4merper4mer

So has Mueller and he has thrived in this system while he bolsters it. As did lap dog Comey. All you have to do is look at Mueller to know if he would EVER look for truth anywhere and/or go after Clinton. NOPE

We will see. That is for sure. The only doubt I have at all is if they love Davis Webb. In other words, I don't have much doubt. Also when the OP titled this thread "dwarfing" I thought it was a Mayfield thread.

Including twice with the Browns. He has probably spoken at some level, at one point or another, with every non AFC East team.

You've written up so much good stuff on these QBs. You have emphasized the importance of QB. Now you're saying a team and their new GM fresh off being fired are going to think they can get from being the 2nd worst team in the league, all the way to being champs in the time a 37 year old better than average but non team carrying QB has left and be ok with picking their next leader at 32 while their cross town rivals have the guy they could have taken starring in their lineup for a decade? I'm leaning "nope" on that theory.

Laluelaleletletta is too long to fit on a jersey.

I don't know for sure but it did seem that McDermott was calling the shots. Why would Whaley trade all of what he did on Watkins and not extend unless he had another voice in the room?

Agree on points 2 and 3 but pick 23 for the middling Cooks? No way. The Rams are the Redskins on steroids with these big $ signings and draft pick giveaways. The only thing I think the new regime has screwed up since getting here was opting against Watkins 5th year. It would have increased his value, and he would still be a Ram with the Pats unable to move Cooks.

Regardless of what this means or doesn't about the Pats, the Rams are absolute morons. At 23 they could have just picked a receiver equal to or better than Cooks and had him cheap for 5 years. This is such a bad trade for them.

I don't get it.

Name a Patriot you didn't like.

Geez dude at least keep the Pope out of this thread. He has enough issues on this board already.

Rosen should be added to the flawed list due to the likelihood of a Rob Johson series of injuries.

He does have a financial interest even if it is indirect. He wants his students drafted high for the future of his business/reputation. I'm not saying he is wrong, just that your statement about his interest is incomplete.

They must be clowns if they refuse to deny reality. Of their top picks my guess at the bust is the tackle from Texas. It's a reflex. I'm not a huge Payne guy but I guess he makes sense position wise but they have us taking a questionable CB at 22? I think we take a CB, but much later.

IFFFFFF the Browns have Allen at 1 it isn't because they are the Browns, because they are stupid or because they fail to see his flaws and risks. It is because they see the flaws and risks of: Sam Darnold who makes Dave Krieg look like a protector of the ball Baker Mayfield whose Flutieesque size and Manzielesque attitude are risks and Josh Rosen who may make Rob Johnson look like Cal Ripken They are all risk/reward. But.....the top three teams need to take a QB for various reasons. My guess is that one of the four pans out....maybe even excels and the other three flop. My guess is Mayfield but it is a guess. Honestly think about all you read from many sources about these guys. How many times do you see sentences like: Qb x does skill y at an elite NFL Qb such as HOFer QB z? Not often. There are more sentences like:. If a then b QB x might end up solid. In other years, you read specific things about specific guys. This year I read specific positives about Allen's arm strength and Jackson's electricity and that's it. The QB rush seems based on quantity.

Denver is taking a QB for themselves foe Petes sake.

Because Lamar Always Cuddles Kittens?

Zero percent chance just like your stuff. And McCarron may or may not be the answer but it is clear that there was a well documented market for him, even if it did get botched.

Fair enough. I think the Bills should trade Shady for Barkley right after he is picked. Then we can pick Vander Doodle in the 4th so LB is set. We can pick Chubb when he slips to 12 and Mayfield at 22. Look good?

Lol. On one hand teams must do WHATEVER it takes to get a QB. Trade away two years worth of picks. On the other hand a team that has pick 2 might not want a QB. Makes total sense. it doesn't matter what sequence takes place. QBs are going 123 and then either 4 or 5. Allen is the only one that could fall at all due to him sucking out loud.

What is your solution? Tanking? Whining? Physical threats to other teams that were worse? All of the above?

Dude. Whatever. It's like complaining about a snowstorm. Stop imagining that you can wish it away.

When you were two and you wanted Lucky Charms but your mom said no did you cry? Did you learn to stop doing that? if so, then think of the Giants, Jets, Browns and Broncos as your Mom. Because they will say no.

My bad. Similar avatars caused me to quote the wrong poster.

But your whining about not getting Wentz or trading up this year with teams that clearly need a QB as much as us is as what if as it gets. These were/are mission impossible. Mahoney last year is the only plausible scenario you present and it remains to be seen what he offers.