Brandon

Bills 34 Dolphins 24

I was concerned that it was an eye injury.

I believe the Smith Act is still in effect in the United States. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

Honestly, the first response was a question, not a statement. I thought I had remembered someone saying that, but I've heard so much that's true and so much that's BS that it's hard to keep it all straight. I do think it was very likely politically motivated, but our information is limited right now and it's all just speculation. The truth will become apparent soon enough, whatever that truth may be.

Apparently, it was the Governor of Utah who had made statements along those lines, that a family member indicated that he'd become more political and that he had some issue with Kirk at a recent family dinner. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/12/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-invs

Didnt his family tell investigators that he had become radicalized and hated Charlie Kirk? That seems to very strongly suggest a political motive to me.

Leave the rookie in there unless he proves he shouldn't be.

Who the hell is Draymond Green and why is this person's opinion worth anything?

Republican run cities? Memphis has had one Republican mayor since the 1960s (for one year) and St. Louis hasn't had one since the 1940s. I'm going to guess that the other two are similar.

I don't know about visas, but the phrase 'right of the people' does not always extend to everyone in the country. The most obvious example is with regard to 2nd amendment rights for those in the country illegally. Form 4473 asks this question specifically.

I'm willing to keep an open mind and not totally dismiss the possibility that my preconceived assumptions are incorrect, but I tend to agree. At least in my experience, I've seen that term used far, far more often by those on the left to describe conservatives. I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but I don't recall ever seeing it used in another context with reference to modern politics.

Yeah, it's very occasionally warranted, but only for a damn good reason. The photoshopped Trump t-shirt in the post I first quoted is an example of the other side of that coin, however...the land of lies, distortion and bull****.

Yes, but it's generally not advisable to go running off into conspiracy theory land.

That's why it's best not to trust anything that's not being officially released by law enforcement that are directly involved in the investigation.

That seems the most likely to me, but I also think we're at that stage where people will see what they want to see. The truth will be known soon enough as they go through his phone, computer and social media activity, as well as if there are any statements publicly by those who actually know him. The asswipe in question is in custody, though, and I would assume he'll start talking sooner or later, anyway.