Prickly Pete

If looking at the offensive woes with "complexity" will make it better, I'm all for it. I'm just going by what I see, and it hasn't been good enough. I have to wonder if between Watkins, McCoy, and Tyrod, we have collected too many guys that may be fragile.

They were all there against the Patriots, and only one was out against the Giants, yet they were ineffective. Too many excuses. This offense isn't that good. I guess will will find out tomorrow, because they will all be playing. Or will it not count because it's the Patriots (who are riddled with injuries)?

Depth. I kind of agree that injuries are the problem, but are they ever going to have all these guys healthy for a significant amount of games? It doesn't seem likely.

I think Tyrod and Watkins are better, but I want to see a good, consistent offense, and I haven't. I think it's mostly the coaches.

I'm not sure what you are after, but I haven't been obsessed over like this since 10th grade.

I never said that. I said something is wrong if Watkins has the stats of the 244th receiver. That is totally different, and you know it.

This wasn't just a one week comparison, but regardless... http://fansided.com/2015/11/22/deandre-hopkins-smokes-darrelle-revis-for-touchdown-video/

So is Yates better than Tyrod, or is Hopkins better than Watkins? Or are they both better?

Yep, no problem. That will be easy...

With all these talented guys, and all these guys "creating space" for each other, I would think the offense would be a juggernaut. Yet they are 5-4 (and have one win against a team with a winning record), and the offense has had lots of struggles. I have seen the same people post: "Tyrod is playing great" "Watkins is playing great" "Woods is a really talented #2" "Clay is a great weapon" "Between McCoy and Karlos, we have a potent running attack" I want to believe, and on paper it looks good, but I have yet to see a consistent offense.

Me. I hate anything to do with the Cowboys. I hate the Cowboys more than any other franchise in the world.

If they aren't deliberate, but they aren't improvised, what is left?

Both great, LT is a better running back, but Thurman is a better "performer", as in clutch plays that win games. He is also a better receiver. Thurman every day.

They've won 2 in a row....

I never give him a click. I don't feel that he believes many of the opinions he presents as his own, and merely tries to stir up interest. I can get anything he has to offer, elsewhere on the net.

I think the difference to an OC, is that the player isn't executing the designed play. An OC wants consistency, they want to have a QB they can control. Some of that is ego, some of it is strategic.

I think they wanted him there in case Gronkowski got injured. I expected him to get injured, and that Chandler would get some good opportunities...he still might.

I'm right here to admit that things haven't gone as I expected. The season isn't over yet though, so I didn't feel the need to jump the gun. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. It will be cool when others on the board do the same...

Ha. More likely the magazine paid him to participate. That photo is ridiculous! When is he gonna come out? Reminds me of this video (that killed a career)...

I think Watkins is better than Hopkins. I think that there are many factors (I'm pretty sure I already posted them in this thread), why he isn't getting good stats. I mention Hopkins because his QB's have been as bad or worse than Watkins', but somehow they are finding a way to get him the ball, and he is finding a way to make plays.

DeAndre Hopkins is probably hoping the Texans try to acquire EJM. It's not all about the stats, but to say things have gone the way most anticipated is being disingenuous. I surely believe that Watkins can tear it up, if given the chance, though.

So now it's our fault...

It's not funny. If anything, the joke is on us (the fans).

I'm happy that he is playing so well, but it's about the whole defense, not one guy. I also feel he would be playing great for any team that would have drafted him. Can I prove it? No, but of course, the opposite can't be proven either. If Ryan has helped him along, great. But I want to see the guys that have ALREADY proven themselves, to play great in Ryan's defense too (Mario, Kyle, Marcel). They are 5-4, and lost to the Jags.

Not sure how the next 3 will turn out, but I just can't see these Bills winning more than 4 of the last 7. They don't play consistently enough to pull it off. Some will say "but it's the injuries". Yep, they have been consistently injured, and I think that will continue.