Orlando Buffalo

You are unable to accept that Covid is a minimal risk to those who are in good health and under 50 but especially those under 18. My son had many wrestling practices cancelled due to one of the kids having tested positive for Covid but none of them developed symptoms at all or caused a breakout amongst the team. As far as actual deaths, my son's high school has had at least 2 suicides, 2 deaths in car accidents, and a drug overdose but not one Covid death or long term hospitalization. To equate a 16 year old risk with a 70 year olds risk is improper and leads to unethical decisions.

Gentrification is by any standard improving a neighborhood. Often it forces current residents out, but that is not the definition nor necessary. This article states the way you stop the improvement is to sell to black people, how is this printed without the obvious racism being called out. https://www.yahoo.com/news/letters-editor-south-l-gentrifying-100006234.html

I honestly don't call this a happy ending but it is better than him hurting an innocent person

I do not exaggerate when i say that my students missed more days over past year and a half from side effects of shot than from actual days with symptoms from Covid. Once again to those young people I keep referring the risk is minimal.

From the Onion but seeing as 99.5% of people survive- and higher than that under 50- it is a pretty pathetic parody. It would be the same as saying if I don't get the flu shot I will most likely end up in the hospital

You are always good for a laugh, you present a poorly developed thought and then reply Trump when it is shown how dumb you are.

How about a Republic? Maybe a nation of laws and rights not just swaying to the masses?

So what is objectionable to you about the quote from Michael Burgess then?

You added after the actual quote that you believe an infant has sexual thoughts. That is not part of the quote and is disturbing that someone would sexualize a child that way.

Truly since they are indoors the games should be cancelled, or played with no crowds, if we have to ask someone's health status to do it safely.

Why not simply say you posted the articles without thinking too deeply about it- most of us do it- and upon further reflection the information is garbage.

You actually might be mentally ill and I seriously recommend going to a doctor and seeking help if you read about a baby having pleasure and you think of it on sexual terms. Infants recieve a lot of good feelings from contact with other humans. You also quote a dead mans quote from a decade ago, who has no impact on the current debate unless I get to use Margaret Dangers hope to use eugenics.

While true if you had told me 6 hours before the first accusation became public he was anything but golden I would have been surprised. He seemed to have the world on a string up to that moment.

UB should not want it unless it is on campus, which then means Bills don't want it. From a financial standpoint I get it but all other ways don't make sense.

I think Burrows is a good QB, Lawrence will become a good QB. At this time Burrows and the better talent around him.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.orlandoweekly.com/Blogs/archives/2021/09/29/anti-ron-desantis-ad-compares-floridas-covid-19-response-to-the-purge%3fmedia=AMP%2bHTML I saw this and thought of people like you. I have lived a normal life since early summer 2020 and you think there is something wrong with that. We can't stop people from the Northeast from moving here but you are pretending it is the Purge. Giving people freedom is my default belief yours is to take it away, If freedom prevails I will be on the right side of history.

For those of us healthy people under 50 what is the Covid death rate and what is the flu death rate? It is about the same. Those over 70, or unhealthy, it is much more dangerous. I fully support people protecting themselves, but this idea of a mandate is unethical. Children are not responsible for protecting older people but apparently liberals are all for it.

I don't understand 538 at times- the QB adjusted ELO gives the bills less chance than the traditional but Josh is their highest rated QB on the other tab. How do your chances go down if you are over representing the best player by your standards? Numbers though overall look reasonable

I don't think the complaint is in regards to close calls but the lack of consistency among the officials and what is called. The one call that benefitted Diggs was terrible, nothing happened but later when he would of caught the ball most likely except the defender grabbed him was not called. For example watch AFCCG last year and then super bowl, no standards.

It would appear I am in the minority but I don't fear the Pats* now that have terrible QBs so I want NE to win and give us a blueprint of how to beat them. Brady is not a physically superior QB so let's see what kind of defense messes with him. I bet the Pats go to a defense with everyone floating around besides a few down lineman.

I agree with 90% are the egregious ones but missing egregious ones while calling touchy ones is annoying. The one they gave to Diggs was terrible but then they miss the real one later. But I do generally wish they would not call anything unless it is real bad

I always have opinions and I think our rotation players are still better than their starters. If we sit Josh I think Mitch is still good enough to put up points.

I assume he intentionally misspelled the name to pretend it was different dude. Josh only threw for 350 more yards than he ran for last week. Apparently the DB thinks he should throw for 400 more than running.

The reason I find this funny is that last year I was called a fool for trusting Trump- which I don't trust anyone in government- by an individual who is loudly pro mandate now. If Trump had won I believe they would be loudly anti vax right now

Unless they win this week I don't think Urban wins a game as a pro coach. I bet he jumps ship around Nov 1st for USC.