Orlando Buffalo
-
Posts
8,807 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Orlando Buffalo
-
-
The complaint is simply that the only reason Hong that matters is money. Being a great football team is a distant second to making the tournament, and they can't even come up with a unified theory after the fact of what makes you belong where you are ranked
29 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:I just don’t see any way Tulane or JMU are going to win the title so why take up bracket spots. Sue me for being “unfair to conference champs” but who can disagree with that premise.
There was no way Tennessee or SMU were winning it last year but were ranked that highly. Is the argument who can win it or who had the best season because I am sure Bama is not winning this year
-
6 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
splain...if there are 50 spots for 100 male applicants, and 50 spots for 200 female applicants, who has better odds under DEI.? without DEI, there are 100 spots for 300 applicants , regardless of gender (numbers are for illustrative purposes, not precision). male odds decrease, female odds increase with elimination of DEI.
You are trying to tell me you were a doctor who had to diagnose things and this is the only explanation you have? Possible explanation that are more likely, the two largest majors are computer science and Math and Stats, which are both male dominant majors. Brown also likely promotes itself more to females making it more likely to get female applicants. Now if they show stats that indicate the males are getting in with lower SAT and ACT scores then I will agree but nothing has indicated that and the headline shows no understanding of what it is presenting.
-
12 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
No because they'd still have the advantage in common games if we both finished 13-4 and they'd win the tiebreaker. If we beat them next week we'd need to run the table and they'd have to lose two of their last three games (Ravens, Fish, Jets) to win the division. I think. LOL.
According to ESPN playoff machine we win based on conference games if they lose to us and then another AFCE team.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
It's plausible if we beat them we could win out and take the division. If the Ravens wake up and the Dolphins who've looked good recently pull off the upset. Pats will be heavily favored in both games though. I'm not sure who holds the tiebreaker if they both finish 13-4 who hold the tiebreaker.
If the Pats lose to either the Jets or Phins and we win out we won the division
-
1 hour ago, Ralonzo said:
What really contrasted with it was watching Lamar 15 minutes later in a very similar position to Allen not getting it done. Not crapping on Lamar necessarily, but I just don't really recally many athletes in any sport reaching this level of "We're just not going to lose even if I'm the only one pulling the rope" that Allen is on right now.
Lamar is clearly injured and is not playing well. As you said it is not crapping on him to realize that since 2020 Josh has been the better QB.
-
This is hilariously stupid and ignorant. They make a statement of fact but come out a conclusion that anyone who understands statistics in a minimal sense would not come. There are several more likely explanations then the men had an "easier" time getting in.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, DuckyBoys said:
wont say he's a bust because so far he's shown to be exactly what the scouting report said Moulds was a physical freak who finally lived up to his ceiling I'm not sure Keon's ceiling is very high to begin with
I was coming here to say this, Moulds was one of the best athletes in the NFL, whereas Coleman is not faster than most of them. His ceiling is Anquan Boldin, but Boldin was an elite route runner, which Coleman has not shown at all. I hope he becomes Boldin but have little faith
-
8 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
nah, it's being pro humans.
Stabbing racists is not pro human, but that is something that an actual Nazi would say about their political party.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Roundybout said:
Trump will almost certainly pardon him
3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:Cling to your conspiracy fantasies, salesman!
Perhaps you should look to see why you are so easily misled. You truly believed something that had no evidence at the begining but now you are calling the wrong people the conspiracy theorists.
-
I can state that vaccinating my children with all the childhood diseases was am easy,l decision, getting Polio or some of the others ruins a life. Telling my children's pediatrician that he was not going to give them a COVID shot was also easy. I still think people should have the option because COVID showed that government doctors are not always correct and people should be able to weigh the cost/benefit. Besides if we stopped letting illegals into the country there would no source for the illnesses.
-
53 minutes ago, Roundybout said:
Trump will almost certainly pardon him
32 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:He may have already done so, wittingly or unwittingly
Cling to your conspiracy fantasies, salesman!
The conspiracy theory at this point is that Trump will pardon him. There is no evidence he did the bombs to "support" Trump.
-
1
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
President Trump pardoned the narco kingpin. That's defending narco people, right?
The fact that everything that happens is always about Trump with you is hilarious. This thread is about the boats and Hegseth not Trump. The fact that Trump might have pardoned a kingpin is not what I am arguing because I have not researched it yet, but your opinion is meaningless because you are not in any way reasonable
-
1
-
1
-
-
I will point out that I live among a large number of legal immigrants, many of who are going through the process of citizenship, and I don't have these issues in my area, basically ever. It is almost as if people who come here illegally are willing to break more laws once they get here
-
1
-
-
The amount of effort to defend the narco terrorists by some people here is astounding to me. The fact that not one of you had any issues when Obama was killing terrorists over in the Middle East while having collateral damage but this is where you draw the line tells me that your TDS is out of control.
-
2
-
-
21 hours ago, Johnnycage46 said:
100% agree. I think at this point, the Wild Card is our only realistic shot of getting in to the playoffs (division is very, very unlikely with NE current record and schedule and Buffalo's division record).
KC still has other games on their schedule they could lose to ultimately miss the playoffs (Denver again, but in KC; Chargers).
I only disagree on the chance of winning division. If we take care of business then the only help we need is MIA or Jets to pull an upset and we are AFC East champs. Obviously we have to take care of our end first but the division is not dead.
-
I am not going to argue what Trumps mental acuity at this point because he has certainly tapered off his events. I am curious thought if Trump starts the new year and is back to his full plate schedule will the liberals come back and admit they were fooled again by the media?
-
I don't know if he will make it to 40 but it is amazing that this year, when he is having a down year, he is 2nd in total TDs at this point.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I think Manning said it properly "that is sketchy"
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Most everyone cares about innocent people getting hurt. That's a straw man and ridiculous on its face. And there's a questionable premise. Are drug abusers innocent for the consequences of their actions? I think they're at least partially culpable.
Can you show me where you have shown concern on a similar level for the innocent? As for the drug users, they should be helped, just like the mentally ill should be helped, until they start acting violently, then we jail them until they can behave.
-
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:
I flat-out quoted a section from the law explaining why it’s illegal.The Geneva convention does not apply to drug runners, but I have a very serious question for you, why do you fight to ensure every evil criminal has full protections from their actions but the innocent people they kill you don't care about?
-
2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
you're supposed to be a teacher, that sentence structure is fine conjugating verbs is taught in grade school.. You repeatedly error on is/are/ was/were.
Once again you are attacking my grammar while using improper grammar. Perhaps you should consider trying to argue the points made instead of proving that you are unable to live up to the standards you expect from others.
-
1
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
get one of your more literate teacher colleagues to teach you how to conjugate verbs. it's embarrassing.
When you start attacking my grammar it is the truest indicator that you have nothing. BTW your sentence is not properly structured either, it is amazing how often you attack my poor grammar with more poor grammar.
-
51 minutes ago, pennstate10 said:
Seems like you and your droogs don’t understand the concept of innocent until proven guilty.
You must think every president in history are terrible people, we have never given people like that a jury trial, to argue otherwise makes you pathetically ignorant. You should get together with @Roundybout and tell me about the Geneva convention and how it applies here.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Gunsgoodtime said:
When's the last time a team won 3-0?
I will take a 3-0 win today for sure
-
1
-
Liberal White Women
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
If you click on the post she argued with everyone that since those exact word were not on the ballot she is correct. It would be like me arguing that my vote for Trump did not mean "deport illegals" was on the ballot.