OK, as the board expert on all things Browns and Cleveland, here are the factors: 
  
1)  This matter went to a jury trial.  The jury only took 35 minutes to come back with an acquittal. 
  
2)  I know Droughns' attorney personally...he knows the DUI laws inside and out and is very capable.  I thought he did a really good job. 
  
3)  If Droughns would have been found guilty, the judge in Medina would have put the screws to him. 
  
4)  The matter happened in Brunswick, Ohio; which is a fairly well-to-do southern suburb of Cleveland.  The Medina municipal jury probably consisted mostly of upper-middle-class persons. 
  
5)  I've done plenty of DUI cases over the years.  They are difficult to win. If Droughns had blown, say a .12 rather than .08 (right at the limit), he would have pled guilty.  He was right at the borderline, but his attorney presented a good case and prevailed. 
  
Simple as that. 
  
Mike