Orlando Buffalo

Once again I ask what would you consider good proof of fraud? I agree the accusation has been thrown out for the 2000, 2004, and 2016 election without a shred of evidence, but what would convince you?

So you watched the movie 2000 mules and found it lacking in evidence? What could they have presented that would have made you say they had a good point?

So you are gonna argue because beyond reasonable doubt is a high standard? That is a very odd reason to praise Clintons.

Can't argue against it because you know it is true. Why not just sit this one out?

No one realistically thought we were catching the Clintons or DNC operatives is anything provably illegal. It is simply highly embarrassing to have it be shown that despite lying, and having the FBI lie for you, and having the media lie for you about Trump he still won in 2016. Really what satisfaction do you get out of defending them? That Clinton's did not do anything that is beyond a reasonable doubt provable illegal? Sad

Special kind of intelligence to say the guy being paid(Fusion GPS) and the person paying them(Clinton Campaign) did not have same goal. Whether it is a chargeable offense as a conspiracy is much more difficult but regardless of whether there is enough to convict the facts are that Hillary paid for the fake dossier that we at this time know was completely fake. The only people who actually broke laws is likely the FBI agents who used it to spy on Trump, but to prove that is terribly difficult. At this point it is public knowledge that the DNC will pay for disinformation and then use it to get the FBI to break the law, people can use it as they decide.

Baker is somewhere in the 15-25 best QB range. He won't be the worst QB in league but I don't see a version where is top 5. He though is never gonna be a savior so no one is trading is much for him when they know Cleveland can't keep him.

How much do you think he will get per year? His cost is the only reason he is allowed to leave.

If she does not have access then we have a suspect pool of no more than 36 people, 9 justices and up to 27 associates. If the FBI can't figure out who the leaker is then we know that the FBI is basically worthless.

I am disappointed in myself that I actually thought for a moment you might be honest and try to prove something with logic or evidence. As I stated before I got baited back in I am done unless you have any evidence to back up your statement, of which you have shown literally zero, I will simply stand on the fact that she has access to the building, which is fact, and contradicts you.

Your inability to read is fascinating, but go to building regulations and it speaks to people with "legitimate business" to the court who are not justices having access to the court building " subject to approval of the Chief Justice" KBJ has legitimate business and I would state with certainty that John Roberts would approve. So once again why doesn't she have access if she wants? I know I could not get this approval but she has it.

www.supremecourt.gov- I can't believe I actually went and found it but you can be annoying.

Funny how you whine on the other thread about "being called obnoxious and offensive names" and you post this. It is like you push it and whine when others respond in kind, what a whiner.

Be a little more specific but I have a feeling that most pro life people will agree with it. I assure you that the concept that men have to be responsible for their children is not a bad thing in my book.

I will end it here- you admit I have evidence- admittedly older evidence but you have none. So thank you for admitting it and unless you want to present something I am moving on.

Please show me evidence again? Maybe I missed it.

Your article points out it was a grand total of 60 votes that got it done. Obviously I hope he loses but let not forget that Dems have often turned jail stints and arrest into power, Marion Berry, Mayor Curley in Boston, Alcee Hastings in Florida. The only surprising part if he wins is his party.

You have provided no evidence I am wrong, are you really such a loser that unless I have 20 documented ways you are wrong that is a win for you? As I stated show me evidence that things have changed and I will believe it

My claim is she could be the leak, yours is she can't be. I made no definite claim, you did. You are doing the same as the news reporter you are attacking, making claims as definite without any real evidence. I do care who leaked it and will state that whoever did it should be charged with whatever crime it could be.

Actually one big question for a Bulls fan- does he play man or zone at a pro bowl level? Most player have major issues going from one to the other.

So you have done research to show a difference, you have not shown that she has not been in the building. Show me definitely she has not been in the building and I will agree she is not the leak. I am curious why it is so important to you she is not the leak?

Last time, she is confirmed, therefore she has access. Sandra Day O'Connor was working in the building within a few days of being confirmed according to her own words, she did not comment on the intranet. So why would they now make KBJ wait? So she can be behind when she is finally seated?

As I have stated previously i often think you are a staunch conservative who is trying to prove how out of touch liberals are and it is due to this kind of stuff, demanding proof that a supreme court justice is allowed to work in the supreme court building. There is no evidence that she is not working there currently.

Not true, the right has not rioted, so therefore they are going to wait until the FBI can gin something up and then react while being surprised by all the leftwing violence.

She is a confirmed supreme court justice- she has access to the buildings- do you think they bar her from entry until she is gonna sit on the bench? You literally asked me to prove that a supreme court justice has access to the supreme court building.