Orlando Buffalo

Thank you for reminding us of the fact that you are primarily a democrat, not an American.

I am far more confident in our ability to convert a 3rd and 10 than any other teams vs our defense. It is not the absolute lockdown defense of last year but it is also a much harder schedule

This spending Bill reminds me of why I hate 95% of politicans- 100% of Dems and 90% of GOP

Why do you post so much stuff that you don't understand?

What does this mean? I thought Apartheid was something that was based on race, not on your choice to pay for the right to vote in private companies policies, like shareholders.

If I had to pick right now it is clearly Hurts but we have a few weeks left and if he implodes vs Dallas it will make the last few weeks matter. If he smokes Dallas then the race is over.

You stated "the odds of scoring the TD and running out the clock is greater than a field goal" which is wrong. Not allowing the other team to touch the ball makes the worst case an OT game. Your way creates the chance of missed Extra Point or the Dolphins getting a two pt conversion. My way is 1% OT, based on old EP stats, your way is worse odds.

I appreciate your response but I feel I need to state that I am fully aware of what this "investigation" should mean to the DOJ but I read multiple articles that made it sound as if the DOJ had commented on using it as a jumping off point. I have no concern at this point of an actual charge because then the 1400 hours of video would have to be made available to Trump and that would become a field day

The numbers state that a chip shot field goal is a 99% proposition, which is why the extra points was moved back. The numbers state Waddle and Hill are fast enough that if one defender slips they will go to the house. The numbers are by a large margin on the decision made, not your theoretical world.

Congressional hearings for oversight of a governmental agency is the job of Congress, are you actually unaware of that?

Is DOJ really going to file criminal charges based on a congressional hearing? This would be a good satire if not real life. Politicians investigating each other and getting their opposition charged with crimes, nothing more authoritarian is possible

Have you not seen the list of posts they asked to have flagged?

I would be against any ban against a group based on religion, and his "Muslim" amazingly did not include the largest Muslim countries. It would be like complaining about ban on Bills fans because they stopped people from Rochester from coming.

You answered A morality question that is not even in play so you did not have to answer whether the FBI should have been discussing Russian Disinformation when the laptop information was released since they knew it was real. The reason the story was not the biggest story before the election is directly caused by the intelligence community lying about it

Dude when you spend so much time saying what you don't mean people will read between the lines, especially on a topic where the question is ethics not whether it is coercion or just lying.

Reading this thread is hilarious for anyone not seeing it was the right play. The first down did not matter at all, the kick was a 99% play and when the other team has Waddle and Hill you don't give them the ball back if you can help it, especially when the footing is slick and straight line speed can be deadly.

What are you saying ChiGoose? You spend a ton of time telling us what you don't mean, likely because being clear and concise is impossible

Truly either they are so incompetent that they have no idea what disinformation is and they allow their political identity to cloud their judgement or they are complete political hacks who lied to help a presidential candidate.

are you actually arguing the FBI did not know in 2020 that the Hunter Biden laptop was legit? That the FBI is so incompetent that they went through it and literally thought it was russian disinformation? You seem to fixate on the author putting his name on the article, if I am breaking the news that a man who has a great chance to be president is extraordinarily corrupt I am not rushing to put my name to it.

I think it is #32 takes such a bad angle because he does not realize how fast Josh is. I watch Josh and I am amazed how he makes great athletes look pedestrian.

Obviously we will see since it is two years away but Biden won with dementia and all those racist comments, so never say never

A few simple questions that I am hoping you will answer directly and not like a lawyer who wants to avoid the issue at hand- was the FBI correct to state that Hunters laptop was Russian Disinformation? And should it be "flagging" social media posts that they disagree with?

I am so glad the vast majority are against the snow balls- it is embarrassing

And once again your pedantic argument about whether it is coercion vs whether it ethical and moral is telling.

I find it odd that you would argue about the definition of word rather than rather or not it is an appropriate action, but since you can't defend the action you have to be pedantic.