Dan

In this instance, I would think that replacing Fairchild with the mascot would yield a better offense. Our offense was miserable last year, partly because of the players. However, primarily because Fairchild literally appeared to be standing on the sidelines with a copy of Football for Dummies. When you hear commetnts like, "we practiced plays all week, but never used them in the game" you can only conclude that Fairchild was inept, at best. Couple that with a complete lack of situational awareness, a complete lack of understanding your player's strengths, and what do you have - complete incompetence. So, yes, there are plenty of question marks with regards to the players improving or not. And much of our season will depend upon Edwards continued improvement; the ability of Hardy to contribute, etc. However, there is no doubt that Schonert will be better than Fairchild. Will he be the best OC in the league, perhaps not, but better than Fairchild, yes.

This post pretty well sums up your very biased view that everything the Bills do is bad and everything the the other team does is good. You say... "we weren't really that much better than the Jets and Fins." So, how do you explain us beating both of those teams twice in one season? "They nearly beat us" is your argument; therefore, we're not much better than they were. However you further reinforce this negative stance when you bring up the Ravens and Skins. We beat a playoff team and rather than conclude that was a good thing; you state we almost lost. So, by that logic are the Giants bad because they almost lost to the Bills? What about the Browns, they barely beat the lowly Bills? How could either of those teams be playoff caliber, let alone Superbowl contenders if they almost lose to a team as bad a Buffalo? For that matter the Cowboys, a 13-3 team, almost lost to the Bills and needed a last second miracle to not lose. They must really suck. Why can't you give the Bills credit for anything? Despite the injuries, they were a competitive team that took several playoff teams to the wire and won most of the games they should have won. Those are positives. And I bring up the injury thing, because you so easily want to dismiss it. But, I ask you.. please name the last team that had 17 players (starters or not) on IR and were even competitive let alone in a position to make the playoffs in the last month of the season. Please. Regardless of what you want to say, when nearly 1/3 of your opening day roster does not see the season end, its far more likely that you'll end up with the Dolphins' record than the Bills' record. And that is precisely why so many people give Jauron and the Bills credit for last season and expect good things in the upcoming one. Will we have a good season? I don't know. But, I hope we do. Perhaps I'm not a "realist" as you are? Perhaps I don't see the team for how bad they really are, as you do, but rather for how good they can become? Perhaps I'm just a fan of a team with a dream.

no thanks needed.

Hamdan does indeed still Rock!

... if Hamdan plays, the league shuts down as all QB and scoring records are shattered. The rest of the league realizes there's little to play for now that they've seen the Chroise. We win all Superbowls from now on by default because Haman smites any that would take the field against him.

I couldn't disagree more. Why should kids be praised for anything and everything they do? Just because they're kids and we want to encourage and support them? I say... no. All that does is perpetuate mediocrity and give them a false image of the real world. Hold them to a higher measure and they'll be stronger for it. First of all, any person, big or small, should be held to the same standard by the paper. I don't know if this is an editorial or what, but it should be. He's only writing his thoughts on the matter. And, if I may say so, his thoughts are reflective of a 15 year old that doesn't know much about how the world really works. Perhaps I sound jaded, but that's reality. "Why didn’t he step forward and confess that he was driving the car that hit Kimberly Shpeley if he unknowingly struck her as he claims?" Although this is a nice notion and sounds all rosey and good. The reality is... if any person, Lynch or not, comes out and does that, they would be legally crucified, and cost themselves millions (perhaps) of dollars. My immediate thought is.. does this kid confess all his actions to his parents every day? Does he come home from a party and say wow Mom I got loaded last night jumped into a pool naked or whatever it is he may do. My guess is not. Why? Because no one openly and readily admits all guilt and then awaits punishment to the fullest extent possible. Bottom line: We all have opinions. None are necessarily right or wrong. They're just opinions. I think it important to remember that. I can only assume that this article was printed in an opinions section of the paper. If so, the only problem I would see is that its typically good to print a counter opinion as well.

63 to 37, in favor of Poe. Is that the best we can do?

With a few more posters like this and maybe TBD will go to the message board Superbowl.

Are we talkin about the Pats* now?

I'd disagree.

