WIDE LEFT

So the Jets defense had absolutely nothing to do with; the Pats just played like dog crap for their home opener on Thursday night football. . Sure. And Tampa played like crap the week before and couldn't do jack against Jet defense. The Jets defense which was the 5th rated defense in the NFL last year. I guess most of the offenses they faced last year just played like dog crap. Just all one big coincidence.

You mean like the Patriots spanked them. It is not a bad football team. The Jets have a great defense, which makes any team very competitive.

It's obvious a defensive coordinators main objective/strategy is to limit the other teams scoring, and holding a team to a field goal is always better than giving up a TD. I have to wonder whether defensive coordinators adjust this basic strategy to fit the changing game situations. A classic example is the Bills Monday night loss to Dallas, when Dallas had only one choice, to throw a quick sideline pass to get some yards and stop the clock, but our DC never adjusted to take that away, and worse yet, when questioned about it after the game did not seem to even understand the question. I note this because as much as I like Mike Pettine, I have to question whether he really understood the game strategy at the end of Pats game. With the Pats driving and within (long) field goal range, I noted,when watching NFL game rewind, that he continued to play his safeties 15-20 yards off the line of scrimmage. Although its usually the case that giving up a field goal is preferable to giving up a TD, the opposite was true in this game situation. The correct strategy, based on that unique game situation, was to play the safeties up, take away the short pass, and force Brady to beat you with a long pass downfield. A quick TD at least gives you the ball back and a chance, conceding short passes is a slow death that never gives you a chance It just appeared that our DC failed to appreciate in that unique game situation that giving up first downs was worse than giving up a long pass. He simply failed to adjust to the game situation. Disappointing.

So the OP's statement is that the read option is rendered ineffective if the QB never runs the ball. It's what makes the read option offense so effective (for the rest of teams that run it), that, is the additional threat of the QB running with the ball. If EJ never takes off with the ball, our read option will be ineffective, as it certainly was in today's game. But our genius here blathers on about free tickets and doozies, because he does not have an actual football take as to how you can run a read option offense but never, not one time, actually have your QB run the ball. A number of third and short opportunities were missed today, first downs that could have been picked up by our big and mobile QB.

Well sure, lets not provide any criticism at all of the highest paid wide receiver on the team, who has a disturbing habit of dropping passes at the worst time. If memory serves me right, this is not the first pass he has dropped in a critical situation. But god forbid, lets not "rehash" it. Because this board is only here for the purpose of praising these players, not for criticizing them. After all they only play this game for the love of it, and should never be called out for mistakes, no matter how many times they happen.

It's nice to have a veteran presence like good old Stevie Johnson, who drops yet another critical ball in a clutch situation. Hey Stevie, instead of running your mouth, how about helping your rookie QB, and your team, by catching a routine, 4 yard pass.

Okay the read option simply does not work if the QB NEVER runs the ball. So we cannot pick up a third and three because our OC will not allow our 240 lb QB to run just one time. Terrible

Tim Graham took to twitter yesterday to comment on the fact that that the Bills wanted a 3 week exemption for Byrd so that they could sit (and not pay)him on opening day. Graham' s take was that it was his "sense" that the Bills wanted to sit Byrd on opening day not because he would not be ready, but just out of "spite". If you take this at face value, what Graham is suggesting is that Brandon, Whaley etc are lying when they say the organization is totally committed to winning/excellence, and would actually make a decision like this out of spite, even if it compromised Bills chances to beat the Pats. Of course, Graham offers no evidence or substance of any kind to support his "sense". It is, in fact, nonsense and a very cheap shot, totally unsupported by anything but his imagination. This is the quality of reporters we have covering the Bills. Yikes.

Stake Out is probably the closest to MGM

Well he proved exactly nothing in his first preseason game. And I hope the starting job in Buffalo is not determined by freak (or lack of) freak accidents. I hope and pray EJ is the real deal, and I tend to think he is. The only point was that the Colts game did not show that one way or the other. And practices are not NFL games.

