Dan

Holy crap tie game!

Mo is defintiely shifting. Question is can the Colt D do something and actually stop Brady?

Cindy Margolis, now.

You and me both. Talk about bum luck to lose on that draw.

Absolutely! Horrible.

Don't know, nor care.

I just calls 'em as I sees 'em.

Yep, it's Manning that's out there o defense and allowing Brady to throw t owho ever he wants. Ans its Manning that's dropped about 3 balls that landed on his hands. The Colts, as a team, are blowing this. Not just Manning.

How is Manning to blame for that Marvin drop?

friggin pats this game is startin to suck!

That figures. Thanks.

I thought you couldn't fumble forward into the endzone and recover for a TD? Can someone please clarify the rule?

Exactly my thoughts.

Yet, somehow he's on the verge of starting in the Superbowl. Whatever he's doing, he's doing enough of it to keep that team winning. It's not all about the plays, sometimes its about the other things.

Agreed, he appeared to have 2 knees, 1 elbow, 1 shoulder, and perhaps a head on the ground before the ball came flying out.

I'm thinkin that's why they kicked. Lovie saw Grossman miss an easy touchdown and figured he'd take the sure points.

Talk about a HOSE job!!! No way that's a fumble. No WAY! So much for the NFL wanting the Saints to win.

Huge balls call on 4th down. I would have kicked the fieldgoal, no questions asked.

Bears blew a great chance there. Just fall on it!!

Why all this encryption? If you have actually have a friend, why not say my friend Bill with the Colts says.... ?? Are NFL scouts not supposed to have friends?

If you say it loud enough and long enough, it becomes true.

I promised myself I wouldn't do this, but what the hey... I'm bored. "I'd take a Kenny Davis in his prime over McGahee any day." Well as long as we're randomly picking players, I'd take Franco Harris over Willis too. What's the point of selecting players at random and comparing them to Willis? "McGahee's just not a likeable guy" There's at least 3 chicks with babies that would disagree with you (or at least would have). I imagine there's a few others that like him as well, somewhere. Bottom line is, you're integrating your personal opinon into an arguement that doesn't require it. Not to mention the fact that I'd warrant a guess that you don't know Willis on a personal level; therefore, your like and dislike are based on incomplete data. "...he's a stud running back who can carry the team into the playoffs." I'm not sure anyone has said he's a stud (well actually having three babies with three women would certainly qualify him as std, but I imagine not in the sense you're using it) or that he'll carry us to the playoffs. I've only said that he's average to above average; whereas, we have many other players that are below average. Doesn't it make sense that they should be replaced first? Smith was rode out of town because he wasn't good enough to get us to the playoffs either; but somehow the Patriots rode him right to a Superbowl win. I'd argue Willis is at least as good as Smith was. So why can't we keep him around and worry about the other aspects of the team that are in more dire need of upgrade?

We all work and go home and do various things. As long as we get to work the next morning and do a good job, it shouldn't matter what we do all night. My guess is that if you held everyone on the board (when they were in their 20's) to the same standard that we want to hold these athletes to the vast majority would fail miserably. Drugs, excessive drinking, promiscuity, talking without thinking, riding motorcycles without helmets, etc. are all common day occurences in American society. No one is ever as perfect as you think they are. Get over it, judge Willis and the other players by what they do on Sunday afternoon. I thought there was some thing about not judging others. I reckon all Bills fans are in line for Sainthood. (I might believe that but I've seen some of those tailgate pics and youtube clips.) The fact is Willis has been average to above average as a RB. Should we keep him another year? Given the alternatives, yes (IMO). Should we sign him to a huge money extension, no (IMO). But, there are far greater problems on this team than a RB that's averaging 1,000 yds a season. Deal with those problems, first; then worry about Willis. I would suggest that the majority of Willis' problem could be remedied with proper coaching and better OL play. If after another year he's no better (or if he doesn't want to play with a solid #2 back), then he gets cut. But, not before.

And people wonder no one ever wants to say anything in a press conference or to a newspaper reporter. No matter what they say, it gets misconstrued and comes out bad to someone. First Willis is damned because he made a stupid statement. Now he's damned because he apologized. Face it, many here appear to hate Willis no matter what he does on or off the field. And long after he's gone, many of these same people will be hatin on another player for some reason or another. I mean, come on, the guy asked for a contract extension so he can play in Buffalo longer; and even that gets turned around into a negative. I think that pretty well sums up the irrationality of the anti-Willis crowd.

I haven't read this entire thread, but in the few posts I've read its gone from ridiculous to hilarious to atrocious. So much so wrong, I wouldn't know where to start. Whitner was a good pick, get over it. He started every game this year, and probably will for years to come. Furthermore in those starts he was a solid player that didn't get routinely burned. What more do you want in a footall player? Draft position is irrelevant. Peters wasn't even drafted. Does that make him less of a lineman than a first round pick? McCargo: the jury is still very much still out due to injury.