Well, I'm certainly a punk. But that really has no bearing on the discussion. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that Lynch played the entire incident perfectly. Most certainly, he should have stopped. I could even go further and say he probably shouldn't have even been driving. However, what I was referring to was.... upon realizing he screwed up, he did what he should do. Contact the team, contact his lawyer. Take their advice, i.e. shut up and let them deal with the police/DA. And keep it out of the press as much as possible. As far as the league is concerned, I would guess they'd prefer all players handle their legal issues like this - as opposed to addressing the media and turning the whole thing into a circus.

I would offer that "league-wise" Lynch did exactly what they would want. Upon waking up the next morning, his first contact is presumably to have been with the team, then his lawyer (perhaps the other way around). He took their advice and did exactly as he was told - nothing. Because of that, it's not been blown up in the national media and most people around the country don't know anything about it. If he would have come out the next day, addressed the media and publicly owned up to it, as people have suggested, this thing would have been all over ESPN and NFL Network and would be twice the story that it is. Consequently, the league would look much worse. IMO, Lynch did exactly what he should do. He called a good lawyer. He called the team's security guy. He did exactly as he was advised by these people. Now it's about to be resolved, rather quietly for the league.

So everyone IS drunk at 3:30am on Chppewa? I have a very good friend who routinely hangs at the bar with us all night and never drinks a drop. Assuming he was drunk is just as erroneous and assuming he was sober.

Don't feel bad. A great many people find themselves lacking that certain something from time to time. Heck we were all like that at some point. But, when you find the Chroise that all changes. You must toss aside the contrived notions that poise and strength are the path to greatness. Only then, shall you find the inner beauty of the Chroisen world. It takes time, it takes freedom from thought; freedom from prejudice. But, never fear, when you're ready... Haman will be there for you.

Perhaps I see the world with different eyes than most, but (1) I don't see the off season incidences here as being nearly as bad as several other teams. In fact, I would call this just about an average off season of legal run-ins. So, why is it that bad of an off season? And (2) I whole-heartedly disagree that we are seeing the "beginning of the Toronto merge". So, I reject that statement. So to conclude, what's not to be proud of? Making the playoffs does not make a great team. Being from Buffalo makes the team great. The Bills are the only team in the league worth cheering for.

Long live the Chroise!

Agreed. It looks like they had one of those contests for all the second graders and picked the best one. Its kinda like lets just take a bunch of clip art and throw it together some way. For those upset it doesn't have anything about Buffalo in it... what would you suggest? The Bills logo is perhaps all you need to suggest Buffalo. Plus, you're not promoting the Bills in Buffalo; you're trying to promote the Bills in Toronto. Hence, the Bills' logo plus all the Toronto clipart thrown in.

But you have to remember that a large number of people watch only the Fox News Network and they believe everything on it. They do believe it's fai and balanced. The single best thing the Republican Party has done in recent years to advance their agenda was to create the FNN and convince the masses that its a legitimate news network.

Given the amount of rotation between the defensive linemen, I'm not sure it matters who the starter is. Not to mention, that the depth chart will likely change between now and September.

Or a sign to hang at the stadium .... "The Chroisen Few"

I disagree. If I were on the Bills' staff, I'd probably be inclined to make similar statements. Do we want Peters in camp? Absolutely. However, in the meantime, we're moving guys around, and proceeding on without him and we'll be fine. I agree with many of the posts in this thread. Yes, Peters deserves more money. But, he just got a new contract. He should play a little more before demanding a new one and holding out. Yes, he's good. But, he's only been the best player in the NFL for 1 season (I'm being facetious, intentionally). He needs to prove that he can perform at the Probowl level more consistently before he gets the top 5 money, IMO. And regardless, holding out is not the way to get it. The Bills have shown with Schobel, Kelsay, Dockery, Walker, and Parish that if you work hard and they like you, they'll pay you.

Excellent post that should pretty much end any potential debate on this topic. I would think even a Strahan-biased fan could look at those numbers and draw the only possible conclusion... Bruce was easily the better player.

Hamdan still Rocks!

Interestingly... everyone that I've talked to is glad he's not been arrested and think this lady shouldn't have been walking around at 3am when drunks are driving around. And all of those people watch football on Sunday. I wouldn't call them grovelers either; but I would call them football fans. So, what's the difference? The definition of a functioning brain obviously differs depending upon whom you're talking to. And as far as I can perceive, you're the one being a turd.

Hamdan Rocks!