Orlando Buffalo

He did not intentionally kill him, he restrained a man who was threatening those around him and he happened to die. He was a threat to people around him which is the big difference between him and Floyd, Floyd did not threaten anyone.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theweek.com/public-health/1023502/north-carolina-state-concludes-tragic-school-year-that-saw-14-student-deaths%3famp This article states 4 students died of natural causes at NCST this year. People under 25 don't die of natural causes in bunches, what the hell is killing them?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article275351401.html I don't even understand the point of the title, since it is factually inaccurate and it is not anymore exciting then the real thing. It is almost like they simply want to have the most vaguely related title possible just as a standard.

This case is not interesting because we have many reports of Neely threatening to hurt other people. He was acting erratically and there were no police to handle it. Two other men helped him contain Neely which shows he was true threat. Lastly your blaming conservatives for the lack of support for someone in NYC? There is no law stopping NY from helping him, just indifference

Wrong words, I meant reductio ad absurdum, that is embarrassing. Anyways the reason we make laws is that they make our lives better. The reason I am against most new gun laws is two fold- the current ones are poorly enforced and since 99.9% of people don't worry me I would prefer the government focus on dealing with those people that can cause issues. Forcing good people to work harder to benefit government is not a good idea to me.

You have to come back with something that stupid to make it seem like you are reasonable? Does the whole video seem indiscriminate to you?

@redtail hawk and @Andy1 why do you think someone has the right to threaten people in a public place with physical harm? And if you don't believe that what should the Marine have done in that situation?

Ad hominem attacks are the last vestige of a lost cause. His point, that is obvious to anyone with about room temperature IQ, is that the people who are willing to kill others will never be dissuaded by a paperwork law. Pointing out that major crimes will never be stopped by minor inconvenience.

Truly how dare I want to know what books the school is giving my child to read!! Since all the books that are "banned" are still available at the library the only think I can take from your stance at this point is you want to make sure that liberals have full access to kids.

Thank you for admitting that simple logic is too difficult for you to understand. It is a simple question but you can't answer it.

I am wondering at what dollar amount does it make sense to move money from a 401k to a ln active money manager? My 401k has very low fees but the returns are always with 2% of the overall market. Is the right time at $100k $250k or is it more like a $1million

Some of this has to do with your age and how confident you are in high growth. The next decade is likely to be high inflation, so how much you grow is important. Losing 40% though is a lot and unlikely to be gained back unless you hit a home run each of the next set of years

So do you believe that Maddow would run the tax return without knowing if it was true, or do you believe that reporter was lying about the origin of the return? One or the other is true or is there a third option that I missing?

So you know who leaked it and they were not charged or investigated? FBI did a bang up job.

Your defense is that the journalist received the papers "innocently" which we know is false because a competent journalist would never run with something of that nature that is not confirmed. Once again a liberal says a clear lie about breaking the law but you agree to ignore it.

That leaks of Dems are investigated and the leaks that hurt Trump are not, what did you think you were responding to? Printing false derogatory information can cause you pay out money, that is simple. What information don't I know?

So he just believes the tax return is real without any proof of authentication, and Maddow designs a whole show without any verification? The defamation lawsuit would be a slam dunk if it was not true.

No I don't care- when have I ever mentioned it? But I do know there was an investigation, thanks for proving my point.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/media/shortcuts/2017/mar/15/rachel-maddow-and-the-trump-tax-bombshell-that-wasnt The journalist claims that someone dropped the papers in his mailbox and the white house release was only due to the White House knowing what was being leaked. CNN pretending that the journalist had any right to the info is disingenuous but you are so used to be mislead it seems normal.

Who was prosecuted for that clearly illegal dissemination of information? I also know that you did not intentionally imply it, but it is a valid conclusion from your point since no one cared that a law was broken against Trump

Dalton Kincaid has the ability to a special player, like Josh and Diggs. Some people can see the potential others can't see it until after it happens.

It is a great show for anyone who lived through the 90s. Teens today generally just think it is an average show. Many don't want to take the time understand jokes that are very 90s, which many episodes have.

You were a Josh Rosen kinda guy huh?

Your point that liberals will break laws with impunity in NYC is noted.

Miami is clearly the second best team but in our division but they are only equal to us without considering QB and Josh is much better than Tua, so if Josh is healthy this is our division again.