Orlando Buffalo

The original post in regards to antibodies I posted stated that we should be looking into what ever number that is needed for protection, but we are not currently. Reading comprehension should be your first course of action. Also your definition of a super spreader event is incorrect both in actual definition and how it is used by media. The real definition is an event or location at which a significant number of people contract the same communicable disease. The media uses it to blame conservatives for Covid.

I don't believe what you are quoting is correct. I went from your article to the Salvation Army site that was linked and it does not say anything about white vs black anywhere. It talks of actual social justice vs the democrat BS, so unless they changed it real quick it is likely someone either making it up or taking something out of context. Lastly I know a few members of the SA and they are really conservative.

I accepted it immediately because it was not egregious and the officials allowed them to play otherwise. I thought those officials on a whole did well.

I understand it will be appealed but hopefully it is fully rejected by whichever court hears it. All trials have some issues but that should not be enough to get retrial.

I can't believe I have to explain to an adult that if you have a large amount of antibodies to a virus that you don't need the vaccine. If you have the antibodies then you don't get ill from the virus. But what kind of loser has to go to one quote from 4 months ago when I have literally 100's since when I admitted a week after that I needed to be more specific with my quote. You have lost every argument since which is why you keep going there. Within 8 posts you three times asked someone to explain to you simple concepts- this being the easiest. You seem to like the idea of being the fool who has stats but no understanding of what they mean.

You keep acting like I was not overall correct and you have not had to keep adjusting your argument. Also I am missing where the data I you linked shows that the test is inaccurate, it compares some tests but it shows the combined data looks good unless there is data not presented there.

Went out yesterday with a friend who is about 40 and in good shape who had blood work done last week and found out he has a high level of antibodies despite not having been vaccinated or knowingly had Covid. I am wondering why we are not doing more blood tests before giving the shots? It would seem with proper tracking we can start to determine with even more accuracy who is the most at risk with this data.

I am curious if we run out Dane Jackson as our starting DB or do we move Taron Johnson out of the Nickel Back position? Also I expect to see more of Siran Neal on the field, just not sure what role.

She is obviously trolling so why react?

Can someone tell me how more need to vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity? I have not heard about it in quite some time.

You say this while we are winning 24-0 without Star, Tre and Josh throwing two picks. You must be a watching a different team.

Why are you currently for children vaccines when we know they have minimal, literally less than .001% chance, of dangerous infections for a healthy child?

Agreed- I have spoken with people who state he is not that important and it drives me nuts. Star is the most important person in our run defense.

I am happy the two are going to jail, hopefully forever, but I did question the third guy and once his video is why this trial happened. I read he never touched Arbery, which makes his involvement different but maybe I missing something big with the video taker?

The holding calls could be a concern but Offside and false starts are not judgement so it sounds like a good crew. Hell as long as they don't move the sticks and try to measure after that fact I am good.

Two things- one I am glad he is paying for negotiating in bad faith, hopefully owners are more honest. Secondly I hope St Louis does not blow the money on stupid crap, which is my predixtion

This case to me is murder when you try to detain someone that you have no legal right to detain. No one can claim self defense when they chase someone, and point a gun at them. I assume the jury will see it that way but I do worry because "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a high standard to reach.

I am assuming you did not follow the case closely- Trayvon was not walking directly from the store to the house he was staying in- he was wondering through people's yards, and Zimmerman at no point tried to detain him he simply followed him through his neighbors yards, until Trayvon attacked him. As for your cop, I agree with you, he was being a douche.

If the "antivaccine" crowd wanted to stop your right and ability from getting it you would have a point about shifting goal posts but since you are the one trying to force people to give up there rights the responsibility falls to you to prove your point well, not simply say " hey you are doing the same thing I am"

I am ok with patience from the media about terrorism or hate crime part except for the fact that if the races were reversed you know this would already be deemed white supremacists. This though is likely an act of terrorism since it was most likely done in reaction to Kyle Rittenhouse. I don't think your overall point is bad but the media is certainly dishonest.

What kind of person was Trayvon? Why was he in Orlando? Unless that is a relevant question than Zimmermans other behavior is not relevant. Both parties that night were stupid and the physical confrontation was started by Trayvon, therefore self defense comes into question.

From what I have heard these guys are guilty of flat out murder, maybe legally manslaughter. The Zimmerman case was completely different, Zimmerman was simply following him but Trayvon initiated the confrontation and made it physical. Zimmerman was not standing his ground but at that point it became self defense.

It is sad that you don't care about all the young black kids being murdered in Democratic cities but you still have the white kids from Sandy Hook ready to go 10 years after it happened.

One thing that Democrats seems to have in common is sympathy for criminals, especially career criminals. This is shown by ensuring the Waukesha murderer being free despite plenty of warning he would do exactly what he did.

Why?