-
Posts
6,708 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Prickly Pete
-
Watkins Ruled Out For Sunday (Update - placed on IR)
Prickly Pete replied to BreezeMafia's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Dude, they can't even get a proper roster of STARTERS, and you are complaining about depth? -
Stop & Frisk Thread
Prickly Pete replied to ExiledInIllinois's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I don't think she really has any particular values, just whatever will defeat an opponent, and help her accrue power. Trump isn't much different, but somehow HIllary is presented as this great humanitarian, who has helped the disadvantaged, when it's all just political posturing, and career advancement. -
Yes.
-
Stop & Frisk Thread
Prickly Pete replied to ExiledInIllinois's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Trump "allegedly" called Machado "Miss Piggy", yet Hillary Clinton has "allegedly" used racial slurs and is abusive to Secret Service agents, her employees, her husband, and well, just about everyone. Bill Clinton has his own Racial Profiling / Stop and Search history in Arkansas.... http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/trump-racist-hillary-bill-used-slurs-profiling/ -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
So do the people in BLM (especially other blacks). Of course not. -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Explain it to Magox, Benny, and Dr. K. People of Color are being used as pawns. -
Refugee Crisis in Europe
Prickly Pete replied to Prickly Pete's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Just let the Muslim Mayor of London set his own immigration policy... http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/715172/Sadiq-Khan-defy-Brexit-London-open-visas-migrants-mayor-theresa-may-boris-johnson-trade -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
It's already unfolding in Europe. (So sorry about the apostrophe. Sometimes I'm distracted by 3 young kids, or in a hurry, so my proofreading suffers. Thanks for "powering through"). I have lived in LA for the last 20 years, my wife is Mexican, and our 3 kids are half-Mexican, my circle friends is over 50% Mexican, I spend nearly all my time with Mexicans, I love my wife's family (my family is in Buffalo), and I feel accepted. I also know how they feel about White America. They feel it is their land, and it was taken from them. And they feel any and all Mexicans should be able to live in the US. This is their sentiment, across the board. -
I can hear him saying "I was the President of the United States, and you're a nobody, a loser" as a retired old man.
-
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
He wasn't good. He should have just yada yada-ed, but he can't help himself. I don't agree that things will just continue as is. There is a coordinated effort to bring Muslim's into Western Society. It's not working, and is pushing the citizens in these countries to support the Far-Right. It's not just going to go away. -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
There is no way with amnesty for (11 million?) illegal aliens, millions of (1,2...5?) new Muslims, and the current state of race relations, that it's just going to be that simple, and "business as usual". How do you think these situations will evolve under Hillary? -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
So Ben, what do YOU see happening with a Hillary Presidency? I get it, you don't like Trump, and feel most (all?) of his supporters are racists, but what do you see in his alternative, Hillary? -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I mentioned awhile back, that the "Clockboy Scandal" opened my eyes to the strange attitudes of Progessives/SJW's. It was obvious that the kid was pranking the school, but among my peers there was no room to even question it without being called a racist. From there, the refugee crisis in Europe, and the suppression and censorship of information, completely convinced me that there was something insidious happening. I recall that after the Boston Marathon Bombing, the identities of the bombers, and the fact that they were Muslim's was immediately made available. Sometime after that, it all changed. Now in Europe they do everything to evade naming a Muslim as a terrorist. And in the US it is nearly the same. The media is involved (when all those news agencies used the word "dark" in their headlines to describe Trump's DNC speech...I don't know how anyone can deny collusion). I have been forced to plead the case for Trump, and I find that most people have very little knowledge of what's happened in Europe. Unless it's a hundred people getting run over, they don't know. Almost no one has heard about the Rotherham sex slave ring. When I tell them the situation, and show them videos, it seems to have an effect. Europe is further along in the process, so it's helpful to demonstrate where things seem to be headed. It's bizarre to me that the discussion of WHY we need to bring large numbers of Muslim immigrants into the US isn't really discussed. The argument about whether they SHOULD be allowed in, has turned into "we have Muslim's ready right now to bring over, and defeat the racists". Glossing over the fact that Hillary Clinton has been directly involved in creating the refugee crisis, I'm all for helping the refugees, just not giving them a home and citizenship in the US. It's completely counter-intuitive. -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I left out so much, but had to pick up my kid from school. Brazil, is where it's