Trump_is_Mentally_fit

If he gets the Dem nomination, welcome to President JD Vance in 2029

🤷‍♂️ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/06/18/juneteenth-reparations-bills-slavery/84263142007/ Name the bill "the Republican Victory in Elections Act" I get it, but no way should the Democrats get anywhere near this. Sure, the history has been unfair, but time to move on

Oh, just wait. Tariffs and a worker shortage will work their way through the system. Keep going after those agricultural workers. Just like the socialist, you will learn, nothing comes for free.

Secret service set it all up. Trump the show man directed the action

Capitalism is theft! Everything is just so easy with other people's money. The people that voted for this guy just think its unfair that other people have money and they don't. This is real bad news for NYC, a place I really love. Hopefully the state has some say. There won't be any new apartments built if there are no profits to be made by the evil landlords. The public transit will be ruined if they charge nothing. This clown is going to have to face reality real fast. The market would of hit THAT record high much earlier had it not been for the stupid trade war. We are just making up lost ground here

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/06/26/trump-presidency-news/ Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declined Thursday to echo President Donald Trump’s assessment that the United States “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear sites with recent airstrikes. “We don’t do BDA,” Caine said during a Pentagon news conference, using the abbreviation for battle damage assessment. “I’ll refer that to the intelligence community.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth interjected moments later and said he — not Caine — is responsible for public messaging around the attack. “I can use the word ‘obliterated,’” Hegseth said, adding that he is extremely intoxicated, so take that for what you will. 🤣 Caine later denied feeling any political pressure on how to characterize the impact of the strikes. “No, I have not, and no, I would not,” Caine said. ---- But we have satellites, blah blah Point still stands, Obama had a deal to push it back 15 years. This only pushes it back a few at most

Thanks, I might have to. This John Deere is also smaller than I need, it turns out So you know the initial intel report was wrong? How can you possible know that? Adhomin attacks are a sign of weakness No, it was working. Talk about political bias and myopia! 15 years vs. (maybe) a few years. Trump can't stand up to tough guy Bibi, Obama did.

It was a failure to pull out of Obama's deal, that's pretty obvious. As to the military strike, no, its just the truth, we don't know. You are hoping its a success to the point you believe it is. But you don't know I'm just being rational. Ya, the guy with the upside down flag is the rational one, lol. Chew on that! I gotta go, putting a belt on my John Deere tractor mower, wish me luck, ugh

You are the one with the bias. Even Trump and Hegseth are doubting--until they aren't--the damage done. You don't know, I don't know, Washington doesn't know exactly what damage was done or not. Satellites can't see underground Even with all that, Obama pushed the timeline out 15 years, this bombing, at best, only a few years. Trump should have stayed in the deal.

Obama's deal had no nuke for Iran for 15 years. This bombing, if successful, only pushes it back a few years. Should have stayed with Obama's excellent deal

@JDHillFan What are you rolling your eyes at? Military missions are gambles, maybe they work, maybe they don't. In 1999 Yugoslav forces tricked NATO into bombing fake targets. Deception is a major part of war

If the intelligence was correct. If the intelligence was timely. If they were not fooled by misinformation. You can't see underground. It's lke dropping depth charges on a submarine without sonar. The main compound could of literally been miles away underground, and unlike with a submarine, no debris will float to the surface. If the US had real actionable intelligence about exactly where the bombs should go, they probably smashed up the place real good. But if this was guess work, who knows.

But did they know what they were hitting? First casualty of war, is the truth. Deception happens. Early assessment is this set them back a few months. If that's the case, this was a case of a half measure.

And even Israel is admitting Iran can get a bomb, its just the time line being debated, but this is far from over. They will probably have to launch a commando raid at some point

Lame one? That they can drill, baby, drill underground for miles? You know any military history? Bombing doesn't always work. It's a pretty blunt instrument. It will be interesting to see how Israel deals with this ceasefire while the Iranians clean up, retool and build

He's such an adorable man-child!

