Jump to content

Brandon

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,805
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Brandon's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (6/8)

633

Reputation

  1. I'm not against it, assuming they also add a quality 1T early as well. I think they only really need a 1T and a CB, so they have an early pick to spare.
  2. Grant or Harmon. I don't care which. Their DL got shoved all over the field most of last year and that's something that can't continue. There's a good argument for a CB here as well, but I have more confidence in the FO finding a good CB on day 2 than I do for a 1T.
  3. I'm working under the assumption that we expect both to become All Pro type players at their positions. The DE probably does have more impact, if you hit on the pick, but I think the CB is less risky. But if you see Hunter as just a good CB, then yes, you probably should roll the dice on the upside at DE.
  4. Travis Hunter. The pass rushing DE probably has a bit more upside if he hits, but, as a general rule, I also view the risk with a pass rushing DE as considerably higher than with a CB (in fact, I view pass rushing DEs as the most difficult position to draft aside from QB). In that sense, given two elite prospects, it becomes a risk management game for me.
  5. On general principle, as boring as a 1st round pick at CB is, I wouldn't absolutely hate it given the need, but I'd be concerned if they pick a guy coming off a major injury.
  6. Just based on the list of pre-draft visits, I think you're right. They seem to be doing most of their work at WR on guys projected to go on day 3. I'm not sure I like that, either, but if I had to guess, CB, DT and DE are the likely day 1 and 2 picks, barring trades.
  7. At a glance, matching player visits with the round I'd expect them to be selected, I'm thinking DT, CB and DE in some order with those first three picks, with the WR being a R4 or 5 guy. I don't necessarily like that, either. I'd like to see them take a WR earlier, assuming the value isn't out of balance.
  8. It's really close, but I think I'd take advantage of the DT depth, double up at 1T and take Collins. Royals would be my 2nd choice. A CB would be my preference here, but it seems like the value isn't there. In this type of scenario, I would expect the Bills to trade up for a CB here or trade out of the pick if they can't.
  9. I don't like the available group of four choices and would much prefer to trade down. Of the players not listed in the poll, I'd consider Josaiah Stewart, Jaylin Noel, Elic Ayomanor, Jalen Royals or even another CB here. I would much prefer a good 1T DT, but I think they've missed out on value in R2 and should wait until 109 (or maybe trade up from that spot in the mid/late R3 range). If absolutely forced to choose from this group of four, I'd probably take Farmer and would not be too happy about it.
  10. I'm not a huge fan of taking two defensive backs in a row, but this is a relatively easy choice...I would select Watts. I'm surprised that Farmer is polling this well. He doesn't seem like a great fit here and is likely to be 2nd in the rotation to Ed Oliver. They need a 1T and I don't think Farmer is that.
  11. I've been saying that for three or four years (and the same for a big, short yardage RB). They haven't done it yet.
  12. Seems like a great deal for minimal risk to me.
  13. Beane always signs three or four inexpensive veterans to give himself options going into the draft.
  14. That's good, he's becoming an excellent player and I'm glad the Bills recognize his value to the team. I'm guessing that the first two or three seasons are relatively team-friendly as well.
×
×
  • Create New...