klos63

That's pretty good.

Thanks, I'll just avoid your comments.

this is what I meant. Go buy signage material, take the time to make the sign and bring it in the stadium.... get a life.

I'm a party pooper I admit it. no problem, about as painful as reading your OPINION( see what I did there)

that was my sign, come up with your own.

How about this.... let's all see if we can grow up a bit and stop with the childish nicknames. Belicheat, Cheatriots...they are not(and never were) clever, funny, creative or anything to feel good about. I really doubt that will happen, though. If anyone really spends time and money buying signage material, makes the sign, brings it in to the stadium and thinks they are cool, you need to get a life.

especially when you look at the Won Lost records

just the negative fans. I know a lot of fans like me since 1970 and before, we are pretty positive most of the time, especially after a great win.

But we didn't lose it not even close to losing it , so maybe he did the right thing despite what all the experts here think. If we lost or almost blew it at the end because we sat on the lead, that would be one thing, but we didn't.

I'm pretty happy today. We beat a team with dynamic QB that has been a super bowl contender the last couple seasons. I wasn't expecting perfection or total domination, so I felt very good about where are team is right now, realizing this is a very new offense, with new parts, a qb making his first start... and it's only one game. The main objective was to win, we did that. We ran often, had a big play pass TD, a big play rush TD, no turnovers.... kind of what we expected with this coaching staff with their reputations. What didn't you like about his schematic designs?.... specifically please so I can understand better.

exactly, people do this all the time. If you take away the 80 yard TD run, he only ran for 50 yards..... duh

you gameplan for a specific opponent based on their strengths and weaknesses, I think the goal of each game is to win first and not worry about 'exposing' your playbook. And just because you use a play today doesn't mean you have to use it next week. This really isn't that complicated.

He attempts to stop the run first, like almost any other coach would do. Then you force us to throw, which most defenses want you to do. I don't think McCoy is less dangerous on the outside, I think he is quite dangerous if he gets around the corner.

I understand what you are saying, but I don't think that's an appropriate way to asses a football game. Almost every play is designed to score a TD or at lease get a big gain, when it works it shouldn't be discounted. I bet there is. Even if I don't know what the explanation is. I can't see any team sandbagging, would be unforgivable to lose a game because of that.

Doesn't make any sense to worry about the next opponent in the middle of the game. Isn't this where fans accuse teams of looking past an opponent. They had a nice long drive to start the 3rd, I think he called a smart game.

why is it questionable for the rest of the season? because you're not sure about it?

If Fred couldn't understand what his situation was , then he isn't very bright. He knew the GM wanted to release him in March. Most fans knew there was a good chance he would be gone.

I was in Italy in 1994, met some Italian kid, liked American football, Bills were his favorite team, couldn't understand how one team could lose 4 Super Bowls in a row. Maybe you don't hang around with intelligent football fans. Out here in AZ and all my friends around the country that are football fans are well versed on the Bills.

I understand how the game works, that's why I laugh when people talk about at least 8 in the box.

so maybe 9 or 10? Are you really serious? I see this type of stuff written a lot. First, formations change all the time, from play to play.... , Second, Say we have 3 WR and Clay lined up wide- do you honestly think a defense will leave 1 or 2 of these guys uncovered?

Please explain this to me, sorry if I don't get it. I'm looking at the list of players that make up the $15M, I thought on the top 51 players counted vs the cap, many of the players on the list were certainly in the 53-75 count of players before last cut. How does this help our cap situation, except for Cassel, obviously.

I've heard others say the same, what is this based on? From what I heard and it sounds like you as well, he's shown nothing. Nothing.

Sure, I'm with you on it. And TT has been on the sidelines with Flacco for 4 years, he is a veteran that worked with a Super Bowl winning QB and a solid organization, i think he has learned a lot. I haven't heard one good about O'Leary this camp, what do you like about him? I don't think liking Karlos Williams puts you in the minority. I have a hard time believing that an experienced OC and QB coach can't offer game time advice because of either time or knowledge. On the other side of the ball, I often see Belichek find time to talk to his defenses and he is a Head Coach.

That's what the QB coach, OC are for.

I think one other aspect of all this gets overlooked. The rule about PSI and having the teams be in control of game balls all week was put into place, at the urging of Brady and Peyton, in order to allow the QB's play at the highest level they can achieve. They have control over PSI, they can scuff the balls all week, break them in to their liking. It seems like a poorly written rule, but the point of it was to allow each QB to 'customize' the game ball , within limits, to whatever suits them best. If you allow this, they should have more leway in PSI range. It's overblown because it's the Patriots and Brady. It's time to put this to rest and concentrate on more important things , like the regular season for our Bills.