-
Posts
30,694 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Kirby Jackson
-
I feel like a lot of people are giving McDermott the benefit of the doubt because he’s done a great job. Doing a great job and being perfect aren’t the same thing. There is no logic in this decision. Harbaugh has done a great job too and is resting his guys. Being locked into a playoff spot is a reward for a great year. Take advantage of that by making sure you’re healthy in the playoffs. Don’t risk it.
-
I think this is fair. The problem is that you are drafting guys on what they will/can be not what they are today. That’s why Josh went in the top 10. 2 years in there is no reason to believe that the future of Baker or Darnold is brighter than that of Josh. Talent evaluators would absolutely roll the dice on the upside of Josh at this point before more established players.
-
I guess my point is that not playing basically means the chances of injury are zero. Every play that they play we are increasing the chance of injury. If the key guys play 2 drives (as an example) we are subjecting our 22 starters to a dozen plays each (or something like that). I just don’t see any benefit to Josh or Singletary or Brown or Edmunds or Tre or whomever important taking NFL contact a dozen times. If 1 guy gets hurt it’s an AWFUL decision. If every guy is healthy it doesn’t help anything. It’s not like you get to start with a 7 point lead in the playoffs if you play your starters the week before. If a key guy gets injured we basically can eliminate ourselves from the playoffs. If Josh goes down we are out of the playoffs. There just isn’t a benefit to that risk. If the Bills were competing for the division or even a higher seed it makes sense. It’s worth the risk. Baltimore has it figured out.
-
If they go down in a playoff game so be it. If they go down in the 1st game of the season so be it. If they go down in the 4th preseason game it’s foolish. This is the 4th preseason game. Nothing that happens this week alters anything in the teams future. If it had ANY impact I could see it. It is totally meaningless. The goal is to win in the playoffs. There is no reason to risk lessening your chance of that happening.
-
This is wrong but I’m not surprised from the website that believes Duck Hodges is the better player.
- 90 replies
-
- 15
-
-
-
-
Led the league in points by a lot, lost in the semi-finals by .64 and then outscored both finals teams by 50. I finished right around .500 in my other 3 leagues (combination of injuries and bad drafting). I hate fantasy football!!
-
When Was the Last Time Bills Could Rest Starters?
Kirby Jackson replied to Gugny's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
The year they started EJ in week 17 -
Rumor Roethlisberger done with Football
Kirby Jackson replied to Franchiseneedsme's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He was a great player and a terrible person. It will be pretty poetic if he and AB end together. Great players, bad people -
Not playing and falling off a cliff are 2 different things. If he retires obviously he won’t be here. If he plays he will do what he always does, produces. He’s a consummate professional that will be ending his career in a ring chase. You don’t think that he will be ready to go in that scenario? He’s going to finish the year with 75 catches and 820 yards (or something like that). If he give you 3/4 of that (which he absolutely will) we are talking about 56 catches for 615 yards. For comparison sake McKenzie and Foster have combined for 28 catches and 311 yards. That’s the spot that we are talking about for Fitz.
-
We disagree here he is the PERFECT fit for what we need. Brown, Fitzgerald, Beasley and a young stud. That’s a really good group with skills that offset one another. Fitzgerald is nothing like Vontae when we signed him. Davis was basically out of the league. Fitz has had pretty much the same year as Beasley. He will be effective for a year or 2 in that role. If he fell off a cliff (which won’t happen) you play the young guy and have his veteran presence in the room.
-
That’s another that I can go either way with. He’s inconsistent but has had his moments. If a clear opportunity to upgrade is available go for it but you could do worse. That’s kind of how I feel on the corner too if they bring back Kevin Johnson. Kevin Johnson and Levi Wallace are certainly serviceable.
-
I’m 100% with you on the needs Joe. I think that I would address them like this: - Sign Larry Fitzgerald to play the “x.” He fits perfectly for what we need and may come for a year or 2 to chase a ring (can’t believe I’m saying that). He still can play. - I’d draft a WR in the 2nd. You will get a guy in the 2nd that would have went in the 1st in every other draft because of the depth of the class. You may get a DoVonta Smith, or Tee Higgins or Antonio Golden-Gandy there. The receiver class is so loaded. - I’d draft Yetur Gross-Matos or A.J. Expensa in the 1st to be the pass rusher. - I’d re-sign Shaq and cut Murphy. Shaq would start and Gross-Matos or Epenesa would rotate in to rush the passer. - Sign Jack Conklin to play RT. You are probably looking at like 4 years $48M with $30M guaranteed. - I’d add a back like Carlos Hyde in FA. He’s having his best year but he’s a guy that you know can get you some yards still. He feels like a decent backup to Motor and can get 8-10 carries a game. - I’d draft a back as well. I’d want a guy that is an ideal “3rd down back” to complete the group. Someone like JJ Taylor out of Arizona would be interesting to me. Other than the needs addressed above I think you are looking for a replacement for Lorenzo, potentially a number 2 CB and maybe a kicker.
-
I think I'd rather have the Titans as #6 seed
Kirby Jackson replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
I think I'd rather have the Titans as #6 seed
Kirby Jackson replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
My brother and I have been discussing this. I think KC is the worst matchup for the Bills and the Titans can knock them out too. Pittsburgh has NO chance in the playoffs. They are a bye for whomever they play.- 87 replies
-
- 10
-
-
...and if he is ruled short New England doesn’t get points on that drive. You can’t use results from later in the game to justify the move at the time. The situation dictates your decision. Also, that runoff rule needs to change. Would they have gotten another play off? Probably not, but if the refs rule it a TD and then change their mind the Bills shouldn’t be penalized. It is much, much worse if it’s at like the 2 because a team COULD conceivably get another snap off. It happened earlier this year but don’t remember the game. I don’t know the answer but it’s something other than what it is now.
-
I think it’s an interesting topic. A lot of guys have started that way and loosened as time went on. I think that will happen more as McDermott grows more comfortable with Josh and himself. We need to be more aggressive with the challenge flag in addition to the play calling. Sometimes it may be close but the situation massive. That is of equal importance when it comes to using it. As an example he ABSOLUTELY should have challenged that 4th down run. They may not have overturned it (although I believe he was short) but the play was too important to look the other way. He should have been all over the refs about no call on the Brady intentional grounding. You do that stuff so the next close one goes your way. It’s all a part of game management.
-
It’s unbelievable. This was supposed to be different. This is the time where you let it all hang out. They’ve tried to allow 7 yards at a time and tried to gain 3 at a time. You don’t beat the Pats like that. Hit Brady and make him move off his spot. Step up and run Josh. Throw the ball down the field. Do something other than rolling over and allowing them to sink and dunk to death.