-
Posts
30,635 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Kirby Jackson
-
Kittle looking for a "Kittle Deal"
Kirby Jackson replied to Virgil's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
The market has already been reset by Hooper and Henry. Kittle is going by them. He’s going to be in the $15M range. -
Kittle looking for a "Kittle Deal"
Kirby Jackson replied to Virgil's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I’ll take a guess: 4 years, $60M with $42M guaranteed -
I never said that the league “wronged” AB. I said that “the game was taken from him.” I never said that it wasn’t warranted. In fact if you look back to the beginning of this conversation I said that “the AB ship had sailed for me. He’s too much of a problem.” I did say and do believe that players working out with AB is a good thing not a bad thing. His work ethic and precision is legendary. That’s how he became the player (not person) that he became. I don’t see that as a bad thing.
-
If your concern is that they are going out for drinks after and Brown is capable of anything in his private life, cool. I’ll 100% buy that. If your concern is that he will turn Diggs into a toxic person in the locker room, I’m sorry not buying that. His legendary work ethic is a great thing for Diggs to be around. The fact that he has had the game taken from him is a good lesson for Diggs. If they are out at the club, I wouldn’t like that either. Trouble follows Brown in his personal life. He’s ready, fire, aim.
-
I think that ship has sailed for me. A year ago I was all about it. That guy may just be too damaging. It would be interesting though to see if he’s at today’s workout. On IG, I’ve seen Barkley, Dawkins, Josh, Webb, Diggs, Motor, what looked like Beasley and I’m sure many more. If AB is there again it would certainly raise an eyebrow
-
Totally different with Byrd and Woods. Byrd signed a very large contract on a team that had very little cap space. Woods signed a moderate contract and the Bills had moderate cap space. Woods 2017 cap hit was $7M. The Bills wouldn’t have had to sacrifice ANYTHING to do that. They could have easily created that space by converting some future money for guys into signing bonuses. There was not a cap problem. There is virtually no such thing as a cap problem in the NFL. It’s a narrative used to sway fans to buy into a plan. It’s media created. Teams figured out YEARS ago how to navigate around it. This could change I suppose if revenues are negatively impacted by COVID. At this point though, teams no that future years will be bigger and structure contracts accordingly. Cap issues are not real unless you are incompetent (see the Falcons). I’m willing to die on this hill and can point to dozens of examples of teams in “cap trouble” manipulating the cap and not making any sacrifices. Unless the cap is punitive there are no issues.
-
Who specifically are you concerned will be gone? IMO, the Bills are about to follow the Cowboy’s model in retaining all of their top players on their second contracts. I expect the Bills to have Diggs, Edmunds, Tre, Dawkins, Oliver, Milano and (hopefully) Josh for years. They don’t have any cap issues now or in the next 5 years.
-
Who's your favorite Bill on the current roster?
Kirby Jackson replied to GreggTX's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Tre White -
Wait, the same guy?!? ?
-
Isn’ t he Jack Nicklaus’ grandson?
-
I expect Josh to become the guy too. With that being said, I guess the point that I was trying to make is that we should be prepared for a large QB contract either way. I don’t think that it will be a scrub(ish) vet or a young guy. We aren’t going to waste this window HOPING to find a QB. We are either going with Josh or Stafford (or Cousins even).
-
He wasn’t here for Woods. If they wanted to keep Woods (or anyone) they could have easily. They made a decision not to. They weren’t forced to. That’s the difference between cap problems and telling people that you have a cap problem. The Bills didn’t make one decision because they were forced to - not one. You don’t have a cap problem unless you are forced to make those decisions BECAUSE of the cap. The Bills made the decision to turn over the roster because they didn’t think that the players under contract were good enough to get the job done. The dead money was self-created because they wanted different players than the one’s under contract. Again, that was a choice. This is the plan that they entered the building with and it looks like the right one. The “cap jail” or “cap problems” though was nonsense. That’s not really a thing in the NFL unless you are incompetent. You can ALWAYS kick the can down the road. The Falcons have proven to be incompetent. The Bills were fine when it came to the cap. It’s just easier to sell people on patience when you say “we have a mess and it’s someone else’s fault. Give us time to fix this.” Beane is nobody’s fool. It’s hard to go from the middle to the top. That’s why they tore it down.