4merper4mer
-
Posts
21,490 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by 4merper4mer
-
-
Next round 1 matchup:
Rob's House vs. TGreg99
Topic: Which aspect of the scourge that is Hollywood has done more damage to our country in the last 30 years.....sex or violence? All aspects of entertainment are included in this debate: Movies, video games, pop music, rap music, pop culture, etc..
-
Fine with me. Cows don't have sperm.
I appreciate the idea but don't see a point in insults or name calling. I respect everyone's opinion, even if I disagree. Good luck guys
I'm glad I eliminated you because you are too nice.
How the heck can cows not have sperm? Are they standing too close to the microwave?
Next round 1 matchup:
Rob's House vs. TGreg99
Topic: Which aspect of the scourge that is Hollywood has done more damage to our country in the last 30 years.....sex or violence? All aspects of entertainment are included in this debate: Movies, video games, pop music, rap music, pop culture, etc..
-
Winner: LeviF91.
There is good news for keepthefaith however. For the details see the main thread.
-
The winner of the first match is LeviF91.
I thought both participants excelled at this game and regret pairing them against one another. If all of the matches are this good it will be interesting.
LeviF91 was declared the winner for taking the more aggressive stance in the war of words. keepthefaith put up an admirable fight but in my judgement he was more responsive to LeviF91 whereas LeviF91 took the battle to him.
I can't say that I am convinced either way whether the Redskins should change their name or not. Both sets of arguments were good. For keepthefaith there is a silver lining:
Due to his disgusting habit of ingesting cow sperm and his initial reluctance to be insulting , Jboyst62 has been eliminated from the competition. keepthefaith has inherited his first round entry and will be matched up against someone else later in the round. LeviF91 is moving on to the second round.
Don't get too cocky guys, there were several possible finishing moves that you both missed, but the overall effort was solid.
The next first round match up will be announced soon. I will leave the LeviF91 vs. keepthefaith thread up for 2 or 3 days for everyone's reading enjoyment.
-
is it just progressives that got nauseous watching jerry jones' son in law wipe his glasses for him or were conservatives sickened, too? i think that would be a good topic for your game.
It would be if I watched anything involving Jerry Jones. Ever.
How can I judge something I have never seen? Actually I think I could, but I still think the topic stinks.
I'm thinking about the topic of Who is the biggest chicken, Chickendog1960, 3rdnchicken or Same Old Chicken but there are 3 and that would mess with the pairings.
-
lmfao just started looking into what this is...wow...
4mer's first argument topic should be to defend this game against whoever he is against. Talk about lame.
Says another chicken.
-
the guy that you describe is most apt to be the one that cheats the most, plays best ball in the group with the best ringer, posts 20 under and drunkenly and with faux modesty accepts his trophy in the luncheon afterward. current or ex jocks that can really play like the "real athletes" you describe are those most likely to complain when the organized cheating gets out of hand and winning becomes meaningless. i suspect it's much the same on message boards.
Dude.
You seem more bitter than overripe turnips.
-
I have to figure out a way to work charity golf tournaments into the mix here because there is some good stuff. Who knew?
WOW again. keepthefaith off the mat and swinging. Not enough insults until the very end, but other than that nearly flawless. You even avoided putting a team in a podunk town for once. IMO you two are back on level footing. keepthefaith might have even drawn ahead if he had worked more insults into the flow instead of trying to go over the top with dick jokes at the end. That was the one negative. Had he put together a bad post he would have been done.
No winner yet. Keep going.
-
I always thought there were 7 with the word "permanently" being the 7th.
-
Approaching pwnage. And keepthefaith left Mark Rypien out of his argument.
Time for a Hail Mary pass keepthefaith.
-
WOW. Nice work LeviF91. You came thisclose to putting away a victory. Your only mistake was doubling down on your opponents failed strategy of moving teams to small markets. Columbus? Really? Columbus at Harrisburg sounds like a ratings bonanza. Your defense of the name Levi was just ok and in the next paragraph you sounded like you were changing your own name. It took too long to mention Snyder. Other than these small imperfections you may have sealed the match. keepthefaith better have a real strong reply or this is over. Also, you don't have to wait your turn. Put him away now if you think that is a good strategy.
Since Birdog wrongly hinted that I might actually be DCTom I've been just seething. That aside, go back and read Keepthefaith's response to levi and you'll see he addressed your suggestion. Do you have any reading comprehension whatsoever you idiot and !@#$ing moron?
It seems weird for you to criticize Chickendog1960 when your name should be Chickennlong.
-
Good retort by keepthefaith albeit with some iffy arguments. A nice shot lobbed at LeviF91 but a little mild if you ask me. Personally I find it hard to believe that Nantucket, Cheektowaga or Harrisburg could support an NFL franchise.
