Jump to content

Orlando Buffalo

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Orlando Buffalo

  1. 28 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


    What do you think this means?


     

    “We are going to channel all of the anger that we have over the organized campaign that led to this assassination to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks," Miller said as he joined Vance on a livestream as the vice president hosted "The Charlie Kirk Show" to pay tribute to the late conservative activist.”

     

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/15/trump-plans-crackdown-on-left-wing-groups-after-charlie-kirk-shooting/86166121007/

     

    I am not sure what you are arguing. Do you believe that Terrorist groups should be allowed to flourish in our country? Do you think all liberals are terrorists? Or are you assuming Trump will use the FBI like Biden was when he investigated the PTA mom's for being against gender ideology? 

    • Like (+1) 2
  2. 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

     

    33 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    Didn't even look at it. Don't need to look at the to know you are idiots. 

    So both of your points is that you believe the statement was presented fairly. I can't prove to you otherwise because you literally won't even look at it, preferring to attack me.

  3. 1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


    I think the prevailing notion among liberals like me is “I’m horrified he was shot. I disagreed with him on every issue.” 
     

    And possibly, but that’s by default. Assassinations don’t really happen anymore here.

    so the person on my timeline who said "Having a fourth martini in honor of Charlie" is certainly a horrible person and should be ashamed of himself? 

  4. 4 hours ago, Roundybout said:


     

    There is no reason whatsoever to lower flags for Kirk. I’m sorry, that’s reserved for military and elected officials. 
     

    He was a podcaster who made “epic liberal owned” YouTube compilations and was beginning to dabble in white supremacy, something you still refuse to acknowledge. 
     

    He was a meme more than five years ago because of his stupid “argument” style. 
     

    He is a footnote in history. No one talks about Rush Limbaugh anymore and he was 10 times more influential than Kirk was. 
     

    I’m deeply sorry for his family that he was killed. But the response to this has been absolutely insane. 

    If what you are saying is true then he would not have been assassinated. The only bigger assassinations in the US in the past 75 years are RFK and MLK, and you know it is true because of how happy so many liberals are that he is dead. If he was not important then no one would be cheering his death. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 18 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Why must you bald faced lie to push your position?  you might want to reassess that or at least stop overtly lying.  From your link:

     

    Jones was talking on "Fox & Friends" on Wednesday about public money spent on trying to help homeless people and suggested that those who didn't accept services offered to them should be jailed.

    "Or involuntary lethal injection, or something," Kilmeade said. "Just kill 'em."

    You can keep going this way, but it is a misrepresentation of the topic. The discussion was about a murderer who had been released 15 times, making comments like this without context is irresponsible when we know that liberals are attacking and murdering people who disagree with them. 

  6. 6 minutes ago, Taro T said:

     

    Wadr, not missing your point at all.  You are saying one "humanely" rendered act of insanity is better than another act of insanity (or evilness or stupidity or whatever it was that describes that judge's decision to release him essentially on his own recognizance).  

     

    Will not agree that it is better, again wadr.  IMHO it's like being asked to choose whether it's better to die in a fiery autocrash or merely a severely violent autocrash.  At the end of the consideration, neither is a good option.

    You are missing the point, maybe intentionally, one idea was thrown out flippantly on TV  and few people agreed with it, the other is the policy we are currently running with in liberal cities right now. 

  7. 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    So you didn’t bother to search for his he said exactly quote. 
    from USA today

    When a co-host said mentally ill and homeless people should be more aggressively detained and forcibly treated, Kilmeade added: "Or involuntary injection or something. Just kill 'em."

     You’re the liar. And you just expect to get away with it.  Ah, no.

     

    You truly are a willing moron but CBS states that he was discussing the Charlotte man when he said this, so the right wing extremist at CBS are on my side. 

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/fox-news-brian-kilmeade-apologizes-mentally-ill-homeless-people-executed/

     

     

  8. 1 minute ago, Taro T said:

     

    Are you asking that PRIOR to him having taken innocent life?  Because if you are, you are heading to a REALLY dark place.  And that man that murdered the Ukrainian girl AFAIK had never murdered anyone prior to taking her innocent life.

     

    And, for clarity, WHY do those have to be the only 2 options?  There are a LOT of stops on the continuum between release violent felons with little or nothing more than a slap on the wrist and executing lovingly those that are violent or those we deem inconvenient.

     

    I agree with the middle option for these mentally ill people, which is jail. And they remain in jail until they are well enough to face trial. But you do miss on of my points, what to Dems are doing is literal insanity, what a single talking head suggested is more reasonable then what Dems are currently doing

  9. 5 minutes ago, Taro T said:

     

    The appropriate thing to have done would've been to not release him into the general public for a 14th time.  That horse is sadly out of the barn.

