*sigh* [ see my post in the pre-draft thread: "Should Buffalo draft 1 of the 3 QBs at #9 if they're there?" ]
Posted 23 March 2014 - 03:20 PM
if the FO truly believes that EJ has a > 70% chance of becoming our franchise guy then i do not believe that they should draft a qb at 1. (football success is a probability, and i think ~70% is about the threshold that i'm comfortable with.) our FO got woods right, got kiko right, got FA 2013 right, got gilmore and glenn right, and im starting to trust them, so i'm willing to go along with their assessment of EJ.
that said, i really hate the idea of passing on bridgewater. i watch a fair amount of college football and i think this guy is a lot more of a sure thing than he's getting credit for in the media right now. i challenge you to find one game from the last two years that makes your nervous about drafting him. maybe it's because of the style of quarterbacks i've seen fail in a bills uniform, but i have more of an affinity for the guys who win by making the right decisions and are comfortable in a muddy pocket than i do for the guys drafted for their physical upside or arm talent. when you read criticisms of bridgewater what are the real reasons given for the authors doubt...
that he doesn't 'look like' a quarterback (too skinny)?
wilson and brady should have taught you better than that.
that he had a subpar pro-day?
funny how everyone says pro days don't mean sh*t until a prospect's pro-day performance fits their argument.
im starting to get the suspicion that bridgewater is being undersold for two reasons:
1) he's gotten 'boring' because he has been in the conversation for so long, and everyone's just overexcited by new, trendy prospects like bortles
2) 'pocket-passer racism' - that scouts are only comfortable with black quarterbacks when they're five star athletes who they can label as 'mobile'
and both of those reason are entirely illegitimate.