all going, basically. I can't believe it isn't obvious to every voter. I completely understand why Latinos and Blacks will vote for Hillary, but they won't realize until it's too late, that it will end up bringing virtually everyone in the country's standard of living down. Way down. Home ownership, building standards, education. The new HUD program subsidizing housing in higher income neighborhoods...I wonder how much of that will go to new immigrants, and will it be directed to Republican areas to change their demographics? Hmmm... I wanted to like Trump last night, but he really is a douche. I am hoping he can get in, bumble through 4 years (congress won't pass any of his proposals anyway, Bipartisan voting finally!), and then someone worthy rises up. But really, even if Trump gets in, and doesn't blow it, there seems to be no way to avert dystopia. -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I have been a lifelong Democrat, from a long line of Democrats (some politicians, Civil Rights lawyers) and even though I think Trump is a blowhard douchebag, can easily see where Hillary will take the country. First up, amnesty, and an increase in "refugee" immigration. That's lot's of Democratic voters (and they will be breeding at high rates). A big increase in social services, to provide for these new citizens. All paid for by the (mostly white) middle class. Of course she will talk about taxing the wealthy, but somehow that never works out. Never. More of the de-stabilization of middle-eastern countries (and more refugees!). More culture clashes spreading throughout Europe, and now the US. Lot's more immigrants from countries beyond Mexico (but crossing at that border), riding the wave. All will vote for the party that provides the more social services (Buffalo will be a great location for many, because it's cheap, and NY provides so many services). So it will either essentially be either a one party system, or 2 parties devoted to social services. Then there will be lots of affirmative action style mandates, but this time for women (and multi-genders), and more for minorities. No doubt Hillary will do for gender relations, what Obama did for race relations. Of course at the same, automation will eat up more jobs. With fewer jobs, more unskilled people, higher taxes, there will be higher crime rates. So that will mean "we need more rules, and restrictions", which will mean more arrests, and selective enforcement. The internet "hate speech" will be tied to terrorism, so there will be a push to rid the internet of anonymity. But who will decide what is "hate speech" and terrorism? Perfect time to use "selective enforcement". With the influx of Muslims, I have no doubt that Black communities will be culled for new members, so give that a couple generations to stew. I have heard rumbling about incarceration rates. To appease blacks, I can see more arrests and incarcerations of white folks, especially with the privatized prison system. $. Cops will pretty much have to wear riot gear to give out speeding tickets, and "no go" zones will become more widespread. Trump is a douche, and I don't know what he will do. But I know what Hillary is about, and these are just a few things I expect from her presidency. -
Debate: Round I - 26 Sept 20:00 EST on Fox
Prickly Pete replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
They are both repellent. I prefer Trumps policies. Trump got bogged down on some silliness, and didn't go for the throat. When Hillary mentioned tax returns, and his business practices, he could have demolished her with responses about her using her position as Secretary of State to sell out the country to donors of the Clinton Foundation. I have no idea why he didn't just crush her with that. No mention of the Mid-East policies directly causing the refugee crisis that is tearing up the EU. -
Johnny Hemet, what are your expectations for this season now? I don't see the Bills in the playoffs until Wrex is gone, Tyrod is no longer the starter (probably gone), and McCoy is gone (mainly because by the time the other 2 happen, and the team is good enough, they will likely have a different RB). Watkins is likely the only offensive skill position player that has a chance of seeing the playoffs as a Bill.
-
What next week really means.
Prickly Pete replied to 1st Ammendment NoMas's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It's true, week to week, but it's not too hard to figure out what teams probably won't make the playoffs after a few weeks. These Beeewwls? No playoffs for you! -
What next week really means.
Prickly Pete replied to 1st Ammendment NoMas's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It's the Wrex Rollercoaster. It ends up the same way...out of the playoffs -
-
This team will not make the playoffs.
-
It's the Wrex Rollercoaster.
-
Who exactly are the Bills supposed to throw the ball too?
Prickly Pete replied to San-O's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It's because I care. There seems to be nothing left beyond The Masquer's attitude, "We laugh to win!". -
Who exactly are the Bills supposed to throw the ball too?
Prickly Pete replied to San-O's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I'm still a fan of the "Rope-a-Dope Offense" in these situations. Just play terribly, and try to bring the opponents game down to your pitiful level. Then spring the deep ball on them. First step, a whole quarter of 3 and outs. -
I heard he wants to start with a team that hasn't made the playoffs in 30 years, with a weak QB, an OC that was promoted mid season, and in a small market.