills, but I'm not sure another agent allows one like that again.

When I lived in the Cleveland area: - Family & friends - Blossom*, especially taking food and wine and seeing the orchestra there in the summer (*it's a large outdoor music venue) - West Side Market - Favorite haunts (restaurants, bars, etc.) - Metropark System - Cedar Point - Lake Erie Buffalo: - Friends - Favorite haunts - Skiing - Finger Lakes - Erie and Ontario Lakes - Proximity to Canada incl. Toronto, Niagara-on-the-Lake, etc.

Agreed. Also I understand that some stuff doesn't come out until people leave and the floodgates open, but it'd be nice to know some of this stuff while people are still associated with the team - if that can be done without upsetting sources, etc.

I'm thinking more about him refusing to change his behavior until what was at least the third time he was accused of sexual assault, him denying that he'd ever done such things and even successfully appealing to have his suspension reduced. It was a long time before he changed how he acted and I was thinking about the people he hurt, including the women involved, his teammates and his family. It seems hypocritical to me to see him dress down Bryant for smoking pot when he'd have been banned from the league for his actions if there had been the same rules and scrutiny for such actions as there are today.

Probably. Camp fodder at a position we are deep at was released for a guy who at least has an outside chance to stick because he plays a position we are very shallow at.