A good start by both but pwnage has not been achieved. Keep working guys. New arguments or rebuttals...whatever you prefer.
-
Or to summarize: "Your grapes are sour!"
No he is just chicken. He is making up excuses because he thinks he would lose. I do appreciate him removing that post though. It was a nice gesture. Anyway, he called me partisan but I don't even know what that means. If it is something political it is wrong because I am not into politics. If it is a crack about my hair then he knows nothing about style. This contest will be judged fairly by the judge. Me.
To summarize: chicken.
-
Pretty solid start by LeviF91 I think. He was too nice to easy target keepthefaith but we are just getting started after all.
-
Something about a doctor that can't follow simple instructions that is scary...very scary.
Not following instructions is one thing. Being a chicken is another. You can get by in life either way. But both? A chicken that doesn't follow instructions? And chicken of a thread on a message board. Wow.
Edit: He took down his post so he is following instructions. Thanks Chickendog1960. I appreciate it.
-
Birdog1960.....or for this contest Chickendog1960. Throw your insults around in here...not the individual argument threads. Why were you too Chicken to play?
-
Feel free to comment in the main thread. Stop being rude in here. This is for LeviF91 and keepthefaith to attack the topic, each other, and civility in general.
Please delete your posts Gary and Birdog1960. Birdog being too chicken to join the fray, you'll be happy to know that you can insult as many people as you'd like in the main thread.
Will weigh in tonight. Have to get some work done today. This should be fun.
There is not a rush as long as you have well thought out arguments and insults. You have however been assigned the argument that the Redskins SHOULD change their name. If you had time to say you didn't have time then you had time to say which side you want. You forfeited that.
LeviF91 start whenever you want.
All: Please keep this thread to keepthefaith and LeviF91.
-
They hire a dude with a chick name as GM and everyone is surprised years later.
-
Or perhaps the coaches and the FO both knew what needed to be done and were told no by Littman. Again.
Update: Even Pat White is too expensive for Littman.
-
http://en.wikipedia....iling_increases
nice overview. It was created before we went off the gold standard
Your link says we raised the limit 90 times last century. That is basically once a year like the husband and wife. That is 90 arguments that could have been avoided. The debt ceiling itself was a modification to the prvious system. Let's just modify the ceiling to infinity and be done with the arguing.
-
You really don't see this as a blunder? Those coaches are paid handsomely to put a solid roster together. It's up to the FO to make sure that they have the pieces they need. If the coaches, prior to Thursday's game thought the Manuel would not get hurt all season then they were shortsighted. If the coaches, prior to Thursday's game thought that Tuel was a decent option if Manuel ever got hurt then they failed in their jobs as coaches. If the coaches told the FO that a capable backup was needed because Tuel was not ready (and may never be ready) to step on the field and the FO did nothing then they failed. There is no reason to lose that game...other than the blunder(s) that fits this scenario. Since we're not privy to the internal workings of the team we don't know which blunder(s) were in play here, but we do know that in the end it was a mistake.
Or perhaps the coaches and the FO both knew what needed to be done and were told no by Littman. Again.
-
Raising the country's debt ceiling? What is their to compromise about?
Here is what I don't get:
It seems like there are always arguments about raising the debt ceiling. It could be a Republican president and a Democratic congress or a Democratic president and a Republican congress. It doesn't seem to matter, there is always an argument. Anyway, it is like a wife that wants to increase the credit line on the card to get the kitchen re-modeled and the husband screams about it. The next year, the husband wants to do the same thing to get a new boat and the wife gets mad. It just leads to stress and there is diminished activity in the bedroom.
Here is what I don't get: Why is there a debt ceiling at all? We just keep raising it and raising it. Why not make it unlimited? That way there would be no more arguments.
-
keepthefaith and LeviF91 will kick this off. The topic is: Should the Washington Redskins change their name?
The thread is up.
-
keepthefaith and LeviF91: Please refer back to the original thread for rules. One tip is to be as insulting as possible. Making up topical or personal facts to bolster your argument is neither encouraged no frowned upon and there will be little to no fact checking by the judge. Me.
Everyone else: Feel free to comment on this battle but please put your comments in the original thread, not this one.
Topic: Should the Washington Redskins change their name?
Pick a side. If you pick opposite sides, start arguing. If you both want the same side there will be one more post in here by the judge. Me. It will pick the sides for you. After that, I will be back only to declare a winner.
TGreg99 vs. Rob's House
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted · Edited by 4merper4mer
Please leave this thread for TGreg99 and Rob's House only. Make comments in the main thread.
Guys, pick a side. If you pick opposite sides, then begin. If you pick the same side you will have to wait for the judge. Me.