Could be the case. But I hope he actually proves himself wins the starting job on merit, rather than just being handed the starting job regardless. But I recognize there are many (like you) who believe he should and will be starting QB no matter what.

Believe me, I would love to see E J emerge as the clear and convincing winner of the QB competition and start on opening day. But it's not a done deal. I missed the original broadcast of Colts preseason game and after hearing all the hype about the 95 yard drive at the end of the half, I could not wait to see the replay. I did note that the national media was much less enthused about EJ performance than our local media. Upon seeing the replay, I could see why. I mean, please, a third string defense playing the softest prevent defense imaginable produced one easy read and one easy pass after another. The TD toss was pretty good though. But this was nothing that a rookie Trent Edwards could not have done in his sleep. So I retain high hopes for EJ, but there was little in that preseason game that sheds any light as to just where he is as an NFL QB.

It's more than a little frustrating reading how the Bills are struggling all training camp with weak play at the left guard position. There have not, in recent years and beyond, been very many successful draft choices. Levitre was a great choice, and after finally hitting on a good draft pick he is gone after four years, just as he enters the prime of his career. I don't know how you build long term success when you let your few successful draft choices walk. I wonder if Byrd is next. So now a weakness exists where there was a strength. And Bills sitting 20 million plus under the cap. This is not to argue that the Bills should have matched the mega contract Levitre got, but rather that they should have recognized a quality player and extended his contract early on, where the cost would have been manageable, something akin to what Pats did with Gronkowski.

No DVR - will miss the live broadcast as well. Channel 7 used to replay preseason games, but I think those were blacked out home games.

Any of our local channels going to replay the Colts v Bills preseason game? I see NFL network with a replay at 3:00am Tuesday morning.

King doing his annual rounds of NFL training camps, and just posted the four most impressive NFL rookies he has seen so far. E J was one of those four.

Please - the rarest and most sought after skill set (after QB) is the ability to rush the passer. Mario, even in an injury tinged off season, had 10.5 sacks. That's just year one of his contract. No way you toss that kind of ability aside. Bills have plenty of cap space, and you do not get better by cutting your best pass rusher. I can't believe that even has to be said.

Door opens for Hughes in a big way, and this D will be great if he can finally play to his potential. This D is the perfect fit for him.

I am the OP and the fool.

The OP is a fool who should have known better.

So we have a brand new head coach, a brand new offensive system, brand new defensive system and a rookie QB. So why are the Bills starting training camp so late? Cowboys, with a veteran QB and same O system start camp on 7/21, we start camp a week later. I hear the Bills coaches talk how important OTA's etc are, but if thats true, why do they give up a whole week of practice and familiarization with new coaches/systems.?

The terrible O line excuse is tired and a cop out. A good and decisive QB does well behind any line. I recall the year Brady was hurt in game one and his replacement ended up being sacked 40+ times that year, while that same O line had given up the least amount of sacks the year before,when Brady was the QB. I hope for the best with Kolb, but his history of taking lots of sacks is not encouraging - very Rob Johnsonish if you ask me.

I lived there for 25 years and raised two children there. Moved back to Buffalo in 2007. I lived in the Northwest part, basically Summerlin and would recommend that area. There are a number of nice areas, and would find the best school as a guide as to where to live. My girls turned out fine and received a good (public school education). Just make sure you settle in the right area.

So Jerry Sullivan spends a lot of newspaper space in his column today to let us know that when it comes to the Hernandez matter, we should all feel sorry for the victim, not the NFL. Gee Jerry, in your next column you should tell us that we should all oppose hurricanes and famines. I mean, I know you referenced one caller to a talk show who stated he felt sorry for the NFL, but one moron in a country of 300 million people does not a consensus make. Take note, Captain Obvious, that I seriously doubt that there was even one person in your Western New York readership population that woke up this morning and thought to himself (herself) "gosh I really feel sorry for the NFL today". But I am glad that Jerry let us know that he feels bad for the victim and not the NFL. In next weeks column, I understand that he is going to let us all know that he opposes cancer, and we should too.