    As far as insane ideas which is more insane: releasing a violent felon back into society to murder again or kill him humanely? Once again he is not a one time criminal but 15 time criminal with many violent crimes. 

  10. 22 minutes ago, Taro T said:

     

    Even IF what he said was strictly directed at the violent homeless and mentally ill people, such as the man that slaughtered the Ukrainian refugee woman; that still is a horrible thought.  To advocate for involuntary lethal injections for the mentally ill displays a level of compassion that is right there with those that are celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk.

     

    If someone is mentally ill, they by definition aren't fully in control of their actions, and therefore should not be made to forfeit the rest of their natural life for whatever it is that person is accused of.  The person on the left in that discussion suggested that these people need to be institutionalized if they are a danger to those around them (not the exact words, but the sentiment) AND they refuse treatments / medicines that can keep the true mental illness under check.  That is a reasonable position to take.  How to actually implement something like that would require far more discussion and nuance before implementing it; but it can be considered particularly if we're looking at stuff like schizophrenia to be the mental illness and not conservativism or liberalism to be the mental illness.

     

    Kilmeade apologized for the comments he made.  Hopefully they were a misspeaking in the moment that went horribly awry; but even if they were, he should consider himself very fortunate if he still has a job in front of the camera.

    One I did not agree with his statement, in fact I stated that multiple times through this thread. The OP lied about the statement and I called him out for it. Secondly what is the appropriate response to this guy in Charlotte and others like him? Is releasing him because of his mental illness a reasonable response? 

  11. 7 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    "Could you give the whole quote, because I can't find anyone who claims what you are claiming. It is almost as if you are simply lying. But I am sure as a liberal facts are important to you."

     

    shameless...

    "Brian Kilmeade said that homeless people should get involuntary lethal injections. They should be killed" 

     

    This is what the OP initially said, which is not what Kilmeade said, he said certain violent criminal homeless people should be given the death sentence. The fact that you guys lie about what is said after your lies cost Charlie Kirk his life tells me you don't learn, or more likely you are ok if your lies cause deaths.

  12. 1 minute ago, Niagara Bill said:

    Charlie Kirk is dead because politics has become a gang war. Assassinations have occurred in history...by nuts, by the mob, but today the waring factions are like gangland. Minnesota now Utah, tomorrow?

    When trump takes Maga down the path of retribution against political opponents, against political organizations that oppose him...and he will, Ceasar has taken control of the capital. After the Reichstag was burned, political opponents were blpamed and targeted. I am not comparing trump to you know who, just the series of historic political actions. 

    The US will have passed the point of no return. 

    The only possible way to save the true democracy is for a centrist party to quickly emerge.

     I know you aren't trolling because that would be beneath you, but you literally compare Trump to Hitler and then state you aren't doing it. Trump was the one targeted for the past 10 years, or perhaps you believe in Russian Collusion, his trials were not political retribution, and the media lying about him is all good honest mistakes?  the US is fine and will remain fine, truly you need to worry about your own country. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  13. 7 hours ago, Cugalabanza said:

    Fox’s Brian Kilmeade said that homeless people should get involuntary lethal injections. They should be killed.

     

    I’m surprised this can fly on a major network show. There has been no retraction or apology or response at all from Fox. 
     

    Do conservatives feel that this is a defensible position?
     

     

    We saw the results just this week the results of this exact kind of lying. Charlie Kirk is dead because dishonest stupid people intentionally lied about him. Shame on you for being such a pathetic troll. 

  14. 6 hours ago, Cugalabanza said:

    Seriously?

     

    On Fox and Friends, the topic turned to homeless people…

     

    Lawrence Jones:  “You can’t give ’em a choice. Either you take the resources that we’re going to give you, or you decide that you gotta be locked up in jail. That’s the way it has to be now.”

     

    Kilmeade:  “Or uh, involuntary lethal injection. Or something. Just kill ’em.”

     

    You can easily find the video clip online.

    The conversation was about the violent homeless who are terrorizing neighborhoods. I disagree with Kilmeade anyways but your intentionally lying about what he was referencing is just trolling 

    • Like (+1) 2
  15. 29 minutes ago, Cugalabanza said:

    Fox’s Brian Kilmeade said that homeless people should get involuntary lethal injections. They should be killed.

     

    I’m surprised this can fly on a major network show. There has been no retraction or apology or response at all from Fox. 
     

    Do conservatives feel that this is a defensible position?
     

     

    Could you give the whole quote, because I can't find anyone who claims what you are claiming. It is almost as if you are simply lying. But I am sure as a liberal facts are important to you.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...