Coal mines, for instance, can go on for miles underground, so "precision" might not matter. They have had decades to dig out space in that mountain Bibi will be demanding further action soon That was good to see. Especially in light of China's sudden rise in military power, technology and possible ambitions

Sure, now we should just leave them alone. Wonder what Bibi thinks about that? You know he isn't happy and wants Trump to attack again

Well, it is underground, the bombs might have hit the wrong spot. Or it was way more spread out underground than intelligence could determine. Maybe it did extensive damage but the Iranians hide that fact and act like everything is fine Israel demands Trump attack again

Do you think another round of bombing will be necessary?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/06/24/us-iran-bomb-assessment-nuclear-sites-not-destroyed/ An initial U.S. intelligence report assesses that airstrikes ordered by President Donald Trump against Iran’s nuclear facilities set Tehran’s program back by months but did not eliminate it, contradicting claims by Trump and his top aides about the mission’s success, according to three people familiar with the report. The classified report by the Defense Intelligence Agency is based on the Pentagon’s early bomb damage assessment of the strikes on nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan using earth-penetrating munitions carried by B-2 bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles. It assesses that the strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran’s nuclear program and probably set it back by several months, not years, one of the people said. U.S. intelligence reports also indicate that Iran moved multiple batches of its highly enriched uranium out of the nuclear sites before the strikes occurred and that the uranium stockpiles were unaffected, said the person, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. A second person familiar with the initial DIA report — labeled “low confidence” in nature — said it concludes that some of Iran’s centrifuges, used to enrich uranium that could be used in a nuclear weapon, remain intact. ---- The Trump administration scheduled and then postponed Iran briefings for House members on Tuesday. Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Illinois), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, told The Washington Post there is widespread belief in Congress that the embarrassing content of the assessment is the reason the Trump administration decided to delay the classified briefing. “They don’t delay briefings that have good news,” Quigley said.

oh stfu you tool

You forgot that Trump pulled us out of the Iranian nuclear deal to begin with. There were inspectors in place during the treaty

https://www.newsweek.com/china-state-media-israel-iran-airstrikes-defenses-arms-sales-2086463 The collapse of Iran's air defenses in the face of Israeli attacks has prompted influential Chinese commentators to say it could have fared better if it had been supplied with Chinese weaponry. Chinese fighter aircraft proved themselves in combat for Pakistan during its recent confrontation with India, with Pakistani forces claiming to have shot down Indian jets. "Iran's biggest mistake was not purchasing weapons from China," wrote "Former HR himself," a Weibo account with two million followers. The Chinese comments on the failure of Iran's air defenses, which were largely dependent on Russian systems, highlight the increasing prominence of the latest Chinese weapons technology and China's desire to secure new markets for it. The apparent success of Chinese air power in the confrontation between India and Pakistan had already elevated its profile, with stocks in Chinese defense company AVIC Shenyang soaring by 10 percent on last week's news that Pakistan planned to acquire 40 of its J-35 fighters. Countries unable to acquire advanced fighter jets from the U.S. are increasingly turning to China as an alternative supplier, as Beijing positions itself as a viable competitor by ramping up exports and strategic partnerships, as well as showcasing its aircraft in military drills. China Central Television program Defense Review said that netizens from several Muslim-majority countries had called on their governments to introduce the Chinese J-35 fighter jet immediately after seeing what had happened in Iran. These calls—from nationals of Pakistan, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Algeria, and others—illustrated a growing desire to strengthen security partnerships with China as a way to counter U.S.-built hardware, such as the F-35s flown by Israel, the report said. This narrative was also taken up by Hu Xijin, the outspoken former editor of the state-run nationalist tabloid Global Times, who has nearly 25 million followers on the Chinese microblogging platform Weibo. "If Iran had several dozen J-10s, plus a Hongqi series missile air defense system, and with Pakistan's level of air defense, it would probably not be as easily struck by Israel like this," Hu wrote in the now-deleted post. The J-10 is an older generation fighter than the J-35.

That employee was hiared by Trump Administration/