What I clearly meant was that as of now, he has no recourse to get a "top 3" QB. Yet many on here post over and over about trading with the Giants. It's just dumb IMO. If it is so amazingly important to ignore 52 roster spots to get your guy then why haven't the Giants discovered this in their 90-ish years of history? The QB at all costs crowd literally has to ignore their own argument for it to make any sense.
As as for your theory, the reality is that Browns at 1 and Giants at 2 were ALWAYS taking QB and never trading and the Colts have stated they did not want to move out of the top 10. In case you hadn't noticed, 12 is out of the top 10. In reality, the best case scenario for the Bills was to make three trades before the Jets, Dolphins, Broncos, or Cardinals made one.
We don't have a top 3 pick but we blew it when we had the chance and took some loser named Bruce Smith. What ever happened to him?