Brandon

Thank goodness. I absolutely did not want Chop Robinson. Can't get to the QB in college, usually won't happen in the NFL.

I agree completely. I'm not sure the Bills see it that way.

If they take Worthy, I'd give it about a 95% chance that the Bills are going to take a CB.

I agree. I'm just saying that's how they would justify it. In reality, its because they can't help themselves.

That's the idea.

The Bills argument would be that they just lost their #1 CB in Tre White and desperately need another one or we're totally doomed.

Not yet.

Pfft...everyone in the Bills' draft room is hyperventilating watching these DBs fall.

I wouldn't. I worry that any DE will end up buried as the #4 this year.

He was the only DE I'd have wanted the Bills to draft in R1, contingent on the medicals.

Oh thank goodness. I did NOT want the Bills to make that huge trade up.

Bears pick is in. I have to think that's Odunze.

Huge reach for a team that doesn't need a QB at 8. Wow.

That guy seems thrilled to go to the Chargers.

I'm also of the belief that it'll be Ladd McConkey if they keep the 28th pick. I see him as the best overall fit for the type of player they seem to value at WR. I'm a little uncertain of the R2 pick. I could see it as WR again, DL or DB. I do think most of the 4th-7ths will be defense. In general, though, I expect a quality approach to the offense, quantity on defense.

Same **** every year. I'm not going to say they absolutely have to draft a WR in R1 and obviously I don't know how they have their board graded. But otherwise, I agree. If you want to prevent that scenario you described with a defensive pick, you're going to need to draft an all pro at 28. Realistically, well, good luck with that.

I don't think it's a certainty that they draft a WR at all. I think that Latu and DeJean will be two players the Bills would be highly interested in, though Latu would have some medical questions. As for the WR depth...if they go another direction at 28, I think it likely forces a trade up in R2. There's good depth at WR, but once the run starts, they're going to fly off the board quick, and it's going to be getting very thin around the middle of R2. Late 1st round DEs scare the hell out of me, anyway, but I'd be particularly concerned right now that a rookie would end up buried as the #4 on the depth chart, average 8 plays per game and have two sacks and a dozen tackles by the end of the year.

As long as it doesn't send the Bills' front office into panic mode to go after a CB...

Ricky Pearsall. I think he's a top 40 or so player in this draft, but I wouldn't be surprised if he sneaks into the end of the 1st.

As if a 4.41 isn't fast. It confirms what he did on the field. He's fast. He runs by people.

I don't really see it with Odunze. He is quick through his routes and I think he'll be a good possession receiver, but I didn't see much speed or downfield separation. I liked Polk better on the downfield stuff. Hands and adjustment on contested catches is good, not great. Not impressed with the QB at all on a lot of throws to Odunze, so that his a factor, but I don't see a top 10 kind of prospect. Admittedly, this was more an initial impression from a casual watch of all of his targets this year. I don't think the Bills have a realistic shot at him anyway. Now, that being said, I realize I'm just some guy watching this crap at home on his couch. What the hell do I know? I've been wrong before, and generally, if I'm against the popular opinion, I tend to think I'm wrong. But that's my quick impression.

Well, then they're screwed. With the WR depth chart being what it is, whomever they select damn well better be able to produce at least at a halfway decent level this year.

There were a lot of rumors last year regarding the Bills interest in Addison, in particular, but all three were top 30 visits.

Throw some more money and high picks at it. I'm sure it'll be different this time.

It also provides more incentive for the teams drafting ahead of us to draft a highly rated rookie WR themselves rather than trade down. And, of course, more expensive to convince them otherwise.